Ender
Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
- Messages
- 12,527
Can we have an "All of the Above" selection?
What did you think of the debate?
- Thread starter Bryan
- Start date
Can we have an "All of the Above" selection?
- Joined
- May 10, 2007
- Messages
- 8,781
You have to select them all manually. I know it's hard, but this is serious internet stuff.
Danke
Top Rated Influencer
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Messages
- 44,263
It is not how hard you vote, but how often that counts.
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 117,723
Not a poll.
No "Sweet Meteor of Death" option.
No "Sweet Meteor of Death" option.
- Joined
- May 10, 2007
- Messages
- 8,781
You'll have to settle with "How do I get out?" Deal with it. lol
tommyrp12
Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 1,467
(Other) It sucked and the two debating suck. Sh1t abyss.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=shit abyss
Damn filters.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=shit abyss
Damn filters.
fedupinmo
Member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2016
- Messages
- 2,354
More Booth!
Jesse James
Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2016
- Messages
- 1,019
as a neutral observer I say Trump won this round.. although talking good about Lincoln didn't help my opinion of him 
VOTE FOR DARRELL CASTLE!
VOTE FOR DARRELL CASTLE!
For serious Internet stuff!
I actually thought the debate was better than I expected. After video proof revealed that Trump is the moral cesspool that everyone except his most die-hard supporters knew all along, I expected most the debate to be framed around getting under his skin, just like the last one. Luckily for him, he seems to have finally realized that by going after Hillary, he's sheilding himself from that kind of personal scrutiny. Instead of trying to convince everyone he's a decent human being, he's going the path of making Hillary look much worse than him. This is probably the best strategy he could have played, and it was good.
Ultimately, I thought he did very well last night, unlike that first debate. Whereas Hillary came across as professional and diplomatic, in this debate she just looked stiff and robotic.
When it comes to actual substance, my stance is unchanged: both of these people are awful and neither is fit to be POTUS. I'm not just speaking about their personalities or poor records, but about their actual policies. Neither one of them was particularly strong one way or the other.
I actually thought the debate was better than I expected. After video proof revealed that Trump is the moral cesspool that everyone except his most die-hard supporters knew all along, I expected most the debate to be framed around getting under his skin, just like the last one. Luckily for him, he seems to have finally realized that by going after Hillary, he's sheilding himself from that kind of personal scrutiny. Instead of trying to convince everyone he's a decent human being, he's going the path of making Hillary look much worse than him. This is probably the best strategy he could have played, and it was good.
Ultimately, I thought he did very well last night, unlike that first debate. Whereas Hillary came across as professional and diplomatic, in this debate she just looked stiff and robotic.
When it comes to actual substance, my stance is unchanged: both of these people are awful and neither is fit to be POTUS. I'm not just speaking about their personalities or poor records, but about their actual policies. Neither one of them was particularly strong one way or the other.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,534
That threat of prosecution still rubs me the wrong way. It just feels like an bad precedent to set. Would have been more effective to press the issue that Hillary has been above the law, and go through a laundry list of her crimes. Also bring up people who have been punished for the same things, like Petraeus and the NSA employee who was recently arrested for taking work home.
Once on the subject of "above the law", a good candidate could also talk about uneven justice in a broader sense, and potentially appeal to a greater audience. Rand-style.
Zippyjuan
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2008
- Messages
- 49,008
Neither was able to swing any new voters in either direction. Trump was kinda creepy they way he was following around and frowning and leering behind Clinton while she was speaking. She lost points on the Lincoln thing. Trump avoided answering most of the real questions he was given. She was very calculated in her responses.
Similar threads
- Featured
