What should be rebuttal #1 to the neocons RE: Iran

[economics102]

"You were wrong about Iraq. Wrong about Afghanistan. Wrong about the war on terror. If in fact *I* am wrong about Iran, it is too bad there's no one left with any credibility to make that argument against me."

 

[Elwar]

"You were wrong about Iraq. Wrong about Afghanistan. Wrong about the war on terror. If in fact *I* am wrong about Iran, it is too bad there's no one left with any credibility to make that argument against me."

Rebuttal should be:

Check out the big ass moneybomb on December 16th bitch.

 

[tremendoustie]

Lol.

I like to point out that Bachmann blatantly lied twice in order to prop up her pathetic fearmongering and warmongering -- first about the UN report, then about what Ahmadinejad said.

 

[wgadget]

Mention all the fact check articles that show Ron is right and Bachmann is wrong. There are several threads on it.

 

[Standing Liberty]

Not too long ago, Republicans use to run on
getting us out of wars (Ike), today, the neocons
who were Democrates back then, want to get
into more wars.

 

[JohnGalt23g]

Tell them for all their steroid-addled, knuckle-dragging bravado, the fact is we can't afford a war with Iran, sanctions won't work, our allies won't go along with us, and bombing won't stop them from developing a bomb.

In short, tell them that whether they like it or not, Iran is getting the bomb. So we had better be prepared to engage in diplomacy with them.

Like the rest of the world does.

 

[RonPaulMania]

"Our Founding Fathers did not want entangling alliances. We can't afford it. We're broke. Iran can't attack us"

Turn everything into our debt, the vision of the founding fathers.

 

[MadOdorMachine]

Are the American people ready for $7 - $10 for a gallon of gas and potential war with China and Russia? Can we afford it?

 

[kylejack]

I noticed the Frothy One again said that the Iranians started the war in 1979, even though Ron corrected him to 1953 last time.

 

[shrugged0106]

#1 response: How ya gonna pay for it?

 

[wistfulthinker]

"You were wrong about Iraq. Wrong about Afghanistan. Wrong about the war on terror. If in fact *I* am wrong about Iran, it is too bad there's no one left with any credibility to make that argument against me."

Nice!

 

[ThePursuitOfLiberty]

How about:

"Let Israel deal with their security. If the American Media is talking about them being month's away from a nuclear weapon, what do you think Israel knows? They have one of the most effective intelligence agencies the world has ever seen. They know just as much - if not more - than we do. If they feel that they are threatened, they have the military power and might to take care of the problem."

 

[go_cardinals11]

linked on drudge.... Bachmann a "winner" and Paul a "loser".....grrrrr....... http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...rs-and-losers/2011/12/15/gIQA2lfCxO_blog.html

 

[pmbug]

 

[RonPaul101.com]

I think RP can even appease the neocon audience while sticking to his position on foreign policy. He should take their pipe dreaming about a war with Iran and turn it the other way. He should say, "IF" we were attacked, IF another country declared war on America as President I would make it the biggest regret of their short-lived lives. However, "I respect" our brave American soldiers enough to not put them in harms way unless it is necessary to defend the lives of our citizens.