What do the other Candidates even stand for?

[Flirtnwitdisaster]

While I was watching the candidates speech's last night, after the New Hampshire primary, I noticed that when Ron Paul was giving his speech, his supporters shout things like "end the fed", "end the wars" and "Ron Paul revolution, give us back our constitution". But when the others gave their speech's, like Mitt Romney, his supporters just yell "Mitt, Mitt, Mitt". The other candidates supporters just yell their candidates first name. So what does that tell you about what they stand for? Their just in it for themselves.

 

[Spikender]

Good point! The other candidates really do stand for nothing... well, except for big government, but I doubt his supporters would want to chant that.

"B-I-G, we want Big Government!"
"Give me a Capital G! It's the only way to please me!"
"Can't you freaking see? Government is good for me!"
"Flip Flop! Flip Flop! Flip Flop!"

 

[RickyJ]

That's all they are paid to yell, their first name. I have seen on real support for any candidate except Ron Paul and Herman Cain while he was in the race. The others have no real support to speak of, they are establishment media candidates only. Who is actually voting for these people?

 

[Flirtnwitdisaster]

Their just running on "name recognition".

 

[ByeByeBernanke]

Good point. It was funny listening to Mitten's speech last night, he literally said nothing. Absolutely nothing of substance which is ironic because he criticizes Obama for the same lofty rhetoric.

 

[Spikender]

Good point. It was funny listening to Mitten's speech last night, he literally said nothing. Absolutely nothing of substance which is ironic because he criticizes Obama for the same lofty rhetoric.

I thought the same thing, Mitt Romney literally is just the GOP's Obama. He uses the same fake charms, vague words, and petty shows of American patriotism that Obama does. He's duping Republican voters just like Obama duped Democrats. Just like Obama, Mitt's past SHOULD make him unelectable, perhaps even more so since Mitt's past clearly shows he's a huge progressive flip-flopper on just about every issue, but Republicans are so set on "Weez gots to beet Obama!" that they're willing to endure Obama's GOP equal.

 

[69360]

What do you want them to stand for? That's what they stand for.

 

[Flirtnwitdisaster]

With their hand held out.

 

[Spikender]

What do you want them to stand for? That's what they stand for.

I chuckled. Plus Rep.

 

[bluesc]

too late

 

[mport1]

They stand for controlling the lives of Americans in whatever way they see fit. This is usually whatever the special interests want.

 

[tbone717]

What do the other Candidates even stand for? Status quo with a Republican tinge. What's the difference between Bush, Clinton, Bush & Obama - the only real difference is to whom they direct their government handouts and regulations.

The only thing you've needed to know over these past 20+ years is where to move your money, depending upon who is in charge.

 

[rp2012win]

They stand for maintaining the establishment and forcing the sheep to obey their commands

 

[S.Shorland]

Hail to the chief when it's played for Ron Paul

 

[Duckman]

Hail to the chief when it's played for Ron Paul

Good answer!

But seriously, the only thing behind the candidacies of Newt, Perry, Santorum, or Romney is the EGO RUSH of being POTUS.

I always thought Herman Cain was just in the race to sell books and/or get a show on FOX News.

I do think John Huntsman believes he represents positive change for the Republican Party, but Ron Paul has much more change and much more support, and should step aside.

 

[libertyfanatic]

The status quo

 

[freneticentropy]

The Goldman Sachs