Jordan
Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2007
- Messages
- 4,035
Wow, you really don't know how to read charts, do you? The chart you posted was linear, not a log scale graph. It clearly was going up steeply in the 70's and was flat in the 90's, proving my point that gold went up fast while inflation was out of control, and went down as faith in the currency was restored.
You said inflation was subdued prior to the 90s. Which isn't, wasn't, nor will ever be true.
What planet are you living on?
Not sure.
Not going to happen. It would CRUSH the Federal Government. And no, a small figure won't work, it would have to go up to AT LEAST 5% to beat real inflation, and should lending resume and/or should there be a run on the dollar at any point then you will have to raise it to 10, then 20, then 30%. Gold actually increased in value as they raised rates until they finally increased them well above the inflation rate.
The perception of a tight monetary policy is just as good as tight monetary policy.
And what do you think monetization of 13+trillion dollars of debt is going to do the dollar? This is exactly what is going to happen in the end. If you think this is going to happen, then you shouldn't be in anything except for PMs!
Well, it's going to devalue it. But that's better than spending a few hundred billion every year in interest payments overseas. And no, then I shouldn't be investing in anything that won't appreciate. Businesses can appreciate due to inflation.
Your memory must be going. Perhaps the drool is blocking your oxygen supply. I never said that. But you are wrong there as well. Gold is only highly volatile when you include the big drop in the 80's, which occurred as a result of a one time rescue by Volcker, something that CAN NOT BE REPEATED DUE TO THE MASSIVE NATIONAL DEBT. You also fail to recognize that the conditions match those of Weimar Germany in the year leading up to their famous currency collapse, except that we don't have an industrial economy any more (welfare state, increasing government spending, and a massive, unpayable debt).
Excuses, excuses. That one time move wasn't nearly as damaging to stocks as it was gold.
So, then, can I say that stocks are deflation resistant? I want to make excuses too!
I very seriously doubt that. You might be able to afford a stick of gum, or maybe a whole pack if you get lucky in the stock market, but a casket will be out of your reach if you continue on the path of paper without any security. 5% in physical PMs in your possession will ensure your survival, at least.
Paper has done quite well for me in the past 7-8 years. I'm still able to use it at the store, it's still the medium of exchange, and unlike you goldbugs, I'm fairly confident its reign as a medium of exchange will only continue. Sure, maybe it might lose a little value due to inflation, but that's why nearly all of my net worth is invested, to pick up the pieces as they break off each dollar over time. Just as the markets have worked for quite a long time.