What's your 2016 plan?

Bryan

Admin
Staff member
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
8,781
The 2016 elections are next in line and it's not too early to be thinking about a plan for being involved, ones goal here should be to help shape the world not just be a victim of it. Figuring out the who, where, what and "how much to do" however is the crux of good planning and will make a huge difference in the pay-back of your precise resources of time and money.

Some open questions for site members...
  • While 2016 is a presentational election year, how much will you focus on it vs. other local races?
  • Are there any strong up-and-coming congressional candidates that are worth supporting?
  • Will you work to be a national delegate for your district?
  • Have you networked with other liberty supporters in your district to build a local plan?
  • Beyond being a delegate, what actions will have the best payback for supporting a presidential candidate, such as Rand Paul?
  • Are you working to become an expert in some area that is of value to advancing liberty?
  • What other questions should one be asking?

Onward!
 
Will you work to be a national delegate for your district? - how do I do this?
 
Hm. Good question. I'll more likely focus on issues rather than seats. Will have initiatives in many areas of the nation happening and education relative to the process itself is critical. Of course, there is much to be said for this. It's a lot of work, really. But its how we generate accountability that demands it right back. Have to learn to walk before we run. Right?
 
No plans for 2016. Have concluded that elections are just scams to fool the slaves into thinking they run the plantation.

Tod, you know, you take a guy like Ron Paul who is retired from political service and if we look at what he's doing, he's getting more done now that he's out of office than he ever did. And he has a global audience. An informed audience at that. One that is removed from the sideshow that is the very model of the mainstream. Being able to focus on the things that he finds important has allowed him to get more done now than he ever did. He's communicating in a broad way. You know? While in office, he had to cater to every person and their pet peeves on a daily basis. And so this is why political people don't ever get anything practical done. Counting seats, as I'd mentioned previously, simply doesn't get it done in the way that counting the issues does.

So, I suppose that I know what you mean in an off sort of way.

Now, that is not to say that there isn't anything to be accomplished by becoming a delegate or providing a similar function in the election process. There certainly is. But the path holds many forks along the way until the road comes together again. In fact, the road may not come together again without them. And so that's an interesting phenomenon in itself.
 
Last edited:
No plans for 2016. Have concluded that elections are just scams to fool the slaves into thinking they run the plantation.

I think I'm going to continue to focus locally, and spreading ideas of indepence that are easier for some to implement by themselves than through the government. Though, I will continue to help candidates with messaging and having fun Photoshopping stuff and video editing videos when asked or if a request arises.
 
As far as I can tell right now there will be no quality candidates on the local level in my area. I will work for the best liberty candidate on the national / presidential level. I will start with the Iowa straw poll and then the caucus. The best candidate will most likely be Rand Paul.I will do my best to make sure the liberty candidate for president wins my county. That's about the best I can do from where I am. I'm not sure if I will be a national delegate to the RNC but I will be a delegate up to the state convention.
 
Not sure yet. I've done a lot of phone banking from home for Ron in 2008 and 2012, and I did that for another campaign in 2004. I also donated lots of money in all of those campaigns. I'm pretty burned out and disillusioned, to be honest...and I don't have the funds to donate a lot anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
If you can't be on the ground in the target states going door-to-door, then this is the next best thing. Thank you for your hard work, because phone banking is one of the activities that help us win.

Phone banking (even though its really not "banking" like in candidate elections) has proven successful in the area of awareness with regard to ballot initiatives and that kind of thing too. Very successful. And, of course, we define success in broad ways. The ability to stimulate people to become active in the issues themselves has shown to produce elevated activity with regard to education relative to those initiatives as well as promote physical drive to take advantage of that particular pathway for citizens who wish to bring forth their own bills. All aspects too. Legal, networking, basically process as a whole whereas our representatives don't even take the time to read the things, much less provide a position on them aside from a yea or a nay in the wee hours of midnight. Is naive to think that change is only accomplished by way of who gets a seat in office, Matt. I know that you will disagree but that just is what it is. You're free to disagree.

And, really, this is one of the issues that I have with your classes. What they do, after screening people on specific issues, is that they take young people who were stimulated to become active in that way based upon their individual perception of the issues and causes that they hold dear as a result of becoming introduced to Ron and others and they train them to start pushing the issues that the educators themselves view as important and happen to be aligned with their own vision to scope. Right to work and that kind of thing. And so then what happens is that these young people who were compelled to go that route never truly ever get to function in the way that they thought that they would. They lose the connection to the issues that brought them to make the move in the first place. And I've always wondered if Ron knew what was/is happening when young people came to him and ask him what they could do to help his cause or to promote the issues that they happen to agree with him on. Things that he believes that they have decided that they, too, would like to see evolve into dialogue at the next level. When Ron sends these youth your way, does he know that very little of the things that he has fought for or those same things that these youth have learned from him is never really even worked toward? You have to admit that most who teach these classes actually disagree with many of Ron's positions. Specifically with regard to foreign policy. I doubt that the issue is even ever discussed. Right?

I suppose that the classes could be beneficial in some way but I'd maintain that they also create a conflict of interest between young people who look to learn how to become involved with the issues that they hold dear an those who teach the classes who may have other things in mind. Personal political goals that they would rather use these youth for. I think its a shame that this happens. And I know that you know that this does happen. And this kind of thing is really what leads me to go another path. Youth musn't be dissuaded from expecting accountbility on the issues themselves.
 
Last edited:
Is naive to think that change is only accomplished by way of who gets a seat in office, Matt. I know that you will disagree but that just is what it is. You're free to disagree.
No, I don't disagree.... but political change consists of two parts: election season and legislative season. In legislative season, if they don't do what you want, then there must be a price for bad behavior during election season.
 
If you can't be on the ground in the target states going door-to-door, then this is the next best thing. Thank you for your hard work, because phone banking is one of the activities that help us win.

passout.gif


+rep. Was that really so hard?
 
No, I don't disagree.... but political change consists of two parts: election season and legislative season. In legislative season, if they don't do what you want, then there must be a price for bad behavior during election season.

PAC structure is degrading pack structure. And so that is about as nutshell as I can say it. I don't like PAC structure. It contradicts what you're saying here.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top