[Will vote Trump now] Kyle Rittenhouse announces he will write in Ron Paul and not vote Trump

[Swordsmyth]

LOL didn't he say something to the effect of "I'm not gonna change my mind" and then not even 5 minutes later he does a complete 180?

That dude changes his mind faster than he shoots 3 different people in same day

He's a dumb kid who was deceived by DeStatus operatives.
Cut him some slack, he should be commended for not clinging to a stupid and counterproductive position and being willing to listen to the other side.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Dumb kid.
Commendable.
Hmm. Depends on the topic and whether you agree or not.

 

[PAF]

Dumb kid.
Commendable.
Hmm. Depends on the topic and whether you agree or not.

Guns aren't going anywhere if the owners stand their ground. That kid seems to be, well, a kid, because he's a single issue voter and obviously hasn't seen the record of how much destruction the previous POTUS caused. As I quite often repeat, it all comes down to money.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Naglfar

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnIu3o3sRtU

 

[LibertyEagle]

No worries, AF, it's just another incentive to stay under the radar, live off the grid as best you can, and keep those bike wheels spinning ;-)


You're gonna be like, "why didn't I become an anarchist sooner?!"

Wanting our country to completely fall reminds me of what i thought when some here wanted open borders.

They used to call people who unknowingly and some knowingly, did things to assist those wanting to bring down our country as “useful idiots”. Historically, these people were the first ones offed under the new regime. The term came from the regime doing the toppling.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiot

 

[acptulsa]

Historically, these people were the first ones offed under the new regime. The term came from the regime doing the toppling.

When I was born, the Regime was We, the People. Then a month later, Herbie Bush and the Spooks performed their number...

What do you suppose We, the People would call our useful idiots? Do we have any, or do all idiots favor the Regime? Wouldn't it be good to find out, instead of submitting to Pick From The Two Worst Presidents In History -- and if you want the lesser evil, we'll trade you that for the Constitution?

 

[Occam's Banana]

https://x.com/RealSpikeCohen/status/1819492463557726598

 

[Occam's Banana]

https://x.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1819515623442939963

 

[Anti Federalist]

https://x.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1819515623442939963

That's how I felt about it.

 

[Anti Globalist]

LOL didn't he say something to the effect of "I'm not gonna change my mind" and then not even 5 minutes later he does a complete 180?

That dude changes his mind faster than he shoots 3 different people in same day

He's a young kid so it's not surprising that he can be easily manipulated.

 

[PAF]

Wanting our country to completely fall reminds me of what i thought when some here wanted open borders.

They used to call people who unknowingly and some knowingly, did things to assist those wanting to bring down our country as “useful idiots”. Historically, these people were the first ones offed under the new regime. The term came from the regime doing the toppling.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiot

The Bill of Rights was well-intended but didn't go far enough. There is nothing in them that holds those accountable for violating the rights of others. It also doesn't mention the right to freely travel as long as one does not violate private property.

The rest of the constitution is simply a transfer of rights and power from self to others.

Those arbitrary lines that you cling to represent where governments/countries begin and end. I was not aware the "Land of Liberty"'s lines meant emulating other countries, which American's themselves are so intent in doing.

 

[LibertyEagle]

https://x.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1819515623442939963

Absolutely agreed!

 

[LibertyEagle]

The Bill of Rights was well-intended but didn't go far enough. There is nothing in them that holds those accountable for violating the rights of others. It also doesn't mention the right to freely travel as long as one does not violate private property.

The rest of the constitution is simply a transfer of rights and power from self to others.

Those arbitrary lines that you cling to represent where governments/countries begin and end. I was not aware the "Land of Liberty"'s lines meant emulating other countries, which American's themselves are so intent in doing.

The Constitution isn’t perfect, but it is the best that any nation has come up with. Because of it, you are still able to mouth off.

Once upon a time, countries were a way for people who wanted to live by certain principles, could gather together. Borders are lines of demarcation between countries, who want to live with different principles.

Before you say you didn’t agree to follow those principles, someone in your ancestry did. So, you can take it up with them.

 

[PAF]

The Constitution isn’t perfect, but it is the best that any nation has come up with. Because of it, you are still able to mouth off.

Once upon a time, countries were a way for people who wanted to live by certain principles, could gather together. Borders are lines of demarcation between countries, who want to live with different principles.

Before you say you didn’t agree to follow those principles, someone in your ancestry did. So, you can take it up with them.

People are born where they are born and have no control over that. Some simply want to migrate where they have better opportunities and/or feel their principles are more inline. Such as mine, for example, when my ancestry came over well after the constitution was ratified, because the idea of liberty and prosperity was important to them. It was my grandfather who started the first electric company in the town that I was born.

It is government, lobbyists and those in power on both sides of the isle who take advantage and legislate anti-liberty laws for profit. Without principles, folks like you many of the people fall for the trap and wonder what what happened to this country. I assure you it is not "invaders", but the ones responsible for the exploitation, which in turn count on people, both left and right factions, who support more anti-liberty laws.

 

[LibertyEagle]

People are born where they are born and have no control over that. Some simply want to migrate where they have better opportunities and/or feel their principles are more inline. Such as mine, for example, when my ancestry came over well after the constitution was ratified, because the idea of liberty and prosperity was important to them. It was my grandfather who started the first electric company in the town that I was born.

It is government, lobbyists and those in power on both sides of the isle who take advantage and legislate anti-liberty laws for profit. Without principles, folks like you many of the people fall for the trap and wonder what what happened to this country. I assure you it is not "invaders", but the ones responsible for the exploitation, which in turn count on people, both left and right factions, who support more anti-liberty laws.

I think all, or the overwhelming majority, of us on this forum are here because we don’t like what those occupying our government have been up to. For most, that is why we supported Ron Paul. That is not the same thing as what you seem to want, which appears to be aligned very closely to what the globalists are actually doing to bring down our country.

And yes, allowing our borders to be illegally overrun by a massive number of illegal aliens is a very real step by the globalists to bring us down. You do realize we have legal immigration, at rates such that they can assimilate into our culture vs the other way around. I think what Ted Kennedy did to our immigration laws kicked this off, actually, by changing which countries were allowed to immigrate. Because with that change, there no longer seemed to be any focus on whether the people’s culture would meld into ours. For reference, check what is going on in the UK.

Please correct me if I am wrong, but you seem to want the country to fall. Ron Paul never wanted that, so why is it that you supported him?

 

[PAF]

I think all, or the overwhelming majority, of us on this forum are here because we don’t like what those occupying our government have been up to. For most, that is why we supported Ron Paul. That is not the same thing as what you seem to want, which appears to be aligned very closely to what the globalists are actually doing to bring down our country.

And yes, allowing our borders to be illegally overrun by a massive number of illegal aliens is a very real step by the globalists to bring us down. You do realize we have legal immigration, at rates such that they can assimilate into our culture vs the other way around. I think what Ted Kennedy did to our immigration laws kicked this off, actually, by changing which countries were allowed to immigrate. Because with that change, there no longer seemed to be any focus on whether the people’s culture would meld into ours. For reference, check what is going on in the UK.

Please correct me if I am wrong, but you seem to want the country to fall. Ron Paul never wanted that, so why is it that you supported him?

https://mises.org/

There's even a Free Book offer written by Rothbard to help entice you to visit there ;-)

 

[LibertyEagle]

https://mises.org/

There's even a Free Book offer written by Rothbard to help entice you to visit there ;-)

I met Rothbard, more than once. Have you?

 

[PAF]

I met Rothbard, more than once. Have you?

Oh, I have a ton-load of photos that would fill volumes where I sit with Ron Paul, Tom Massie, Lew Rockwell, Dan McAdams, who I see at least once or twice a year over the past couple decades, and many, many others too. In fact, they've sat with me.

But with me it's not a photo/other contest. It's about principles, fiscal responsibility, and reaching others to get them to understand that politicians/government is not the answer. Simply put, the answer is for the People to actually become principled.

I guess in response to your post, how can you possibly support Trump if you've met Rothbard more than once? I'm really scratching my head on that one. Even Ron Paul said "Trump isn't my favorite president", and he was trying to be as humanly nice as one possibly could.

 

[LibertyEagle]

When I was born, the Regime was We, the People. Then a month later, Herbie Bush and the Spooks performed their number...

Yes, both Bush’s sucked. I didn’t support either. But, what is going on has been going on long before the Bush’s. They did however put the pedal to the metal after 9-11. The globalists had written that they planned to have it all wrapped up by the year 2000. But, enough got in their way. They have been making up for time lost after 9-11.

What do you suppose We, the People would call our useful idiots? Do we have any, or do all idiots favor the Regime?

Show me your plan. All I have seen you support is Johnson/Weld, with Weld being the co-chair of the CFR task force to put the US into a North American Union with Canada and Mexico. And recently, you have argued for voting for RFK, Jr.

Wouldn't it be good to find out, instead of submitting to Pick From The Two Worst Presidents In History -- and if you want the lesser evil, we'll trade you that for the Constitution?

I am not sure I understand you here. Is this you pitching RFK, Jr? Please explain.

 

[PAF]

..

The gradual decline. Both Bush's, 3 terms, now Trump, potentially twice. Good grief.

Concerning RFK Jr., have you read this? Attended a Meetup