Yes another abortion topic

Noob

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
1,470
Yes this is another abortion topic. However this should be rather or not the government as the power to decide if abortions should be mandatory, or rather mandatory volunteerism of abortions, and have the power to limit the amount of how many kids you have.

You know with global warming, over population, the NEED to control the population growth so that America can be a sustainable growth nation, with limits on what size of house you can own, and limits on every thing to reduce your carbon footprint. Less kids, smaller carbon footprint they clam you have.

I am sure if they end up doing that, those members of Congress would be exempt from the law they pass, and be free to have as many kids as they want to. It might be some like out of an movie, were on a Island, all thier kids, along with all the Presidents kids the public does not know about, are sent there to be rise and grow up there. Whill at the same time they parade around and demand that every body follow the law, and send those who dont into prison for the rest of thier lifes.

So the Depopulation Fanatics, Eugenicists Royal Society Launch "Objective" Global Population Study. Just like Global warming, climate chang, those retarded members of Congress well more than likely well use this report as a basis to pass laws for what China as, One-Child policy. OF course if some thing like that does happen, you can expect Republicans to be against it, and Democrates for it. They play the two party system, and in the end pass the law. The Suprem Court would end up ruling that it is Constitutional since they all ready ruled that abortion is legal in Roe v Wade, and ruled that carbon can be regulated back in 2007. It does seem with Kagen, Al Gore, and others are trying to set up such a system that China uses here in America.


http://www.infowars.net/articles/july2010/120710Depopulation.htm
 
Last edited:
All right move it to off topic than.

Why should it be moved to Off Topic? I think that the Libertarian's argument against abortion is very intelligent and abortion is most definitely a political debate.

If the government wants to be evilly efficient, it would make more sense to them to humanely execute people when they reach 75 years old, rather than abort babies. Babies grow up to be adults that can work, produce and fight wars.

I find it funny how Republicans who are against abortion also love war. Talk about a theme and contradiction.
 
I am so pissed off at Al Gore right now.

He's prancing around talking about the sea level rising, he just bought a fucking mansion right ON the fucking beach!!

Not only that, if I were to choose the LAST PLACE IN THE ENTIRE WORLD... the LAST STREET IN THE WORLD that I would want him to live.. HE FUCKING CHOSE IT!! I can't say why I'm so pissed off about it because this is a public forum, but believe me, I am LIVID!!
 
I am so pissed off at Al Gore right now.

He's prancing around talking about the sea level rising, he just bought a fucking mansion right ON the fucking beach!!

Not only that, if I were to choose the LAST PLACE IN THE ENTIRE WORLD... the LAST STREET IN THE WORLD that I would want him to live.. HE FUCKING CHOSE IT!! I can't say why I'm so pissed off about it because this is a public forum, but believe me, I am LIVID!!

That is because he is a liberal; not a leftest.
 

A liberal is a hypocrite who doesn't practice what they preach; like Al Gore. They flip-flop on issues to win votes; like Hillary did on abortion. Liberals Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy were for women's rights; with the exception of those they seduced.

A leftest is an activist who would never sellout on their principles, and they practice what they preach. Picture the old hippie organic farmer who uses solar power and likes to indulge in a little weed now and then. Everything he preaches; he practices, and no amount of money or power will change his leftest views. I admire leftest; I abhor liberals.
 
If they made abortion mandatory, I would kill anyone who ever attempted it on my future wife and child.

Abortion should be illegal, not mandatory. And there is no such thing as overpopulation. Even if there was, people have no problem with it though as seen by their desire to live in filthy cities.
 
If they made abortion mandatory, I would kill anyone who ever attempted it on my future wife and child.

Abortion should be illegal, not mandatory. And there is no such thing as overpopulation. Even if there was, people have no problem with it though as seen by their desire to live in filthy cities.

I noticed that sperm swim. They are alive aren't they? Should we save the sperm?
 
whatever your personal belief system about abortion is . you will never put that genie back in the bottle and never put that rabbit back in the hat.

Any politician tries to make abortion a focal point of any election from here forward is politically DOA.
 
Yes this is another abortion topic. However this should be rather or not the government as the power to decide if abortions should be mandatory, or rather mandatory volunteerism of abortions, and have the power to limit the amount of how many kids you have.

You know with global warming, over population, the NEED to control the population growth so that America can be a sustainable growth nation, with limits on what size of house you can own, and limits on every thing to reduce your carbon footprint. Less kids, smaller carbon footprint they clam you have.

I am sure if they end up doing that, those members of Congress would be exempt from the law they pass, and be free to have as many kids as they want to. It might be some like out of an movie, were on a Island, all thier kids, along with all the Presidents kids the public does not know about, are sent there to be rise and grow up there. Whill at the same time they parade around and demand that every body follow the law, and send those who dont into prison for the rest of thier lifes.

So the Depopulation Fanatics, Eugenicists Royal Society Launch "Objective" Global Population Study. Just like Global warming, climate chang, those retarded members of Congress well more than likely well use this report as a basis to pass laws for what China as, One-Child policy. OF course if some thing like that does happen, you can expect Republicans to be against it, and Democrates for it. They play the two party system, and in the end pass the law. The Suprem Court would end up ruling that it is Constitutional since they all ready ruled that abortion is legal in Roe v Wade, and ruled that carbon can be regulated back in 2007. It does seem with Kagen, Al Gore, and others are trying to set up such a system that China uses here in America.


http://www.infowars.net/articles/july2010/120710Depopulation.htm

They only way to maintain the entitlement program is large population growth. I don't see any any pro-government movement to reduce population.
 
They only way to maintain the entitlement program is large population growth. I don't see any any pro-government movement to reduce population.

Who says the real goal is to maintain the entitlement program? It could be the depopulation of the world throw by any means, the entitlement program could be part of that. keeping people relying on the government to provide every thing for them. Than the goverment lets the economy crash and start rationing what they relay on.
 
I noticed that sperm swim. They are alive aren't they? Should we save the sperm?

Being alive or not is not how you measure to give something rights. An ant and a tree are alive. A sperm is not a person and by itself never will be. An embryo is a human, just at its earliest stage.
 
They only way to maintain the entitlement program is large population growth. I don't see any any pro-government movement to reduce population.

Would you consider the people in China who instituted a one child policy to be "pro-government"? Anyway, those in this country who push the hardest for "abortion rights" are also pushing for guest worker programs. They've got their bases covered. ;)
 
insanity_mario.jpg
 
Being alive or not is not how you measure to give something rights. An ant and a tree are alive. A sperm is not a person and by itself never will be. An embryo is a human, just at its earliest stage.

+1

Sperm are not genetically distinct individuals, as embryos (zygotes, as has been pointed out) are. Sperm are genetically identical to the male emittor, if I may be so... icky. ;) As I understand the concept of individual sovereignty, abortion is very plainly immoral.
 
Last edited:
Abortion is a high priority in the commies list of "Things to destroy a society" because: a) Its an attack on Christian principles (attacking Chrsitianity and all spirituality is the nº1 priority) b) Above all, its a statement. It says that Humans are no longer "magical" but animals instead. And like all animals they are good to control and -ultimatly- to slaughter. c) The whole population control thing definatly plays a part.

Also worth of notice is how almost all homos support abortion because they know that a society that supports abortion is a society more likely to accept their Nation-destroying filth. All this homos that support abortion couldnt care less about the woman or anyone else, they, as usual, care only about themselfs and their homosexuality.

Thousands and thousands of years of the process of trial-and-error (tradition/culture is nothing but the result of this process) gave us the leason that abortion is sick...in just a few decades of commie brainwashing thousands and thousands of years were thrown down the drain...yes thats how effetive and cleaver the commies are and how stupid the masses can be.
 
Back
Top