What Do Women Want?

[M House]

Men have choices in relationships but I seldom hear them claim to be trapped or abused, etc., it happens but rarely. However, in the opposite end of the spectrum jeez.

 

[cheapseats]

Men have choices in relationships but I seldom hear them claim to be trapped or abused, etc., it happens but rarely. However, in the opposite end of the spectrum jeez.

I may have misunderstood. I thought you said it's not like women just "find themselves" accidentally in crappy relationships, and I was saying that the same is true of men.

In any case, violence against women in America is a national disgrace and on the increase.

There are ABSOLUTELY some women who are trapped in abusive relationships. Others stay because the price is right, of that there is no doubt. But take a gander at how many wives/girlfriends have been killed in the past couple years, rather than the guy having to deal with messy divorces/breakups/pregnancies.

Where is the outrage? There is none whatever. The Lacey Petersen's, like the Caylee Anthony's and the Natalie Holloway's, are looped through months and even years of "news" chiefly as distraction from white collar bullshit, not because we ever get serious about taking out our Made In America bullies. Take another gander at how many female college co-eds were snatched off the street and killed last year. People think they've ensconced their beautiful and promising daughter in a fine university and WHACK, gone.

 

[M House]

Um, it's always been a national disgrace and everywhere else. However, there's little point in them getting involved with such men is there. I've had one girlfriend and she broke up with me. She was not divorced, pregnant, in shambles, etc. The only reason such men are around is cuz women allow it. Such crap would've been bred out or atleast made socially passe long ago if women didn't themselves find it somewhat acceptable. No matter what anyone claims humans did not start out by raping each other. I see it biologically as nearly impossible.

 

[cheapseats]

Um, it's always been a national disgrace and everywhere else. However, there's little point in them getting involved with such men is there. I've had one girlfriend and she broke up with me. She was not divorced, pregnant, in shambles, etc. The only reason such men are around is cuz women allow it. Such crap would've been bred out or atleast made socially passe long ago if women didn't themselves find it somewhat acceptable. No matter what anyone claims humans did not start out by raping each other. I see it biologically as nearly impossible.

Your assumption is based on each person being able to physically, forcibly insist upon things happening as they would have them happen.

It would follow that the bailouts are occurring because we are allowing them, and that we have it within our power today to stop them. Where shall we report?

 

[M House]

As you can see a good number of the majority accept it, that's all it takes for it to survive.

 

[cheapseats]

As you can see a good number of the majority accept it, that's all it takes for it to survive.

Yep, the notorious Silent Majority.

That same Silent Majority does not arrive at the scene of domestic disturbance, take an abused woman under its wing and assure her of protection from the man who swears he will kill her if she leaves him.

 

[cheapseats]

As you can see a good number of the majority accept it, that's all it takes for it to survive.

I don't approve of the bailouts. I am prepared to die to alter the course of this nation's history. Do you think I could go today and put a stop to these ruinous bailouts? Or do you think someone has more power than me?

In a minute, I'll have come full circle to my new THIS WOULD BE A TERRIBLE TIME TO SURRENDER ARMS position.

 

[M House]

No idea, I wouldn't die over the bailouts just yet. Much like we're conditioned to believe this problem of shitty guys couldn't be resolved by women not breeding with them, people are conditioned to believe that their government works this way. As long as that ideology lasts, it would be futile. Power is theirs, but we over time have given them that. What matters most is getting the attention necessary for such a massive mindset change. If that doesn't happen, you'll be protecting your life not just your wallet.

 

[M House]

Anyway, people hate these forums for the lack of action but in so many ways it's incredibly important it exists. If we are shut down here, shit has truly gone beyond any hope for change.

 

[cheapseats]

No idea, I wouldn't die over the bailouts just yet.

By all means, let us not be rash. I said I'm prepared to die to alter the course of the nation's history. The bailouts are symptomatic of disease, they are not the disease.

Much like we're conditioned to believe this problem of shitty guys couldn't be resolved by women not breeding with them, people are conditioned to believe that their government works this way.

People are QUITE capable of turning into shitheads all on their own. I dare say that MOST shitheadery is not genetic, though a good deal of it is inherited.

Abused women have ALSO been conditioned. They ALSO live in fear. Someone has POWER over them. I stress that to distinguish VICTIMS from GOLD DIGGERS. Violence against women is a separate problem in America, distinct from the same-old-same-old corruption in Washington.

As long as that ideology lasts, it would be futile. Power is theirs, but we over time have given them that. What matters most is getting the attention necessary for such a massive mindset change. If that doesn't happen, you'll be protecting your life not just your wallet.

See, I think that ENOUGH people ARE awake. Those who are STILL unaware are not, in my opinion, liable to awaken in a time frame that is meaningful to altering the aforementioned course of history. Me, I think that the PRESENT is the moment to seize.

 

[M House]

It's not different exactly like you agreed with me; it's a pathological acceptance of shittyness. I'm not seeing a good idea other than either passive or violent resistance. You movie idea wasn't bad at all though, but I'm not sure how we could pull that off or get it enough attention. There's plenty of media out there for people to research on these long standing political issues. I'm personally waiting to see if there's another get together like the Ron Paul convention.

 

[M House]

Anyway if women stopped breeding with douchebags, I'd say conservatively the douchebag rate would drop 90 percent. Cuz this takes away two huge causes of douchebagginess: parents and genetics at the same time.

 

[cheapseats]

It's not different exactly like you agreed with me; it's a pathological acceptance of shittyness.

Perversely juxtaposed with delusions of Exceptionalism, I might add.

I'm not seeing a good idea other than either passive or violent resistant.

I sense there is something in between, where all the gray lies, that can amount to Effective Resistance.

You movie idea wasn't bad at all though, but I'm not sure how we could pull that off or get it enough attention.

The documentary angle, are you talking about?

I'm DOING it. I have closed up my storage. Now I have to close up the apartment that I just not quite finished settling into. I'm looking at RV's, without a CLUE what I'm looking at other than price and the kind of appointments that are least consequential to road reliability. It may actually turn out that living on the road, if I LEASE the RV, will not be substantially more expensive than renting in Los Angeles.

The documentary is at the end, though. It is a serial format that I envision from the road -- not Reality TV, but Reality.

I'm personally waiting to see if there's another get together like the Ron Paul convention.

I am hoping to persuade the Bearers of Arms not to "wait and see" about a big festival but, rather, to MAKE IT HAPPEN.

A Patriot Faire . . . if we build it, they will come.

 

[M House]

Have you tried Campaign for Liberty or whatever Ron's official group is? They have far more resources and contacts probably to help you out with than the forum crew. I mean we actually are only a small part of the big picture.

 

[cheapseats]

Have you tried Campaign for Liberty or whatever Ron's official group is? They have far more resources and contacts probably to help you out with than the forum crew. I mean we actually are only a small part of the big picture.

Gotta find the other half of My Pair, first. Never thought I'd have to say that, EVER, but conditions on the ground have changed. And I am changing by bowing to Reality.

THEN, I'll feel out Supporters of Personalities. In my view, there isn't ONE politician with whom we are familiar who is the right person to be in the vanguard of Comprehensive and Meaningful Reform, including Ron Paul. In my view, NO ONE who has been in Congress for 30 years has been gettin' the job done.

 

[M House]

O well....
Back to what women want?

About, some the genetics of this crap. The most important chromosome a male has is the X chromosome from his mommy. Basically it ensured his survival to be born. And thus likely some of the best genetic material, she could come up with. So men end up likely with the most complete X chromosome packages available. Likely the most important to a women's daughters will be his X as well. Of course, we men also have Y chromosomes to offer but they are extremely uniform in what little content they have. Process of stuffing together a suitable X for male children will have to be repeated still.

As you can see the extreme effect selective mating has in our species. I would recommend people respect this. Though, it's only a fraction of the entire human development process. Why is my daughter such a wild crazy bitch? Um what was dad like? or Why do I have sons with such tumultuous relationships? Well, how have your relationships turned out? Genetically, mating is strongly skewed in the effect the female parent has on the outcome. It's not fair, but it just is. Thus you can cringe every-time a woman walks into a sperm bank. That's doing some real hit or miss.

 

[gjvrieze]

...................

 

[gjvrieze]

...............

 

[M House]

Dude, I'm 25 and the only thing "romantic" about women is their word choice sometimes. Thus playing that word game, it's really up for them to define it. They do NOT seem to go for anything like the movies, but always claim to.

 

[cheapseats]

O well....
Back to what women want?

About, some the genetics of this crap. The most important chromosome a male has is the X chromosome from his mommy. Basically it ensured his survival to be born. And thus likely some of the best genetic material, she could come up with. So men end up likely with the most complete X chromosome packages available. Likely the most important to a women's daughters will be his X as well. Of course, we men also have Y chromosomes to offer but they are extremely uniform in what little content they have. Process of stuffing together a suitable X for male children will have to be repeated still.

With twice your life experience, I will posit that nurture has a lot more to do with relationship styles than has nature.

As you can see the extreme effect selective mating has in our species.

Indiscriminate mating isn't all it's cracked up to be, either.