What do you guys think of my political platform?

At the end of the day, drugs aren't a big issue. It's not the end of the world for me if they are legal. We need to nationalize our economy, restore our culture, close our boarders, and bring the troops home!
 
From Exodus 30:23 the word:
וּקְנֵה־בֹ֖שֶׂם

"qanehbusem" usually mistranslated "sweet cane" or "calamus"
 
At the end of the day, drugs aren't a big issue. It's not the end of the world for me if they are legal. We need to nationalize our economy, restore our culture, close our boarders, and bring the troops home!

One thing to always keep in the back of your mind. The more you want government to do, the bigger it becomes and the more it will infringe on liberty. That means you may have to put up with someone living their life differently than you prefer, but if you want liberty for yourself, you must defend the right of someone else exercising their own.

The primary role of the federal government was to be to defend liberty. To ensure that the force of the majority wouldn't infringe on the liberty of the minority, or the one. Most government was to be close to us; state and local. So that we could watch it closely and throw the bums out easily. So if you want a statute against something, it should be at the local level. Then, if someone doesn't want to live under it, they can try to change it, or move somewhere else that doesn't have that statute.
 
Last edited:
From Exodus 30:23 the word:
וּקְנֵה־בֹ֖שֶׂם

"qanehbusem" usually mistranslated "sweet cane" or "calamus"

Bear in mind that Abraham Lincoln called cannabis "sweet hemp" so there is precedent for the descriptor 'sweet.'
 
Just curious, what's your proof that cannabis is less harmful than alcohol?

Alcohol is toxic to your body - it damages your liver over time if consumed in larger quantities. Particular alcoholic beverages like wine and wood distilled spirits have some health benefits, and in moderation I think alcohol may even be healthy in general .... but ... it is toxic and will do damage to your body in the amounts that is commonly consumed, people do overdose and in some cases die from alcohol poisoning.

Cannabis, on the other hand, is non-toxic. It is pretty much impossible to overdose and it doesn't do damage to your body or organs. It also contains countless medicinal benefits in the form of CBDs which help your body regulate various functions. Your metabolism and countless other functions your body engages in from pain to the nervous system are all better regulated on cannabis because it contains the mechanism by which these functions communicate (CBDs).


I think, right or wrong, most Christians have a mentality that cannabis is INHERENTLY intoxicating while alcohol isn't.

As someone who drinks on occasion and uses cannabis pretty regularly, I have no idea what you are talking about. I get buzzed after a half a beer or a few sips of wine. I can get equally buzzed from cannabis by taking a small drag from a joint or a micro hit from a bong.

The big difference is after you consume more - with alcohol it causes people to black-out and they can become violent, angry, really happy, excited, bold or any number of exaggerated emotional states. They do things that they won't remember the next day. When you wake up, you can have a severe head-ache, body pain and feel incredibly nauseous and tired all day (hangover)

With cannabis, on the other hand, if you consume 'too much' you become tired and lay down on the couch and fall asleep. When you wake up, you feel refreshed.

People are more inclined to beat their children or family members, get in fights, have promiscuous sex and engage in criminal behavior after drinking. People are LESS inclined to do those things after smoking herb. I'm not saying it never happens, gangsters tend to toke herb, drink 40s and engage in criminal behavior but the cannabis is not exaggerating that behavior - if anything it helps them chill out and be more safe than they otherwise would be.

Also, cannabis can be consumed without heating or activating the THC component and you can consume the medicinal portion of the plant without any of the psychoactive effects.



I would say that the Bible is clear that alcohol is lawful (contra prohibitionists who ignore scripture) but I don't think it mentions cannabis at all per say, though IF its an inherently intoxicating substance that would be enough reason to say its sinful (though not criminal.)

That is debatable - you may disagree, but some people claim that canneh bosm (edit: Gunny mentioned this above) which Jesus used in his annointing oils in the Bible is cannabis. It makes sense because it would explain his healing miracles. If you made a cannabis oil and rubbed it on someone's eyes and they had glaucoma, they would find immediate relief from their symptoms. If you rubbed it on someone with some type of nerve damage like Multiple Sclerosis, they would find relief and may even be able to walk. Cannabis has been used as a treatment for leprosy. It has hundreds of medicinal uses.
 
Last edited:
Here's my concern. Let's say you legalize it all. How do we know a pilot hasn't smoked pot before flying an airplane? The only way we'd be able to know is a drug test. They would have to be tested before every flight. That's one example. It just opens the door to more government intervention. The other thing is our culture. I don't want pot smoking to become acceptable.

Are pilots presently drug tested before every flight? (I'll save you time: no.) How do you know he hasn't smoked pot before flying, as it is? How does making it legal or illegal affect your ability to know either way? Would you prefer a pilot be on heavier-but-legal drugs that aren't tested for?

Don't bother answering. I can tell already that you are completely clueless when it comes to drugs.

Here's a handy guide to how heavy drugs actually are, from a scale from 1 (slightly intoxicating) to 10 (complete loss of conscious control):

1: Nicotine
2: Caffeine, Sugar, Pot
.
.
4. Opium, cocaine
.
6. Ecstasy, LSD
.
8: Alcohol
9: Crack, heroin (plus many legal, widely prescribed drugs)
10: PCP, meth, bath salts

That's a realistic ranking of drug strength when divorced from your Nixon Youth training. Why should a drug at the hard end of the spectrum be legal when much softer ones aren't, and ones that are no harder are also illegal? Really, any sensible classification of alcohol would group it with the heavier drugs and not the softer ones, and a genuine safety concern would lead a person to put it high on the list of things to ban rather than making a quixotic exception for one of the most dangerous drugs of them all.

I have personal experience with all of these from alcohol and below and there is zero doubt in my mind that alcohol is BY FAR the most dangerous drug I have ever done. It's not even a close contest. No other drug has ever made me think I was going to die from consuming it, or made me vomit, or given me a hangover, or anything of the sort. Worst side effects any of the others have had are coughing (cigarettes) and headaches (caffeine).
 
Last edited:
https://mises.org/library/ricardian-law-comparative-advantage
My welcoming gift to you.

Platform
Marriage- Between one man and one woman
Abortion- Totally illegal l(a life is a life no matter what. If a woman is raped and gets pregnant, kill the rapist and let the child live)
Death Penalty- Legal in all states (make rape and pedophilia punishable by death)
Animal Rights- Secerely punish animal abuse. Animal abuse should result in a mental evaluation of the abuser, harsh prison sentence, and possible death sentence.
Drug use- Totally illegal for recreational purposes. Legal but strictly regulated for medicinal purposes.
Gun Control- Very little (keep guns away from the mentally ill and violent felons)
Foreign Policy- Non-interventionism (NO MORE unneeded foreign entanglements. Only consider war if there is an IMMEDIATE threat to the US. Let the Middle East deal with itself. Palestinian state is needed for Israel to remain Jewish. Gradually end ALL foreign aid. Get us OUT of the UN immediately. )
Immigration- Deport all illegal aliens (we owe them nothing) Stop all legal immigration until the unemployment rate is 2% or less.
Taxes- Teriff based revenue system supplemented by excise taxes. (drastically cut taxes on businesses) Taxes should go to basics like plice, firefighters, and defense. Abolish Estate tax, Death tax, and Payroll tax.
Economy- Free-market capitalism. Protectionist trade policy.(Strongly oppose free trade. Put high tariffs on all imported goods) Focus on American industry and manufacturing. Go back to Gold Standard.
Welfare- End ALL forms of welfare(food stamps, poor housing, Medicaid, etc) The governments job is government, not charity.
Healthcare- Slightly regulated free-market healthcare system.
Federal Bureaucracy- Abolish IRS, Department of Education, EPA, HUD, and Department of Commerce,
Education- End public education. Support private schools, charter schools, and homeschooling. Stop ALL federal funding for universities. Let the colleges fund themselves (like Hillsdale) College is only for ACADEMICS (not for partying and drinking) Most kids do not belong in college. Create separatespecialized “colleges’ for athletes.
Agriculture- End the service economy. Make agriculture a cornerstone of the nation.
Environmentalism- “climate change” is a fraud. Continue looking for alternative energy sources, but don’t put coal and oil companies out of business.
Morality/Values- Stand for traditional morality and values. Create strong sense of American nationalism. Strongly oppose multiculturalism and affirmative action. Make English official language of America. Ban ALL pornography. Anyone who creates or distributes porn of any kind should be punished with 50 years in prison. Put homosexuality back on the list of mental illnesses, No more government funding of “transgender” programs of any kind. Stop glorifying perverts. America should be a nation with Christian values. We must not lose our Western heritage. Our culture is superior because our religion is true. Abandoning Christianity will ultimately destroy our culture.
Other- Repeal the 16th and 17th Amendments. Pass a Balanced Budget Amendment. Strict term limits for ALL politicians.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
What did you have in mind?

The constitution of any nation should recognize Christ as king and thus refuse to tolerate false religions. Though I also believe the US would need to be substnatially more decentralized as well. (ie. multiple nations.)
 
The constitution of any nation should recognize Christ as king and thus refuse to tolerate false religions. Though I also believe the US would need to be substnatially more decentralized as well. (ie. multiple nations.)
The US should become an absolute monarchy, with Christ as King and no other government structure.
 
The constitution of any nation should recognize Christ as king and thus refuse to tolerate false religions. Though I also believe the US would need to be substnatially more decentralized as well. (ie. multiple nations.)

Never mind that doing so would grossly violate Christ's own teachings, including the utterly fundamental "do unto others as you would have them do unto you".

Liberty for me, not for thee, that is not liberty, that is tyranny.
 
Never mind that doing so would grossly violate Christ's own teachings, including the utterly fundamental "do unto others as you would have them do unto you".

Liberty for me, not for thee, that is not liberty, that is tyranny.

No it doesn't. See Matthew 5:17-18, 1 Timothy 1, and the Old Testament.
 
No it doesn't. See Matthew 5:17-18, 1 Timothy 1, and the Old Testament.

The first two have nothing to do with your assertion and the latter does not substantiate it in any way.

I think you need a new username if you are going to promote ideas fundamentally opposed to the concept of human liberty.
 
The first two have nothing to do with your assertion and the latter does not substantiate it in any way.

I think you need a new username if you are going to promote ideas fundamentally opposed to the concept of human liberty.

Liberty is defined by scriptures. So no, I don't. If physical harm to other human beings should be punished by the magistrate, how much more the spread of ideas that damn souls?
 
That is debatable - you may disagree, but some people claim that canneh bosm (edit: Gunny mentioned this above) which Jesus used in his annointing oils in the Bible is cannabis. It makes sense because it would explain his healing miracles. If you made a cannabis oil and rubbed it on someone's eyes and they had glaucoma, they would find immediate relief from their symptoms. If you rubbed it on someone with some type of nerve damage like Multiple Sclerosis, they would find relief and may even be able to walk. Cannabis has been used as a treatment for leprosy. It has hundreds of medicinal uses.

I don't think you can make that argument discounting the actual supernatural miracles that Jesus performed. Certainly not if you want to reach an actual Christian. You can argue that the healing properties of Cannabis are why it was in the anointing oil which Yeshua used but it was His power that made the healing so effective.

Also, what he smeared in the blind man's eyes was not anointing oil, but mud.

When He had said this, He spat on the ground, and made clay of the spittle, and applied the clay to his eyes,7and said to him, "Go, wash in the pool of Siloam " (which is translated, Sent). So he went away and washed, and came back seeing.…

One thing I can tell you for absolute certain, if you try to argue that the reason these people were healed was because of the cannabis oil and not because of the power of God, you may as well not waste your breath talking to actual Christians. We know better, and will just dismiss the whole thing if you try to hang the healing on the oil and not on the power of God.
 
At the end of the day, drugs aren't a big issue. It's not the end of the world for me if they are legal. We need to nationalize our economy, restore our culture, close our boarders, and bring the troops home!

I think it is a pretty big deal for you if you proposed in all seriousness that people should be subject to enforcement for engaging in it.

Otherwise, the pretty big deal is that you are casually throwing around these things as perfectly fine for your government to do in your name.

The key thing to understand is that government action means unlimited violence up to and including lethal violence. By saying something should be illegal, you are calling for compliance under threat of death. There is no "agreeing to disagree" when it comes to government, and no limit to how far government will escalate violence in order to force compliance.

I would have you review your proposals and remove anything that lets the government kill people for refusing to comply that you aren't willing to see people killed for, before proceeding further. If you can casually throw out items from a proposal that previously you would have been content to see people killed over, then you haven't thought them through all that well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rad
This is possibly the single stupidest thing I have seen asserted on RPF since I put Zippy on ignore. You got some balls to attempt to redefine what liberty is in terms of your dogma and then impose it on others.

You've got some balls to redefine what liberty is in the light of your secular worldview.
 
Back
Top