Worst Debate Ever??

Maybe we're just biased and expecting him to get all the air time. For the time he's had, he's done amazingly well, I'd say it's his best debate yet
 
Reasons it's good: He looks like he has an IQ way above the rest, except for possibly Romney.
Reasons it's bad: 1 hour of debate, 90 seconds of Ron Paul :(
 
I miss the way Ron debated before the primaries, he was inspirational and thought-provoking.. He just always seems tired and bumbling nowadays. :(
 
You can't make RP look bad in this debate as they learned from the SC debate so there censoring him from every question they can.
 
They are afraid of him. I think this debate makes RP supporters sound right. Many did not believe the media blackout, many did not believe RP's simple and poignant views...so as bad as this is - I think RP walks away looking good.
 
This is ridiculous.
I think we're still on the "First they ignore you" thing.

He did get more time when there were 10 candidates..

Might as well have been a Romney paid advertisement.
 
I think it's been about average for Paul. I've actually had the TV on mute for the other candidates because I'm tired of their same nonsensical BS and all the Huckleberry jokes. Maybe above-average overall if his question to McCain gets media coverage.
 
Paul is fine, the assholes controlling the time distribution are awful

they did just say Dr. Paul, Congressman Paul
 
Guys, there are important questions being asked. There's no time for Ron Paul or America.

WE'RE DEALING WITH CHUCK NORRIS!
 
I hate to say it, but he's not using the time he does get effectively. He's not comfortable up there. He rambles. He doesn't stay on message. This debate has been a disaster and the only saving grace is that he's NOT been given much time.

He needs a speech coach. He needs consice and clear messaging. He needs to know how to answer these gotcha questions without turning off voters.
 
Back
Top