speciallyblend
Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2007
- Messages
- 20,351
Flip side of NO ONE BUT RON PAUL is that NO ONE WANTS HIM AS VP. I mean, think about it.
exactly if ron paul accepted a vp spot on a status quo ticket. I would leave the gop.
Flip side of NO ONE BUT RON PAUL is that NO ONE WANTS HIM AS VP. I mean, think about it.
Don't know where to put this but I absolutely cannot stand Gingrich. Santorum annoys me, Romney is laughably fake but Gingrich just drives me completely off the ledge.
I will never vote for Newt Gingrich. In fact, if Newt Gingrich was running I would vote for Obama under the premise that this vote would do the most harm against Gingrich. I would donate to whatever PAC is running the strongest anti-gingrich ads.
Newt Gingrich is everything that is wrong with our political system in one overweight, ethically pliable package of BS.
Don't know where to put this but I absolutely cannot stand Gingrich. Santorum annoys me, Romney is laughably fake but Gingrich just drives me completely off the ledge.
I will never vote for Newt Gingrich. In fact, if Newt Gingrich was running I would vote for Obama under the premise that this vote would do the most harm against Gingrich. I would donate to whatever PAC is running the strongest anti-gingrich ads.
Newt Gingrich is everything that is wrong with our political system in one overweight, ethically pliable package of BS.
Maybe he wants Paul as an option for VP.
As has been reported, Newt has come out lately giving lip-service to the gold standard and praising Ron Paul on his opposition to the FED. At first I thought he was saying nice things about Dr. Paul in an effort to court his supporters. However, is it possible that he'll back Paul in the states where he isn't on ballot, just to prevent Mitt from getting the delegates.
Is it possible that the anti-Mitt wing of the establishment will follow this lead?