Would You Vote For Trump If He Promised A New 9/11 Investigation?

[Makes Interesting Points]

Maybe this is a naive question, but why would the federal 9/11 "investigators" even write a part of the report that reveals the truth behind 9/11, and then make it possible to be declassified later? Wouldn't they just lie in the report? Maybe the classified documents have no conspiracy clues written in them, but are classified so that when they become declassified, we think that all the info is out and there's no conspiracy. As someone who believes there's a 65% chance that 9/11 has some level of conspiracy to it, there's not much I want more than the truth to be revealed. I don't see a possible way that Trump could get far with 9/11, but if hypothetically he had a realistic way to do it, I would consider voting for him, mostly just for that.

 

[ProBlue33]

Hasn't he talked about it already?

http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/donald-trump-promises-to-reopen-911-investigation-if-elected/

Thank you for posting that, I did not know. This is a massive deal for me. Justice for 9/11 is important, and the neocons that ruined Ron Paul chances need to be fully exposed for what they did. What Trump said the other night resonates more than ever, and we know why the boo's were coming.
Scripted neocon propaganda, but this time I don't think the voters are buying, if Bush gets crushed in SC the tide will have turned.

 

[misterx]

Maybe this is a naive question, but why would the federal 9/11 "investigators" even write a part of the report that reveals the truth behind 9/11, and then make it possible to be declassified later? Wouldn't they just lie in the report? Maybe the classified documents have no conspiracy clues written in them, but are classified so that when they become declassified, we think that all the info is out and there's no conspiracy. As someone who believes there's a 65% chance that 9/11 has some level of conspiracy to it, there's not much I want more than the truth to be revealed. I don't see a possible way that Trump could get far with 9/11, but if hypothetically he had a realistic way to do it, I would consider voting for him, mostly just for that.

Not everyone wants to play ball, and they don't have to. If they don't, you just classify anything they find and you're all good.

 

[Fivezeroes]

One of the biggest moments in the GOP in years...

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/trump-9-11-debate-219273

Doesn't look to be backfiring. He's currently now sitting at 40+ % in a new SC poll.

 

[AuH20]

Priceless. Going for the jugular so they can never plague him again. He senses the weakness in the Neocon circles. Why do I get the feeling that Trump is luring these hapless twits into a trap of his choosing? Let them attack you and then drop the 28 unclassified pages bomb.

 

[Anti-Neocon]

I'm anti-anti-truther meaning I'm against the people who don't want open investigations. Anti-truthers are the worst, and (perhaps unknowingly) advocate for a non-transparent secretive government for which there are no verifiable checks, and they use fallacious attacks to shut down those who question events for which we don't have complete answers (a healthy part of any free society). Investigating 9/11 in specific does little to me, if it is done by some sort of top down procedure. What matters to me is structural transparency which requires reforming our investigations so that the people in general know what is going on. Trump seems like a big authoritarian who would never do such a thing. And those who ridicule people for wanting public information should be deported to another side of a wall somewhere. Maybe in Gaza.

 

[H. E. Panqui]

I'm not a truther, in fact I dislike them.



...not a 'truther'...hmmmm....are you a 'liar'?...

(...i sense this pathetic republicrat 'likes' and will vote for/affirm any number of republicrat liars..republicrat see, republicrat do...)

btw, good to see goldwater back from the cyber-hoosegow!!...

 

[Anti-Neocon]

I'm not a truther, in fact I dislike them.



...not a 'truther'...hmmmm....are you a 'liar'?...

(...i sense this pathetic republicrat 'likes' and will vote for/affirm any number of republicrat liars..republicrat see, republicrat do...)

btw, good to see goldwater back from the cyber-hoosegow!!...

It's easy to dislike people who just spout bullshit as fact with no evidence. They are hardly better than the government saying nothing.

But if you reduce that dislike of specific irrational people into a rejection and ridicule of all who are "truthers", you are an enemy of free thought.

 

[AuH20]

I'm not a truther, but the official story has some really big holes.

 

[ProBlue33]

I'm not a truther, but the official story has some really big holes.

Yes and one of those big holes is mentioned by Trump in that article

“How do two planes take out three buildings in the same day? I never got my head around the fact that nothing is mentioned about the destruction of Building 7 in the 585 page document” he explained, talking about World Trade Center 7 which also collapsed during the September 11 attacks.

 

[Fivezeroes]

Yes and one of those big holes is mentioned by Trump in that article

the gummit said they took it down due to structural damage, there was no structural damage to that place, may some aesthetic damage but nothing that warranted needing to bring it down.

 

[Root]

No. Regardless of 9/11 or that an elected official might actually keep an election promise, one of the big things Ron taught me is not to gamble with my principles.

 

[Origanalist]

I wouldn't vote for Trump if he offered to let me bang his daughter.

 

[Fivezeroes]

I wouldn't vote for Trump if he offered to let me bang his daughter.

If I wasn't already, that would be tempting...

 

[Origanalist]

 

[TommyJeff]

So my question to those of you in that category is would you vote for him if he promised this?

no. I'm not a 1 issue Voter.
I also don't vote for bribes. Not unless I can get free healthcare and free college and free phones and free houses and free apples. Because I like apples.

 

[TommyJeff]

Priceless. Going for the jugular so they can never plague him again. He senses the weakness in the Neocon circles. Why do I get the feeling that Trump is luring these hapless twits into a trap of his choosing? Let them attack you and then drop the 28 unclassified pages bomb.

intersting tweet.
I guess that's similar to a wife/husband being off limit until they start campaigning against another candidate?!

 

[AuH20]

 

[otherone]

Priceless. Going for the jugular so they can never plague him again. He senses the weakness in the Neocon circles. Why do I get the feeling that Trump is luring these hapless twits into a trap of his choosing? Let them attack you and then drop the 28 unclassified pages bomb.

The only thing that neocons have left is unquestioned nationalism. If Trump can separate trailer-parkers from their exceptionalism, then the neocons are finished.

 

[Origanalist]

After she started to bore him.