He was a bad president, he dealt drugs to finance illegal foreign military manipulations. I personally think George HW bush has been running this country since 1980, though.
Even as a leftist, I recognize the fact that he was a good president, but why all the leg humping by the candidates and media? Why is being Reagan-esque the litmus test?
Why isn't there a progressive idol that the Democrats worship? Why aren't the Democrats held to a similar litmus test for their progressivism?
Reagan was President in name only. Bush Sr. took over 69 days into Reagan's faux presidency.
On March 30, 1981, only 69 days into the new administration, Reagan, was struck by gunfire from a deranged would-be assassin, John Hinckley, Jr. Missing Reagan’s heart by less than one inch.
How many people are aware that the Hinckley's and the Bushes were friends and past business partners? Scott Hinkley was even scheduled to attend a dinner party at the the home of Neil Bush the day after the Reagan shooting. And the "coincidences" get even stranger:http://killtown.911review.org/assassinations/reagan.html
To make a long story short: Reagan's policies were Bush Sr's policies.