What is Ron Paul's plan re: Taiwan?

China does favor internal stability over expansionism, but it will get to the point, with the size of its population and economy, that it needs the world's resources to feed its consumer engine, and will see foreign powers as threats and obstacles to its continued growth. There really is no difference between China now and imperial Japan before, except China is 10X bigger. Japan too was not historically an expansionist nation, but when it needed foreign resources, it went abroad and took them.
 
Last edited:
I have been searching for a while to find Ron Paul's view on the first Gulf War because I was curious and it would give some insight on what he might do if Taiwan was invaded. I found my answer in a John Stossel interview and it is a bit disturbing. Apparently he felt the Iraq invading Kuwait was just a border dispute and none of our business.

So what would he do in the case of Taiwan? Probably nothing. If the Taiwanese people were begging for our help to free them from their oppressors I guess they'd be SOL. Makes me wonder what he would have done with Iraq. Keep on buying oil from them never mind they are raping a neighboring country that happens to be an ally? I wish I had a half hour to sit down and talk foreign policy with Ron Paul. His FP seems so cold hearted and dangerously weak sometimes. I just wonder why Ronald Reagan saw RP as such a great congressman considering his foreign policy agenda and why Ron Paul was such a fan of Reagan. I must be missing something.
 
Kuwait belongs to Iraqis. Ethnically "Kuwaitis" and "Iraqis" are the same, the only reason Kuwait is its own nation is because oil is highly concentrated under its sand.
 
Last edited:
"it will get to the point, with the size of its population and economy"

Hard to do that when you enforce one child per family. They are going to have demographic implosion shortly.
 
I have been searching for a while to find Ron Paul's view on the first Gulf War because I was curious and it would give some insight on what he might do if Taiwan was invaded. I found my answer in a John Stossel interview and it is a bit disturbing. Apparently he felt the Iraq invading Kuwait was just a border dispute and none of our business.

So what would he do in the case of Taiwan? Probably nothing. If the Taiwanese people were begging for our help to free them from their oppressors I guess they'd be SOL. Makes me wonder what he would have done with Iraq. Keep on buying oil from them never mind they are raping a neighboring country that happens to be an ally? I wish I had a half hour to sit down and talk foreign policy with Ron Paul. His FP seems so cold hearted and dangerously weak sometimes. I just wonder why Ronald Reagan saw RP as such a great congressman considering his foreign policy agenda and why Ron Paul was such a fan of Reagan. I must be missing something.
Would RP be controlling where oil is bought from? I have the opposite reaction from you. I keep wondering what RP ever saw in Reagan.
 
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for a non-interventionist foreign policy, but I just can't take it to the suicidal extreme. What if Russia decides to invade Canada? None of our damn business? Wait till they mass troops on the border and hope they don't invade us? What if North Korea launches a nuclear strike on Japan? No biggie, not our business? Should we have pulled our troops out of Western Europe during the Cold War and hoped the Soviets wouldn't take the whole place over?

The US having troops all over the world is not causing all the worlds problems. There will be many problems if we bring them all home. How out of control do we let things get before we do something. You let totalitarianism expand all over the world and by the time it is a direct threat it is to late to stop it.

That doesn't mean we should get all Neo-Con on the world but it does mean we aught to keep an eye on it and respond to the most dangerous and egregious acts of aggression.
 
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for a non-interventionist foreign policy, but I just can't take it to the suicidal extreme. What if Russia decides to invade Canada? None of our damn business? Wait till they mass troops on the border and hope they don't invade us? What if North Korea launches a nuclear strike on Japan? No biggie, not our business? Should we have pulled our troops out of Western Europe during the Cold War and hoped the Soviets wouldn't take the whole place over?

The US having troops all over the world is not causing all the worlds problems. There will be many problems if we bring them all home. How out of control do we let things get before we do something. You let totalitarianism expand all over the world and by the time it is a direct threat it is to late to stop it.

That doesn't mean we should get all Neo-Con on the world but it does mean we aught to keep an eye on it and respond to the most dangerous and egregious acts of aggression.
It sounds like you support a moderate interventionist foreign policy, not non-intervention. Have you read A Foreign Policy of Freedom?
 
It sounds like you support a moderate interventionist foreign policy, not non-intervention. Have you read A Foreign Policy of Freedom?


I think you are probably correct. No, I haven't read it. I'll pick up a copy this weekend.
 
If someone invaded Canada that would be a national security threat. I don't even think Ron Paul would sit by for that one. Plus, the Congress would do something like DECLARE WAR!!!!! We weren't meant to be an empire! We were meant to be a republic protecting liberty here at home! What if North Korea threatened a nuclear attack on Japan? Would Ron Paul talk tough with them or would the Japanese start developing nuclear weapons to defend itself without the U.S. protecting them?
 
I agree with Ron Paul with some social and economic issues, but his Taiwan policies. As a Taiwanese American, I feel that Ron Paul's foreign policy like and ostrich who stick is end in the ground thinking that he's safe. Ron Paul's foreign policy seems like one of appeasement, and we see from World War 2 that appeasement doesn't work.
Ron Paul says withdraw from Europe and the Middle East, I agree with that. Mainly because we really are being attacked for being there. But Asia is another story, there are a lot of American interests at stake if some sort of disturbance broke out in Asia. Want proof? look at where are your electronics are made. I guarantee that the majority of them are made in China, Taiwan, and Japan. So our economy has a lot at stake. Cong. Paul says we need to talk to other nations, well China is not interested in compromising, well I've seen little evidence, for them it's either "one China, two systems" or war. That's kinda simplified but that's the gist of it. Imagine you're a little third grader (Taiwan) and a big ninth grader (China) starts to bully you, stealing your lunch, your homework, all of this in plain sight as it usually happens. Of course you would expect people quiet possible help you, but Ron Paul seems like the kind of guy who would sit back and watch.
I remember Cong. Paul saying something about 'how would we like it if foreign soldiers to be marching down in our streets" or something along those lines. I have to ask, what if you were that little kid and you were being picked on. Of course there'll be debate about this, but keep that in mind.

I honestly believe that it is the job of all people and all human beings to provide whatever aid they can to help another person. Obviously, only America attempts to help, and the UN nearly fails at it's job. Dr. Paul says lead by example, we're trying to lead but no one's watching.

There's more I have to say, but it's freezing outside and inside. And I have other stuff I need to do. But I hope this make sense and that's my two cents.
 
China can collapse our economy (and therefore our ability to wage war) at any point it wants to by selling its dollar holdings.

There are down sides to being the world's largest debtor nation.
 
China can collapse our economy (and therefore our ability to wage war) at any point it wants to by selling its dollar holdings.

There are down sides to being the world's largest debtor nation.

China can collapse just about everyone's economy. not just the US.
 
thankfully, China is a nation dependent on export to wealthier countries. Sure they could sink a large portion of the global market, but they'd sink with it.
 
That is sort of like saying that the peasants depended on the feudal lords to consume their products or they'd be poor.
 
Back
Top