What Will Tom And Lew Say About The Debate?

[Origanalist]

Their circle jerk is superior to y'all's.

How do you rate circle jerks? Are there judges?

 

[heavenlyboy34]

Its a shame I cant rep you for this
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to r3volution 3.0 again.

But that is basically what they do in their oh so boring podcasts. They throw in the obligatory backhanded compliment at Rand then proceed to nitpick at everything he did not say perfectly and finish by giving a big wet sloppy ass kissing to Trump.

I don't listen to Tom's podcast regularly, but you and Rev3 are indeed sticking to what he calls the "3x5 index card of Allowable Opinion". Darned shame coming from fellas on a RP forum. Ron would be disappoint.

 

[Origanalist]

Its a shame I cant rep you for this
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to r3volution 3.0 again.

But that is basically what they do in their oh so boring podcasts. They throw in the obligatory backhanded compliment at Rand then proceed to nitpick at everything he did not say perfectly and finish by giving a big wet sloppy ass kissing to Trump.

Well, that sucks. I haven't listened to or read either for a while, I didn't know they became so petty. If that's true about Tom I has the sads.

 

[heavenlyboy34]

How do you rate circle jerks? Are there judges?

It's entirely subjective and primarily depends on my mood at rating time. I'm the only judge, AFAIK.

 

[heavenlyboy34]

Well, that sucks. I haven't listened to or read either for a while, I didn't know they became so petty. If that's true about Tom I has the sads.

They haven't. jules and Rev3 are just butthurt other prominent people aren't stepping in line with Approved Opinion and Acceptable Behavior.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

I don't listen to Tom's podcast regularly, but you and Rev3 are indeed sticking to what he calls the "3x5 index card of Allowable Opinion".

It's "allowable opinion" to support Rand Paul for President?

Darned shame coming from fellas on a RP forum. Ron would be disappoint

I guess Ron too sticks to that darn index card, having endorsed Rand..

 

[heavenlyboy34]

It's "allowable opinion" to support Rand Paul for President?

Read the post you quoted before responding. You just made yourself look positively foolish.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

They haven't. jules and Rev3 are just butthurt other prominent people aren't stepping in line with Approved Opinion and Acceptable Behavior.

Have you ever contemplated the possibility that you're of only average intelligence?

 

[afwjam]

My god it feels like middle school around here. We are here because we like Liberty, what's the problem? It's like we aren't allowed to having differing opinions around here or something.

 

[eleganz]

I'm glad Tom Woods and Lew Rockwell are finally coming back to their roots, its been a long time.

Welcome back Tom and Lew!

 

[r3volution 3.0]

I'm glad Tom Woods and Lew Rockwell are finally coming back to their roots, its been a long time.

Welcome back Tom and Lew!

What, have they posted something which isn't mindless hatred of Rand?

 

[specsaregood]

I'm glad Tom Woods and Lew Rockwell are finally coming back to their roots, its been a long time.

Welcome back Tom and Lew!

Maybe they'll collaborate on some racist newsletters next.

 

[heavenlyboy34]

Have you ever contemplated the possibility that you're of only average intelligence?

Another off-topic, silly post. Silly plebian boy!

Put this in a thread in which it is relevant, and I will consider answering it.

 

[eleganz]

What, have they posted something which isn't mindless hatred of Rand?

I don't know, I'm just saying the opposite of what makes sense just so I can prove a point.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

^^^ah, sarcasm fail on my part

 

[Origanalist]

They haven't. jules and Rev3 are just butthurt other prominent people aren't stepping in line with Approved Opinion and Acceptable Behavior.

I'm not surprised at Lew because I understand his philosophy. But Tom Woods is not Lew Rockwell.

Or maybe I'm just projecting on Tom.

 

[heavenlyboy34]

Maybe they'll collaborate on some racist newsletters next.

I see the newsletters are a commonly used tool to dismiss the substance of what Lew has to say. What is so horrible in the newsletters that it warrants all the strawmanning and other foolish attacks? Interesting how y'all play the looney left's game of shouting "RACIST!" to shut people up...

 

[r3volution 3.0]

I'm not surprised at Lew because I understand his philosophy. But Tom Woods is not Lew Rockwell.

Or maybe I'm just projecting on Tom.

Tom's a nice guy and a good historian.

The problem is...he doesn't know a god damned thing about politics and needs to shut his fucking yap on that subject.

...I hold out some hope for his rehabilitation.

Lew, on the other hand, is altogether worthless and incorrigible.

 

[Origanalist]

Tom's a nice guy and a good historian.

The problem is...he doesn't know a god damned thing about politics and needs to shut his fucking yap on that subject.

...I hold out some hope for his rehabilitation.

Lew, on the other hand, is altogether worthless and incorrigible.

But, but, but,
he's a legend...

 

[heavenlyboy34]

Tom's a nice guy and a good historian.

The problem is...he doesn't know a god damned thing about politics and needs to shut his fucking yap on that subject.

...I hold out some hope for his rehabilitation.

Lew, on the other hand, is altogether worthless and incorrigible.

Silly r3v post +1. Ya ought to tell RP that, as he reads LRC daily-and is a long-time trusted friend and colleague with Lew. Dat RP must be stoopid!