Will you vote for Romney in November now that Obamacare has been upheld?

Will you vote for Romney now in November after Obamacare has passed?

  • Yes-I was going to vote for someone else, now I will vote for Romney

    Votes: 10 3.4%
  • Yes-I planned to vote for Romney all along

    Votes: 7 2.4%
  • No- I will not vote for Romney

    Votes: 254 87.3%
  • No- I was going to vote for Romney, now that Obamacare has passed, I will vote for someone else

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I do not plan to vote in November

    Votes: 20 6.9%

  • Total voters
    291
I am not voting for Romney no matter what laws passes or does not pass between now and election time. Also I do not think the Republicans actually want to win the election they want to let Obama finish trashing the Constitution.
 
Whether through Obamacare OR because Romney forces the states to do it by requiring that each states goes with Romneycare to get federal funds, if you vote for an R or a D, YOU WILL BE FORCED into purchasing healthcare.

Neither Obama OR Romney will let the people that "made them what they are" down. Lobbyists for pharmaceuticals & insurance wrote BOTH Obamacare AND Romneycare. That is fact.

Both the Affordable Care Act and Romneycare, which FORCES Massachusetts' citizens to pay the HIGHEST insurance premiums in the nation, are AWFUL options!

HealthCareFamilyPremiumsperState.jpg


When government gets into anything costs go UP and quality deteriorates.

In my opinion.
 
Last edited:
The only ways Romney gets my vote is to put a Paul on the ticket OR immediately starts campaigning and fundraising for our liberty candidates in a big way.

...And then there's that idea that my voting is showing my approval in a system I no longer believe in anyway. I'm not sure what I'm going to do really.

That is about where I am at.

Staying home or if a Paul is on the ticket possibly Romney. The only reason I would vote for him is if I believed the opposition to him from within the party is strong enough that he knows he could not get re-elected in 4 years if he did not totally kill Obamacare. It would be allot to swallow.

I think there is about a 40% chance of that with Romney which is not good and believe they could easily fool people with a Gingrich like plan providing the states ability to opt-in or opt-out just like welfare reform which was an assault on everyone's individual liberty.
 
Last edited:
My choice wasn't offered: "I wanted Ron or Rand or Demint or Napalitano or Stossel or any sane small govt, non neocon... but I WILL vote for the eventual GOP nominee, because we cannot AFFORD 4 more years of Karl Marx Obama. So I had to vote for "Yes-I planned to vote for Romney all along". Blech, made me nauseous doing so.
 
My choice wasn't offered: "I wanted Ron or Rand or Demint or Napalitano or Stossel or any sane small govt, non neocon... but I WILL vote for the eventual GOP nominee, because we cannot AFFORD 4 more years of Karl Marx Obama. So I had to vote for "Yes-I planned to vote for Romney all along". Blech, made me nauseous doing so.

But "we" can afford four or eight years of Robomney?

And then 8 years of Pepsi after that?

So maybe in 2028 a liberty candidate can run.

Tell me, honestly, you folks that are so concerned with "getting rid of Obama", what more could he, or Bush before him for that matter, possibly do?

We are at war around the world, the treasury is bankrupt, the cops are militarizing and gearing up for war against the American people at a blistering pace, and the executive branch claims it now has the right to kill American citizens just on its say so alone.

I'd say as things get worse from this point, so much the better, it'll knock a few more off the fence and make them understand, you ain't sitting this one out.

Meanwhile, the system increasingly has its hands full trying to keep millions and millions of people, with more coming every year, fed, housed, clothed and out of trouble.

Bring it on...
 
Back
Top