Yahoo News: Iran [Non-Weapon] nuke work at bunker is confirmed

[Scott F]

More propoganda to try to discredit Ron's foreign policy?

Yet just yesterday, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, confirmed that Iran is NOT working on nukes....



Yahoo front news http://news.yahoo.com/iran-nuke-bunker-confirmed-115201184.html

 

[kylejack]

Iran is working on non-weapon nuclear technology in the bunker, under the supervision of IAEA.

 

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

Wouldn't us constantly threatening Iran make them WANT to have a nuclear weapon?

 

[LibertyEagle]

Dude. All thread titles in Grassroots Central are tweeted. So, unless you want to advertise this story even further, please think a bit more about your thread titles.

 

[kylejack]

Dude. All thread titles in Grassroots Central are tweeted. So, unless you want to advertise this story even further, please think a bit more about your thread titles.

It's a public news story. Who is this horde of people who ignore the news but read that particular Twitter account? I don't think they exist.

 

[Travlyr]

Pop quiz: Who is the aggressor?

Under international and US law, blockades are acts of war and variously defined as:

-- surrounding a nation or objective with hostile forces;

-- measures to isolate an enemy;

-- encirclement and besieging;

-- preventing the passage in or out of supplies, military forces or aid in time of or as an act of war; and

-- an act of naval warfare to block access to an enemy's coastline and deny entry to all vessels and aircraft.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9866

IRAN IS SURROUNDED BY U.S.- NATO MILITARY BASES

 

[angelatc]

Heh. It's really not grassroots though.

On the other hand, Iran is supposed to be allowed to use nuclear power for fuel and medicine, and they maintain that's all they're doing. The world decided they weren't going to allow them to purchase their fuel rods from other nations, so they really had no choice except to create their own.

 

[ItsTime]

Wouldn't us constantly threatening Iran make them WANT to have a nuclear weapon?

And have them buy materials from Huntsman company? Yup it would.

 

[affa]

This article is ridiculous and misleading and clearly timed for the NH primary. Please stop spreading this junk.

 

[The Gold Standard]

The move was expected, with Tehran announcing months ago that it would use the Fordo facility for 20 percent production.

Those evil scum. 20% isn't nearly enriched enough for a weapon, but we ought not take the chance. We must invade immediately. We have enough paper and ink left at the Fed to pay for it. America, fuck yeah.

 

[Wolfgang Bohringer]

My understanding is that, the US proposed that Iran have its 3% purified to 20% for medical uses by a 3rd party (like France or somebody). The Iranians said ok, but since we don't trust you to give it back to us at all, how about we exchange our 3% for some of your 20% and Obama and Hitlery said No!

 

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

Those evil scum. 20% isn't nearly enriched enough for a weapon, but we ought not take the chance. We must invade immediately. We have enough paper and ink left at the Fed to pay for it. America, fuck yeah.

Nevermind North Korea, who has nuclear weapons--but one thing is different--Iran's natural resource is oil, North Korea's is dirt.

 

[moderate libertarian]

Can someone explain why Iran tweets to US news media every step of its nuke building step but same MSM gets no tweets from Israel abouts its nuke plants?

I don't think any country building a bomb would issue step by step press release to US media, that stuff happens in secret when bombs are built.

 

[Scott F]

Sorry, wasn't trying to spread the word about the story's contents. I wanted to point out how it was a hit piece. Damn the media is trying hard.

It's obviously an indirect hit piece by the media to try to discredit Ron Paul prior to NH primary, and also for fear-mongering. I mean the title of it was extremely misleading. Someone purposefully wrote it vague to scare people and cause sensationalism.