Which Non-Paul GOP Candidate Still Running Would Be The Most Offensive 2012 Nominee?

Which Non-Paul GOP Candidate Still Running Would Be The Most Offensive 2012 Nominee?

  • Gingrich

    Votes: 56 38.4%
  • Romney

    Votes: 8 5.5%
  • Santorum

    Votes: 82 56.2%

  • Total voters
    146
  • Poll closed .
No question in my mind WHO the most dangerous man in this race is...

...Mr. Romney is an imperialist...a PROUD IMPERIALIST...


So are ALL of the Oppressors.

So, fundamentally, are ALL of the Movers & Shakers in the Military Industrial Complex and, when you get right down to it, so are all of the INVESTORS and EMPLOYEES in that MARKET SECTOR.

So is Newt Gingrich, of the "big ideas".

Newt Gingrich has the most INFERIOR CHARACTER on that stage.
 
Last edited:
But, the worst of the worst, every single one of the "Too Big to Fail" Financial Institutions is SUPPORTING Romney. They've given Mr. Romney MORE MONEY than they've given to ALL of the other candidates COMBINED.

Which tells exactly WHO has promised to give the "Too Big to Fails" MOST for their investment.

The "Too Big to Fails" are the guys who deserve to go to jail because their greed brought ALL OF THE WORLD to the brink of a financial collapse we have YET to get over. Their escapades have burdened out children and their children with trillions of dollars of tax debt. While THEIR CEOs got HUGE million and billion dollar bonuses.

I vote for Obama before I'd vote for Mr. Romney.

And I'd cut off my hand before I'd cast a vote for Obama or Newt or Rick. Romney is bottom of the barrel is a NOT very fresh barrel of ripe garbage. Not possible to find anyone worse.

In my opinion.
 
Bottom line. I wouldn't vote for Romney or Newt, or Rick or Obama under ANY circumstances. Not ever.

But, IF there is a WORSE one, always, always, follow the money.

Who the CROOKS trust to DO the DEED is always the "baddest" <the guy with the LEAST moral core> of the bunch.
 
Last edited:
But, the worst of the worst, every single one of the "Too Big to Fail" Financial Institutions is SUPPORTING Romney. They've given Mr. Romney MORE MONEY than they've given to ALL of the other candidates COMBINED.

Which tells exactly WHO has promised to give the "Too Big to Fails" MOST for their investment.


Um...these are the biggest of the Big Boys. Are you suggesting that #NewtGingrich and #RickSantorum CAN somewhat repel their craftiness?

The flip side of THEY'RE ALL THE SAME is that #BigMoney will have their way with any of them, yes? I realize YOU are saying #Romney is worse, but I disagree.



The "Too Big to Fails" are the guys who deserve to go to jail because their greed brought ALL OF THE WORLD to the brink of a financial collapse we have YET to get over. Their escapades have burdened out children and their children with trillions of dollars of tax debt. While THEIR CEOs got HUGE million and billion dollar bonuses.

You betcha. Wonder why Ron Paul never calls for prosecution and incarceration of White Collar Criminals, nor SEIZURE OF ILL-GOTTEN GAINS.



I vote for Obama before I'd vote for Mr. Romney.

And I'd cut off my hand before I'd cast a vote for Obama or Newt or Rick. Romney is bottom of the barrel is a NOT very fresh barrel of ripe garbage. Not possible to find anyone worse.

In my opinion.

I recall reading in another thread that several Board Members propose to KILL THEMSELVES if Ron Paul is not the nominee, others that profess they'd KILL THEMSELVES before voting for any mortal but the incomparable Ron Paul.

Each to his own, LIVE AND LET DIE, but it does not resonate as Truth.
 
Last edited:
In terms of foreign and fiscal policy, Gingrich. In terms of social issues and liberty, Rick "I watch you in your bedroom" Santorum.
 
Gingrich because he might have a CHANCE to beat Obama. Santorum has zero chance, and Gingrich wants to bomb every country in the world.

Mitt wants to bomb Iran, but I don't think he wants to bomb other countries.

Either way, if it's not Paul the GOP must lose unless Rand has the kahunas to challenge the incumbent.
 
HERE'S some irony for ya...

Y'all can't coalesce behind one thing any better than Republican Rank & File.
 
Whatttttt??????

I'm NOT going to cut off my hand OR kill myself.

I WILL refuse to contribute to our nations corruption by voting FOR Obama, Newt, Rick AND ESPECIALLY NOT for Romney.

I couldn't look my children in the eyes ever again if I did.

The LESSER of evils is still evil.

I will not be part of it.
 
Last edited:
No question in my mind WHO the most dangerous man in this race is.

He oozes oil, sleaze and will change his entire stance on ethical issues to suit the situation. He'll sit at his wife's side, holding her hand and tell a group of "worried" women that they can "COUNT on him", that he will ALWAYS be pro-choice. and within months of deciding to become a GOP president he's on a different video holding a little baby (nice touch) promising conservatives they can "count on him" to keep his NEW pro-life stance.

My disgust is NOT over whatever Mr. Romney's real position is on this controversial issue. It is over his sliminess and hypocrisy and how he made commercials using the "true believer" pro-choice ladies and next an innocent baby as "props" and pawns in his "power grab".

Mr. Romney is the ONLY candidate to "proudly" proclaim his support of and ACTUALLY justify supporting NDAA. He was all huffy and all haughty, like...if HE supports it...we should know is "for our own good". Arrogant pr---!

Mr. Romney is the ONLY one to call Obama--who has been a da*ned effective killer of brown-skinned people unfortunate enough to live around oil fields--"too timid". And the ONLY ONE to flat out lie and say that China has a larger NAVY <than we do> to justify HIS DESIRE to INCREASE military spending and the number of active duty servicemen when HE is president. The truth IS We have a larger military forces and more and better equipment than the next 18 largest world forces in the world COMBINED. Asserting in a debate that ANYONE has a larger military force or more equipment than WE DO is LYING.

There is a REASON Romney wants to build up our armed forces. Mr. Romney is an imperialist...a PROUD IMPERIALIST...that brags about how he is getting to make us stronger than our thousands of MULTIPLE WAR HEADS capable of blowing up the world several times over make us. He is the ONLY candidate to specify in speeches and on web pages how he is going to ADD active duty people, aircraft carriers, ships and war planes. Just what EVERY country on the brink of economic collapse most needs. If things at home get bad...distract the masses with some WAR.

Like OBAMA before him, Mr. Romney has been purchased by the BANKERS, the CORPORATE INTERESTS and the MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX (not the active duty soldiers...the industries than manufacture and make money building war equipment). Every SINGLE bank that was BAILED OUT during the 2008 crisis is ON MR. ROMNEY'S TOP DONOR LIST. They will expect something BACK for their investment.

Rick and Newt COMBINED didn't receive even CLOSE to the tiniest of a fraction of what Obama or Romney got from the "cartel".

If none of these facts about Mr. Romney don't scare you, they should.

Follow the money. It always leads to the worst evil.

I COMPLETELY AGREE.

It's not just the above that earned him my vote for most scariest really. It's that so many people are easily fooled by him and don't see it, that makes him the most scary. It seems so many are blinded by his white shit eating grin and shiny coifed hair. If he some how gets elected, and seeing how good he is at buying elections , he may have a shot at Obama, we won't be able to come here and post, "I told you so" to the others, because free speech internet will be gone.
 
Tough choice between the man with no morals, and the man that wants to force his morals into our lives under threat of a gun
 
Tough choice between the man with no morals, and the man that wants to force his morals into our lives under threat of a gun


The man with NO morals will ALSO resort to Force to establish his Order.

The man with NO morals is more apt to turbo-charge Force with sadism and capriciousness. NO morals. NO holds barred.
 
Lessee, do I want to eat horse manure or pig pooh....mmmm...tough decision....
 
Santorum by a longshot. Theocrat meets nanny state big government warmonger. Ugh.
 
Reading this thread, it is easier to understand why Ron Paul's camp has been UNABLE to knock out such "equally bad" opponents.
 
It's like asking if you'd rather be boiled alive, tar and feathered, or hanged. You're going to die horribly either way, what's the point? The whole lesser of evils thing just irks me, Don't vote or vote third party. Don't fall for the throwing away you're vote BS, vote for who YOU want on the issues YOU care about and tell your friends and family to do the same.
 
WHY CAN'T RON PAUL KNOCK OUT THIS MISERABLE COMPETITION?

SIMPLE.

IT IS ALL A FARCE AND IT IS RIGGED.

Nobody needs to worry about Santorum OR Newt getting ANYWHERE. The powers that bought Romney OR Obama will no more LET Santorum win than they would Ron Paul or Newt.

It wasn't an ACCIDENT that the night before the South Carolina primary, (where Newt was expected to roll up BIG numbers) Gingerich's ex did a tell-all which included Newt's "open marriage" request. (Not saying Newt isn't a dog-pig husband that I despise. I am saying the talky ex was pulled out at a moment "somebody" hoped would make slick, Yankee Mr. Romney NOT look NOT AS BAD, because even a sissy Yankee is better than a "rounder" hound that you "can't keep on the porch".)

Nor was it an accident that when Cain's numbers soared, the woman he had bought off over a decade ago got "dug up" and despite a "written agreement" things about Cain's indiscretions started to "slip out". And when that didn't pull his numbers down, MORE women got dug up. Even though Cain had been campaigning for MONTHS without them coming forward.

The "Too Big to Fails" INVESTED (probably a LOT more behind the scenes than what has been revealed) and come heck or high water, they are going to make sure they end up with one of "their" boys <Mr. Romney or Obama> to keep whatever they need coming their way.

Whether through fudged caucuses, black-outs of "dangerous" competition that can't be bought, digging up ex-wives with juicy dirt to share, bringing out newsletters from 20 years ago, digging up mistresses, only allowing IN candidates with ridiculous stances like controlling contraception devices...WHATEVER it takes...

Follow the money. Anything and everything will be DONE to assure the corportate interests and bankers that their HANDMAIDENS, Romney or Obama, end up in power.

People got fooled by Obama with his nice suits, progressive message (which he didn't implement) and his great speeches. Romney is just a greasier looking version of the same--how the bankers think conservative Republicans should look. Same animal, just dressed up and trotted out with messages to win over the selected markets.

The primaries are pre-scripted just like episodes of "The Hills" or "The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills". Sometimes a snag comes up, like when a "real housewife" husband committed suicide OR like when it turns out a lot of Republicans sniff out Romney's phoney conservatism and have been desperately voting for everything ELSE that moves.

But, just like the Real Housewife producers edited out scenes with the "departed" husband and the show "went on" the GOP machine has been taking care of their complications and impediments so their show will "go on" as pre-planned.

In my opinion.
 
Last edited:
It's like asking if you'd rather be boiled alive, tar and feathered, or hanged. You're going to die horribly either way, what's the point? The whole lesser of evils thing just irks me, Don't vote or vote third party. Don't fall for the throwing away you're vote BS, vote for who YOU want on the issues YOU care about and tell your friends and family to do the same.

This and + rep from me.
 
Back
Top