Why is the USGS suppressing a mag 8.4 earthquake in Libya at 14:49 GMT today?

[Danke]

KYLE: There are thosands of links, it was all over the media. Here is just one:
http://bazfile.blogspot.com/2011/05/there-apparently-is-more-than-degree-of.html

Sunday, May 29, 2011Britain To Use Bunker-Busters Against Gadhafi
There apparently is more than a degree of psychological warfare at play in NATO's stepped up air campaign over Libya.

Britain is not stopping at deploying Apache helicopter gunships -- now London is letting it be known that it is preparing to include 2,000-pound bunker-busters in its arsenal against Moammar Gadhafi.

The Paveway bombs have already been moved to Gioia del Colle in Italy, where RAF Tornado and Typhoon jets are based, The Guardian of London reported. The Paveways are expected to be used to crash through the bunkers beneath Gadhafi's Bab al-Azizia compound in Tripoli, among other underground targets....

"Gadhafi may not be capable of listening but those around him would be wise to do so," Fox said

Those are not nukes.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...rs-for-Libya-mission&highlight=BUNKER-BUSTERS

 

[galantarie]

QUOTE: "When the nuclear warhead bunker-buster missile is shot against the sea-bottom, it can trigger the heaviest earthquakes.
News Source on May 29, 2011

The Guardian reports:

Britain has ratcheted up the pressure on Colonel Muammar Gaddafi by preparing to load heavy “bunker buster” bombs on RAF jets ready to attack his compounds in and around Tripoli.

Paveway bombs, weighing 2,000lbs, the largest in the RAF’s arsenal, have been dispatched to Gioia del Colle in southern Italy where RAF Tornado and Typhoon jets are based. While the Apache’s cannon and Hellfire missiles are used against small or moving targets, the Paveway bombs are expected to be used against bunkers underneath the Gaddafi regime’s Bab al-Azizia compound in Tripoli and elsewhere.

The MoD said on Sunday the enhanced Paveway III bombs, are designed “to punch through the roof or wall of a hardened building”.

 

[galantarie]

DANKE, o yes they are. You Better look things up! I saw your other posts. You seem to be infavor of the War; and do not really care what happens!
AFTERMATH:
an anomalous structure: the sample’s surface includes alluminium and iron silicates, normal elements in a soil fragment. Yet, looking inside, estremely small bubbles can be found with high concentration of iron. Further testing will clarify the origin of these structures: what seems to be certain at the moment is that they are not caused by a natural process.
What kind of weapon is this? What weapon leaves traces of radiation and produces such lethal and circumscribed consequences?
Researcher Dai Williams believes this is a new class of weapons using enriched uranium, not through fission processes but through new physical processes kept secret for at least 20 years.
Physicist Emilio del Giudice from the The Institute of Nuclear Phisics explains the enriched uranium: 1) this material is present in the structure of the bombs.
One should explain the rationale of the use of a material which is both expensive and dangerous , because of its enhanced radioactivity, to people handling it, including military personnel. There is a pdf on these weapons as well.

 

[MelissaWV]

DANKE, o yes they are. You Better look things up! I saw your other posts. You seem to be infavor of the War; and do not really care what happens!

 

[Danke]

! I saw your other posts. You seem to be infavor of the War; and do not really care what happens!

oh really? link?

 

[galantarie]

oh really? link?

Turn back to p. 2---meanwhile I am looking for the pdf. It is past my bedtime here. I do not live in the USA. If I cannot find the pdf tonight, I will post it tomorrow...BUT BELIEVE ME THESE BUNKER BUSTERS ARE NUCLEAR TIPPED WITH DEPLETED URANIUM..and they have been used throughout the Middle East already by the USA/NATO. These weapons are nothing to be sarcastic about. They are amongst the worst; and their effects cannot be erradicated for millions of years. They cause severe burns and genetic disorders and birth defects. The soil becomes permenently contaminated.

 

[galantarie]

The Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP): RNEP is a nuclear weapon that would burrow a few meters into the ground before exploding and thus generate a powerful underground shock wave. Its hypothetical targets are deeply buried command bunkers or underground storage sites containing chemical or biological agents.
The RNEP design: Weapons designers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory intend to use an existing high-yield nuclear warhead—the 1.2-megaton B83 nuclear bomb—in a longer, stronger and heavier bomb casing. The B83 is the largest nuclear weapon in the U.S. arsenal, and nearly 100 times more powerful than the nuclear bomb used on Hiroshima.1
http://www.nukewatch.org/facts/nwd/RNEPFactSheetHiRes.pdf
as of JAN. 2002 "In addition to Russia and China, now North Korea, Iraq, Iran, [B]Syria, and Libya[/B] are on the target list.

 

[tpreitzel]

The original 8.4 earthquake has been allegedly revised to 5.2 due to "malfunctioning" equipment in France, but I still don't understand the European's deleting the original reference to the 8.4 earthquake instead of properly revising it downward to 5.2 .. Anyway, carry onward.

 

[Kylie]

The Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP): RNEP is a nuclear weapon that would burrow a few meters into the ground before exploding and thus generate a powerful underground shock wave. Its hypothetical targets are deeply buried command bunkers or underground storage sites containing chemical or biological agents.
The RNEP design: Weapons designers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory intend to use an existing high-yield nuclear warhead—the 1.2-megaton B83 nuclear bomb—in a longer, stronger and heavier bomb casing. The B83 is the largest nuclear weapon in the U.S. arsenal, and nearly 100 times more powerful than the nuclear bomb used on Hiroshima.1
http://www.nukewatch.org/facts/nwd/RNEPFactSheetHiRes.pdf
as of JAN. 2002 "In addition to Russia and China, now North Korea, Iraq, Iran, [B]Syria, and Libya[/B] are on the target list.

I went through that and moved to an article by Robert. W. Nelson.

Here is a link to all of his writings, the first being what you are talking about.

http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Detail?entitytype=2&searchtype=2&id=2274750&form=BA