White House hints at crackdown on recreational marijuana

Please expound further what you mean by this.

Google it if you don't understand what the phrase means.

That was a long winded way of saying, "no, no dispensaries or legal shops have been raided"

You sound like an Obama supporter. "Obama's not anti gun. You still have your gun right?" :rolleyes:

BTW, March 4th and 5th have passed. (Whether you are intelligent enough to understand it I don't know.) Was the cannabis Cup raided?

They cancelled the event. How could it be raided if it didn't happen? If you were intelligent enough to understand that you wouldn't have made such a ridiculous statement.

Aww, an he send me a widdle neg wep because he just got pwned.

Feel that rage, boy? That's called cognitive dissonance.

The cognitive dissonance is in your own head.
 
Last edited:
They cancelled the event.

Due to weather.

I live in Washington State, there are literally dozens of recreational marijuana shops in every little town. IF they wanted to crack down, they would have already.
 
Dannno, you have put your brain in neutral and you are ignoring whatever doesn't support your worldview. Again the people UNDER Trump are attacking medical marijuana! It doesn't fvcking matter if Trump hasn't "flip flopped" on the issue if he has not stopped the people under him from attacking medical marijuana!

What has actually happened? What we're seeing is Trumps team say whatever, and the media is trying to get people riled up about whatever it was that Trump said. So, the media goes "hey, you, who are in favor of X, well, Trump's spokesman said come confusing thing, and it what that confusing thing actually means is that Trump is definitely going to be 100% against X."

But the media is always lying and what they really feel they have the right to do is to insist that their interpretation of something vague is the only right interpretation.

We really don't know what's going to happen here, but so far, I don't have anything to complain about. Let's complain about actual things.
 
Due to weather.

That doesn't change the fact that it would be impossible to raid a cancelled event. Duh! Also, why the hell are you okay with the feds threatening events like that? Were you sucking your thumb and defending Obama when Rahm Emanuel threatened gun rights just because they never followed through on it?
 
What has actually happened? What we're seeing is Trumps team say whatever, and the media is trying to get people riled up about whatever it was that Trump said. So, the media goes "hey, you, who are in favor of X, well, Trump's spokesman said come confusing thing, and it what that confusing thing actually means is that Trump is definitely going to be 100% against X."

But the media is always lying and what they really feel they have the right to do is to insist that their interpretation of something vague is the only right interpretation.

:rolleyes: So Trump's official spokespersons are now part of the "lying liberal media?"

We really don't know what's going to happen here, but so far, I don't have anything to complain about. Let's complain about actual things.

So next time when a democrat gets in and conservatives raise the alarm because the liberals are threatening gun rights you are going to defend the liberals? :rolleyes:

No. It's fvcking stupid to ignore threats by members of the Trump administration regarding drug laws and just "wait and see" what happens. That's not what liberty minded people do.
 
That doesn't change the fact that it would be impossible to raid a cancelled event. Duh! Also, why the hell are you okay with the feds threatening events like that? Were you sucking your thumb and defending Obama when Rahm Emanuel threatened gun rights just because they never followed through on it?

I am not OK with it. I'm just not freaking out about it. I'll freak out about it when the first medical or recreational is raided.

And I pointed out it was due to weather, in case anyone were to think a threatening letter was to blame.

No. It's fvcking stupid to ignore threats by members of the Trump administration regarding drug laws and just "wait and see" what happens. That's not what liberty minded people do.

Trump said medical should be legal, he wants to leave recreational to the states, and has been for legalization for over a decade. If you understood trump, you would know he isn't going to do something that could be wildly unpopular. So save yourself from an aneurysm and calm down.
 
Last edited:
I am not OK with it. I'm just not freaking out about it. I'll freak out about it when the first medical or recreational is raided.

And I pointed out it was due to weather, in case anyone were to think a threatening letter was to blame.



Trump said medical should be legal, he wants to leave recreational to the states, and has been for legalization for over a decade. If you understood trump, you would know he isn't going to do something that could be wildly unpopular. So save yourself from an aneurysm and calm down.

Duffus, the only person freaking out is you and your fellow Trumpkins. You have an aneurysm anytime anyone criticizes Herr Leader. I simply pointed out the facts and the fact is that surrogates in the Trump administration have attacked medical marijuana. The attacks are in the form of vague threats and now changes in policy to bring back mandatory minimums. I didn't have an aneurysm when Rahm Emanuel said that he'd like to use the no fly list to ban guns. (Something Trump has supported BTW). Not having an aneurysm doesn't mean sitting on your thumbs and/or attacking anyone who raises valid concerns.
 
Duffus, the only person freaking out is you and your fellow Trumpkins.

Wrong

You have an aneurysm anytime anyone criticizes Herr Leader.

Wrong

I simply pointed out the facts and the fact is that surrogates in the Trump administration have attacked medical marijuana. The attacks are in the form of vague threats....

Not vague threats! Oh GOD NO! ALL TEH MARiJUNa is gone now!!

Let me repeat:
Trump said repeatedly medical should be legal. Who was the last president that ever said such a thing?

Trump said repeatedly recreational should be left to the states. Who was the last president that ever said such a thing?

I think it is pretty clear, marijuana will be fine.
 

No I'm not.



No I'm not.


Not vague threats! Oh GOD NO! ALL TEH MARiJUNa is gone now!!

You dishonestly won't address the fact that Obama never went house to house taking guns.

Let me repeat:

Repeat all you want. It's called a straw man argument. The point that I've made is that Trump surrogates have attacked marijuana. Do you know what a surrogate is? Now here's the comparison to Obama. Obama on guns:



Obama surrogate on guns:



So is your position now that Obama was really good on guns?
 
Accuses me of strawmen fallacies.

Keeps wanting to talk about guns instead of marijuana.

Can't we talk about both.

what if I want to smoke a bowl while building a 1911? (and YES, I do)

I am not a supporter or detractor of Trump.
I just want some consistency.
 
That doesn't change the fact that it would be impossible to raid a cancelled event. Duh! Also, why the hell are you okay with the feds threatening events like that? Were you sucking your thumb and defending Obama when Rahm Emanuel threatened gun rights just because they never followed through on it?

Jm, you should just give up. S/he is not gonna get it.
 
Let me repeat:
Trump said repeatedly medical should be legal. Who was the last president that ever said such a thing?

Trump said repeatedly recreational should be left to the states. Who was the last president that ever said such a thing?

I think it is pretty clear, marijuana will be fine.

Then why is his pick as A.G. not repeating the same thing?
 
Jm, you should just give up. S/he is not gonna get it.

I know. But I'm not going to let Trumpskiites takeover.

Then why is his pick as A.G. not repeating the same thing?

^This. Seriously it's simple. I've never accused Trump of taking a position one way or another on marijuana. I've accused his surrogates (some) of taking bad positions. Wasn't Trump's appeal that he knows how to "surround himself with the best people?"
 
Accuses me of strawmen fallacies.

Keeps wanting to talk about guns instead of marijuana.

It's called "reasoning by analogy" but I guess that's too much for your mind to process? The principle is this. Just like I didn't accept the Obamabot excuse that attacks coming from the Obama administration against guns didn't matter unless door to door gun confiscation took place, I don't accept the Trumpskiite excuse that attacks coming from the Trump administration against medical marijuana don't matter unless dispensaries get raided. Got it? No I'm sure you don't. Higher order reasoning is tough for Trumpskiites.
 
Here's the latest from Sessions. If he keeps the Cole Memo largely intact that would be very good news.


Sessions Says Obama Marijuana Memo Is 'Valid'

by Tom Angell
March 15th, 2017




U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions is indicating that he might keep Obama-era marijuana enforcement guidelines in place, perhaps with some modifications.

"The Cole Memorandum set up some policies under President Obama's Department of Justice about how cases should be selected in those states and what would be appropriate for federal prosecution, much of which I think is valid," he said in a question-and-answer session with reporters on Wednesday following a speech in Richmond, Virginia.

That memo, adopted in 2013, lays out guidelines for how states can avoid federal interference with their marijuana laws.

Sessions added that he "may have some different ideas myself in addition to that" but indicated that the federal government would not be able to enforce its remaining marijuana prohibition laws across the board in states with legalization.

"Essentially we’re not able to go into a state and pick up the work that the police and sheriffs have been doing for decades," he said.

...


read more:
https://massroots.com/blog/sessions-says-obama-marijuana-memo-is-valid
 
Mr. "Good people don't smoke pot" can't force his personal morality on the whole country. And he knows it. Sucks to be him. That doesn't mean he won't try.

He's a drug warrior through and through. But he can't win this one.
The key phrase there was "we aren't able." Not that he wouldn't, but that he doesn't have the capabilities to do that right now.
 
Back
Top