Treathurst
Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2012
- Messages
- 19
You should come by more often! It's nice to see another member of my generation represented!!

You should come by more often! It's nice to see another member of my generation represented!!
I don't see how Romney positions/actions has any affect on what Paul would do/say. This is why it is unlikely that he would be given the slot, but if they did I would expect some future fireworks.
Romney will not pick Ron Paul as his VP, that would be a disaster (plus I'm not convinced Paul would want the position). Can you imagine the VP debates where Paul would be contradicting most of Romney's positions? That wouldn't look very good. If Romney becomes the nominee he will avoid risks and pick someone safe that could possibly help him win a swing state.
RP better not do anything stupid, as you all say the writing is on the wall... If they decide to negotiate with Romney I'm afraid that's it for me.
No matter what happens it wasn't wasted. You know you're not alone, and thats something you didnt have before 2007.
"VP, a speech, influence of party platform, cabinet positions"
Let's say we get all of the above, do you consider that a win?
We have all the cards. The RNC cannot win without us. We can pull the trigger and tear the Convention in half. They have almost nothing we want other than the nomination. We can provide a landslide vs Obama.
But its a lot of very difficult steps to any sort of compromise.
why is everyone mentioning Ron as VP. if there is a deal isn't it mostly-likely Rand as VP?
If Romney knows this, then he's going to make a bid for our support. The only way he can accomplish this, is to offer Rand a VP spot. Even though it's questionable as to how many will fall for it.
But, considering the things that have come out of the campaign, like the constant begging for respect at the conventions towards the Romney people. And the fact that a VP spot for Rand is the only way to keep someone in the limelight. Because after this election is over, Ron Paul will vanish, retire, and rejoice. And I can't blame him on bit. 30 years of fighting battles that we can't imagine. Some of us have been in this fight for 4 or 5 years. I can't imagine 30 years.
So handing the torch to Rand, only seems like the right thing to do for Ron Paul and Mitt Romney.
Not if the only reason is to win. Ron carries the independent vote, no candidate on either side even come close. Rand would make the GOP happier, but you dont need them as much in the general.
I would be extremely let down if RP took a vp nomination. I don't like Rand so I don't care if he were chosen by Romney (assuming he gets the nomination) because Romney will lose and people can blame Rand for Romney's loss to Obama. Even though its pretty obvious Romney won't win anyway.Well I think this thread has revealed one thing besides speculation: we are split into those who would never vote for Romney even if RP was VP and those who would. So where does that leave us? Speculatively speaking of course.