Which Non-Paul GOP Candidate Still Running Would Be The Most Offensive 2012 Nominee?
- Thread starter RonPaulFanInGA
- Start date
opinionatedfool
Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2011
- Messages
- 2,340
Gingrich for sure.
AhuwaleKaNaneHuna
Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2012
- Messages
- 654
An "All the Above" option would've been nice.
Even though all 3 are far beyond where I draw my line for a candidate being offensive, Romney got my vote because I think he is the worst kind.
The others at least are public about what makes them offensive.
Romney, poses as being the nice business man next door who is on your side and shares your views and concerns. Then he screws you behind your back.
Even though all 3 are far beyond where I draw my line for a candidate being offensive, Romney got my vote because I think he is the worst kind.
The others at least are public about what makes them offensive.
Romney, poses as being the nice business man next door who is on your side and shares your views and concerns. Then he screws you behind your back.
RonPaulFanInGA
Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 12,749
No cop-out possibilities. Too many polls here have those, and they're meaningless. No multiple choice, no "all of the above" or "so-and-so is a douchebag" options. Anyone that votes should have to make a choice. Imagine that.
Wanted to unequivocally see whom is most reviled here between Gingrich and Santorum. Knew Romney wouldn't win, but stuck his name in the poll anyway.
There is a very good chance that this is true. Would Gingrich be winning, if this poll was created shortly after his win in South Carolina? Probably.
Last edited:
Txrose4ever
Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2011
- Messages
- 150
Without a doubt, Santorum. I'd even vote Obama to keep him out........ Eeewwwwww
agorist ninja
Member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2010
- Messages
- 353
They're all the same. Every single one of them will do what their banking/corporate/MIC masters demand.
Wake up.
Wake up.
ctiger2
Member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2008
- Messages
- 5,570
Yup, too EZ. Gingrich is on my short list of world's worst humans.
cheapseats
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Messages
- 7,502
Wake up, indeed.
The presumption that all of THEM are the same is as fallacious as the presumption that all of YOU are the same. Which, ironically, IS what some non-paul-people think. And those who DO paint Ron Paul Supporters with a broad brush do NOT use a flattering color, fyi.
Mormon #MittRomney is NOT a carbon copy of Zipper Problem #Newt Gingrich.
I am on record: I will not only VOTE for Obama, I will BAT for Obama if Gingrich is the nominee.
cheapseats
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Messages
- 7,502
Not least 'cuz of his #EVANGELISM.
Blah, blah, blah, yada, yada, yada about his moral flexibility. HEARD it, and agree.
He is STILL not in the same SHAMELESS SLEAZEBALL league as #NewtGingrich.
The Gold Standard
Member
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 3,188
This and +rep.
AggieforPaul
Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2007
- Messages
- 969
Santorum. They'e all bad, but he's especially sick on foreign policy, and I dont like his extreme social conservatism.
cheapseats
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Messages
- 7,502
I will suggest that only people who have been DESENSITIZED to "holy" wars by steadily VIEWING them rather than FIGHTING them would anticipate a showdown between Socialists and Evangelicals as COMICAL.
Sensory Indoctrination.
No question in my mind WHO the most dangerous man in this race is.
He oozes oil, sleaze and will change his entire stance on ethical issues to suit the situation. He'll sit at his wife's side, holding her hand and tell a group of "worried" women that they can "COUNT on him", that he will ALWAYS be pro-choice. and within months of deciding to become a GOP president he's on a different video holding a little baby (nice touch) promising conservatives they can "count on him" to keep his NEW pro-life stance.
My disgust is NOT over whatever Mr. Romney's real position is on this controversial issue. It is over his sliminess and hypocrisy and how he made commercials using the "true believer" pro-choice ladies and next an innocent baby as "props" and pawns in his "power grab".
Mr. Romney is the ONLY candidate to "proudly" proclaim his support of and ACTUALLY justify supporting NDAA. He was all huffy and all haughty, like...if HE supports it...we should know is "for our own good". Arrogant pr---!
Mr. Romney is the ONLY one to call Obama--who has been a da*ned effective killer of brown-skinned people unfortunate enough to live around oil fields--"too timid". And the ONLY ONE to flat out lie and say that China has a larger NAVY <than we do> to justify HIS DESIRE to INCREASE military spending and the number of active duty servicemen when HE is president. The truth IS We have a larger military forces and more and better equipment than the next 18 largest world forces in the world COMBINED. Asserting in a debate that ANYONE has a larger military force or more equipment than WE DO is LYING.
There is a REASON Romney wants to build up our armed forces. Mr. Romney is an imperialist...a PROUD IMPERIALIST...that brags about how he is getting to make us stronger than our thousands of MULTIPLE WAR HEADS capable of blowing up the world several times over make us. He is the ONLY candidate to specify in speeches and on web pages how he is going to ADD active duty people, aircraft carriers, ships and war planes. Just what EVERY country on the brink of economic collapse most needs. If things at home get bad...distract the masses with some WAR.
Like OBAMA before him, Mr. Romney has been purchased by the BANKERS, the CORPORATE INTERESTS and the MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX (not the active duty soldiers...the industries than manufacture and make money building war equipment). Every SINGLE bank that was BAILED OUT during the 2008 crisis is ON MR. ROMNEY'S TOP DONOR LIST. They will expect something BACK for their investment.
Rick and Newt COMBINED didn't receive even CLOSE to the tiniest of a fraction of what Obama or Romney got from the "cartel".
If none of these facts about Mr. Romney don't scare you, they should.
Follow the money. It always leads to the worst evil.
He oozes oil, sleaze and will change his entire stance on ethical issues to suit the situation. He'll sit at his wife's side, holding her hand and tell a group of "worried" women that they can "COUNT on him", that he will ALWAYS be pro-choice. and within months of deciding to become a GOP president he's on a different video holding a little baby (nice touch) promising conservatives they can "count on him" to keep his NEW pro-life stance.
My disgust is NOT over whatever Mr. Romney's real position is on this controversial issue. It is over his sliminess and hypocrisy and how he made commercials using the "true believer" pro-choice ladies and next an innocent baby as "props" and pawns in his "power grab".
Mr. Romney is the ONLY candidate to "proudly" proclaim his support of and ACTUALLY justify supporting NDAA. He was all huffy and all haughty, like...if HE supports it...we should know is "for our own good". Arrogant pr---!
Mr. Romney is the ONLY one to call Obama--who has been a da*ned effective killer of brown-skinned people unfortunate enough to live around oil fields--"too timid". And the ONLY ONE to flat out lie and say that China has a larger NAVY <than we do> to justify HIS DESIRE to INCREASE military spending and the number of active duty servicemen when HE is president. The truth IS We have a larger military forces and more and better equipment than the next 18 largest world forces in the world COMBINED. Asserting in a debate that ANYONE has a larger military force or more equipment than WE DO is LYING.
There is a REASON Romney wants to build up our armed forces. Mr. Romney is an imperialist...a PROUD IMPERIALIST...that brags about how he is getting to make us stronger than our thousands of MULTIPLE WAR HEADS capable of blowing up the world several times over make us. He is the ONLY candidate to specify in speeches and on web pages how he is going to ADD active duty people, aircraft carriers, ships and war planes. Just what EVERY country on the brink of economic collapse most needs. If things at home get bad...distract the masses with some WAR.
Like OBAMA before him, Mr. Romney has been purchased by the BANKERS, the CORPORATE INTERESTS and the MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX (not the active duty soldiers...the industries than manufacture and make money building war equipment). Every SINGLE bank that was BAILED OUT during the 2008 crisis is ON MR. ROMNEY'S TOP DONOR LIST. They will expect something BACK for their investment.
Rick and Newt COMBINED didn't receive even CLOSE to the tiniest of a fraction of what Obama or Romney got from the "cartel".
If none of these facts about Mr. Romney don't scare you, they should.
Follow the money. It always leads to the worst evil.
Last edited:
Similar threads
