What Really Happened in Benghazi

[LJC4Liberty]

This information was passed on to me tonight. I cannot confirm the source. In liberty, I believe I must pass it on...

According to sources in the State Department and the CIA, and intercepted communications from the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama "staged" the attack in Benghazi in order to create a monumental "October Surprise" that would guarantee him re-election.

Yes, you read that right, and no, I'm not making this up. Obama, we now know, is and has been working with the Muslim Brotherhood secretly to engineer the release of the "Blind Sheik," Omar Abdel Rahman, the mastermind behind the 1993 World Trade Center attack.

In Obama's October Surprise, he intentionally set up the consulate to have no security so that Chris Stevens could be kidnapped, and held for ransom by Al-Qaeda (and the Muslim Brotherhood). Then, several days before the election, the plan was to trade Chris Stevens for the Blind Sheik, making himself look like a hero, and all but guaranteeing re-election.

This was one of the top reasons why Obama was so insistent on the Muslim Brotherhood getting $1.2 Billion in U.S. Aid. They were to have a primary role in getting Obama re-elected. That is why, even though they knew days before the attack that it was going to occur, no effort was made to bolster security. It was intended to be non-existent. The Libyan security forces were intended to quietly slip into the night when the attack began. And they did, just as planned. That is why, even though 2 C-130U gunships, which were built SPECIFICALLY for this kind of attack, and which could have saved the lives of our people there and were a mere 45 minutes away, were never scrambled at any time during the attack.

There was to be no resistance whatsoever. That is why there were not one, but TWO armed drones flying over the consulate during the conflagration... our CIA operatives on the ground were painting targets because they knew air cover was available. That is why, even though requesting support and backup three times, their requests were NOT ignored, but were intentionally, specifically DENIED three times, and they were told to "stand down," which basically means to "surrender." That was part of Obama's plan.

They were not to fight back. That would potentially undermine the kidnapping effort and cause unnecessary "complications." That is why, even though the CIA operatives and ex-Navy Seals were on the ground, providing real-time reports, and even though they were "lighting up" the source of the mortars attacking the compound with lasers, no gunships or support ever came. They weren't supposed to resist. That wasn't "part of the plan." It also wasn't part of the plan for one of the CIA operatives to intentionally defy Obama's orders, and who rescued the body of Sean Smith and then stood up again orders, and engaged the enemy who was attacking American soil. It was supposed to be "clean." Quick. Efficient.



Kidnap the Ambassador and get out. Then Save The Day in the "nick of time." They didn't factor in a tiny group of highly trained ex-Navy Seals/CIA operatives... American Patriots and heroes. Even though they eventually lost their lives in the firefight, they managed to employ the full measure of their skills, and took out over 80 attackers in the process... which enraged the attackers, who were led to believe that they would encounter no resistance.

THAT is why Ambassador Stevens was raped (sodomized), murdered, and dragged through the streets. In their warped minds, they believed that they had been betrayed by the U.S. yet again. They believed that Obama was their friend. They believed that they were going to get their beloved Blind Sheik back. And yet, here were 80 of their own... dead by American hands.

Obama was asked directly in an interview if he denied their request for assistance, he refused to answer, and instead droned on with a canned response promising to "bring those responsible to justice." Former CIA and State Dept. personnel are coming out now with damning evidence that indicts President Obama, and reveals the truth about what is going on. Hillary Clinton, who is now openly laying the blame at the feet of the President, after falling on her sword in a premature show of loyalty for the Administration.



The "Video" defense was carefully crafted WEEKS in advance, to explain the attack. If this doesn't outrage you, If you are not moved enough to contact your congressman about this, you are not worthy of your citizenship.

 

[dannno]

Republicans were up in arms over Benghazi, do you think it helped his re-election?

One way or another I'm sure this whole thing was a setup, just not entirely sure if that covers all of the motives.

 

[UWDude]

This information was passed on to me tonight. I cannot confirm the source. In liberty, I believe I must pass it on...

laughable non-sense. Obama is not a mooslim. He is a banker puppet.

I do know the entire "innocence of Muslims" rioting was a set-up, but not sure what exactly the reason was.

 

[LJC4Liberty]

Republicans were up in arms over Benghazi, do you think it helped his re-election?

One way or another I'm sure this whole thing was a setup, just not entirely sure if that covers all of the motives.

Republicans were up in arms about how "it turned out", but according to this - it did not go as planned. The plan was for Obama to come out
smelling like a rose.

Believe me, I don't want to think any of this is true, especially for the families of our four citizens. But it just wouldn't suprise me...

 

[UWDude]

Believe me, I don't want to think any of this is true, especially for the families of our four citizens. But it just wouldn't suprise me...

I don't believe you.

 

[paulbot24]

This is interesting and I'm sure there is some truth to it. It makes more sense than the narrative we've been told. Most of the public is still under the belief that "we don't negotiate with terrorists...." It makes most around here sigh and laugh but still, many of the public would believe we had somehow set a new ugly precedent in "dealing" with them. Very interesting though. Will you know more or be able to offer more sources later?

 

[dannno]

I think what I'm getting at is same story, different angle.

Ya, 'Obama' has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, which are about as strong as the Bush admins ties to Al Qaeda. They collude together through our intelligence agencies who have operatives in both organizations. It has little to do with Obama's 'shady' past and this incident has nothing to do with Obama's personal agenda.

I think it happened for broader strategic purposes for our military operations. I think that it was probably setup to help Obama since his admin had to be in collusion at some level. Obama admin did their job, so he was made to look good and got re-elected.

 

[LJC4Liberty]

This is interesting and I'm sure there is some truth to it. It makes more sense than the narrative we've been told. Most of the public is still under the belief that "we don't negotiate with terrorists...." It makes most around here sigh and laugh but still, many of the public would believe we had somehow set a new ugly precedent in "dealing" with them. Very interesting though. Will you know more or be able to offer more sources later?

Came to me in an email claiming Military and Homeland security sources with this message:

I received this message today. IF this proves to be true, it is impeachable grounds. It also may help explain why Petreaus was forced out a few days before the Benghazi hearings coming up. It explains a lot of behavior by Obama and his administration - the pulled security, the "stand down" orders, and blaming that stupid video. The fireworks are coming. It will be the first of many disasters ahead. Please share with your email list.

I just believe that this gives more credibility to Dr. Paul's ideals that we need conduct ourselves honorably, stay the hell out of other countries business and take care of our own!

 

[Dick Chaney]

AL'CIADA

 

[squarepusher]

Obama had a sure lead regardless of this event. He didn't need to do it and I doubt there is any truth to this idea.

 

[Carson]

I've thought about the story in this thread since yesterday. Even though I've been able to pretty much shine on the hype surrounding this deal and haven't studied on the story at all, this, as far out as it may sound, has the ring of truth about it. None of the other stories have. Most just sound like misdirection.



Then again, this sort of ending to any email type chain story really sucks the life out of it;

"If this doesn't outrage you, If you are not moved enough to contact your congressman about this, you are not worthy of your citizenship."


But still...

 

[SilentBull]

Glenn Beck said Obama could get impeached and go to prison over this. One can only hope. They're obviously covering something up.

 

[COpatriot]

Glenn Beck said Obama could get impeached and go to prison over this. One can only hope. They're obviously covering something up.

Most of what Glenn Beck says is not true.

 

[thoughtomator]

Most of what Glenn Beck says is not true.

Agreed. Don't listen to Glenn Beck, he is a disinformation specialist targeted at those who can see past the lead propagandists on that network.

 

[SilentBull]

Agreed. Don't listen to Glenn Beck, he is a disinformation specialist targeted at those who can see past the lead propagandists on that network.

I am well aware of what Glenn Beck is.