What is taking so long????

[pinkmandy]

Still 86% reporting. Why such a wait? I keep refreshing and nothing...are they big precincts? Anyone know?

 

[patawa91]

i'm wondering the same thing

 

[patawa91]

i don't think anyone knows

 

[Paul10]

....

 

[bulloncoins]

So many more democrats voting.....And then they have to re-evaluate for less than 15%.

Far fewer republicans cast a simple vote. One peson one vote. Period. And yet we are still at only 86% reporting to deomacrats 99%.

Something stinks big time.

 

[thehighwaymanq]

We've been waitin on 85/86% for like 35 minutes.

RP is at 10,040.

 

[slinkymaster]

same reason why ohio took so long in 2004

 

[Ronin]

It's Iowa. They don't have phones in all the counties!! (no offense Iowans)

 

[Richandler]

Yah it's ridiculous. The vote is a fraud simply because it took longer than 5 minutes to send in results.

 

[Abyss]

The truth is that those countys are not larger then normal.

Therefore something out of the ordinary is happening.

What is it? I don't know.

 

[S3eker]

Therefore something out of the ordinary is happening

I think it's either:

A. The Reptillian's are interfering with the votes

B. That entire district was abducted

C. Something to do with crop circles

D. District 7 was imploded

E. Something to do with the chupacabras

F. Someone found an image of Jesus on a voting card

 

[yongrel]

I think it's either:

A. The Reptillian's are interfering with the votes

B. That entire district was abducted

C. Something to do with crop circles

D. District 7 was imploded

E. Something to do with the chupacabras

F. Someone found an image of Jesus on a voting card

All of the above

 

[Abyss]

All of the above

No.

It was the terrorists. Iran in fact...

We need to nuke them.

 

[FreedomProsperityPeace]

I'm getting tired of waiting.

 

[rezster]

Something is going on...has the MSM reported on the delay?

 

[alaric]

Still 86% reporting. Why such a wait? I keep refreshing and nothing...are they big precincts? Anyone know?

they have to wait to figure out who to throw these extra ballots to.

 

[ChelC]

Well if they can say the top 3 are the serious candidates, then they really don't want Paul to be #3. As close as the numbers are on CNN where I looked, I wonder if that's part of the fuss.

 

[alaric]

Well if they can say the top 3 are the serious candidates, then they really don't want Paul to be #3. As close as the numbers are on CNN where I looked, I wonder if that's part of the fuss.

exactly. 3-4-5 is so close they can 'play' with the numbers in relative safety, thereby using it to 'justify' fixnews' exclusion of Ron Paul from their precious 'forum'. all-in-all, that very close 5th 'official' result will stick in their craw. they have to accept he is a truly viable candidate. its dirty, but we are steadily gaining ground!