Why Rand Paul Should Join the Council on Foreign Relations

There are realists in the CFR, but they're all pro-UN liberals (Huntsman-types).

Basically, the realists want us to give up some of our national sovereignty to the international organisations.

The neocons want us to be subordinated to the government of Israel (Likud party specifically).

Both groups are "internationalists", but neocons are obviously the crazier and more repugnant ones.
 
As a Taft Fan (assuming it's Robert and not William Howard) you must have a beef with the CFR. They ganged up on Taft and "selected" the willing puppet Eisenhower.

And what better way to stop that then to infiltrate it?
 
What better way to stop us then to convince us to support someone working for the enemy under the guise of stopping them? Infiltration can work two ways and it's a dangerous game.

Is this kinda like, "It's dangerous to dance with the devil"?
 
I get disturbed every time that Haass guy is on Morning Joe (he's on a lot there). Besides, there's a difference between being a realist/non-interventionist and a world government type.
 
The article does present a very compelling case. Though I don't know exactly how much influence the CFR wields on electoral politics. I suspect not very much.
 
I think if anything, Rand has to get some credible foreign policy advisors. I'm talking about generals, ambassadors, and professors.
 
c30ff0f9e7a001e054278110.L.jpg
 
If Rand can get invited to Bilderberg he can discreetly provide Alex Jones with the full list of attendees.

I'll say this again and again, but if you look hard enough you'll understand that Bilderberg is the establishment wishing to meet up in a probably unsaid motivation in keeping the current but dying power structure away from competitors such as China and Russia.
 
Back
Top