Mini-Me
Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2008
- Messages
- 6,514
Guys, don't feel too disheartened. Was this a bad debate? Yes, it was. Paul had very little speaking time, and while he had several good moments, he didn't make the best of the very little time he did have. Romney, unfortunately, looked very good with all of the time he was given to bullshit and say things he doesn't have any intention of following through on. That said, there WILL be other debates, and if another candidate drops out of the race, Paul will get more time.
I wanted to point something out that I thought was interesting, though...I think that without knowing it, Huckabee really did Ron Paul a favor tonight: When Tim Russert pressed him on how "realistic" his ideas were, Huckabee was very assertive and confident in shutting him up and saying that part of America's problem is this misplaced focus on whether new ideas are "realistic" to actually do. I think he had a very coherent, convincing answer that we need to talk about what we can do to fix the broken system rather than taking a defeatist attitude and assuming we need to stick to the status quo forever. While Huckabee is like Paul in advocating the abolition of the IRS, the real irony of this is that Paul supports far more radical changes than other candidate, and he's the one most often criticized for not being "realistic" about drastically cutting back the size of government. Huckabee's answer gave anyone listening something to chew on, and when he drops out of the race soon (which is becoming more and more likely), this optimistic attitude about real change could be a boon for Paul. In other words, in addressing a criticism meant for him, Huckabee did a terrific job at defending Ron Paul from similar criticisms.
I wanted to point something out that I thought was interesting, though...I think that without knowing it, Huckabee really did Ron Paul a favor tonight: When Tim Russert pressed him on how "realistic" his ideas were, Huckabee was very assertive and confident in shutting him up and saying that part of America's problem is this misplaced focus on whether new ideas are "realistic" to actually do. I think he had a very coherent, convincing answer that we need to talk about what we can do to fix the broken system rather than taking a defeatist attitude and assuming we need to stick to the status quo forever. While Huckabee is like Paul in advocating the abolition of the IRS, the real irony of this is that Paul supports far more radical changes than other candidate, and he's the one most often criticized for not being "realistic" about drastically cutting back the size of government. Huckabee's answer gave anyone listening something to chew on, and when he drops out of the race soon (which is becoming more and more likely), this optimistic attitude about real change could be a boon for Paul. In other words, in addressing a criticism meant for him, Huckabee did a terrific job at defending Ron Paul from similar criticisms.