Women's support proves key

No. All human beings should not be equal. The lesser of us should have to fucking pay for being something we can not control and it is obviously a mother-fucking negative that we keep the human population going because we put up with your bullshit.

Fuck yeah. I wish I had a penis, because then I'd finally be good enough. I'd be able to write my name in the snow with my very own piss.

Fuck you.

Snow eventually melts. Real men like Chuck Norris, who want to make a lasting impression, piss their name into concrete instead. :D

Seriously though, the first line of your post is what it comes down to: Equal rights under the law, specifically because women must put up with the laws of the government just the same way that the men must. Even if every single woman in the country voted like a retarded monkey hyped up on crack, which obviously isn't the case, they would still have a right to representation. Of course, if women really were this mentally invalid, I guess it would be difficult to justify letting them vote while still excluding children, who are not allowed to vote because of the usually correct assumption that they're too incompetent to do so. ;) In this vein, it bothers me that I have trouble clearly differentiating the way we don't allow children to vote from the way bigots of previous generations did not allow other groups of supposedly "incompetent" people to vote, such as women and racial minorities. I mean, sure, the vast majority of children are entirely incapable of forming sensible political views...but then again, so is the rest of the population, based on our own experience with elections. ;) In this way, an age cutoff seems just as arbitrary as a gender cutoff, racial standard, income cutoff, IQ test cutoff, etc. I suppose children are unique, however, since they typically have to worry a whole lot more about the dictatorship of their parents than they have to worry about the potential tyranny of their government.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top