What did Ann Coulter say about RP at the PNAC convention?

bruno1969 said:
If I had a dime for everytime I head some neocon say that...
Click to expand...

Those people aren't neocons, they're conservatives who have been duped by Bush. In fact, many of them actively speak out against neoconservatism, while not realizing that they are subscribers to the number one item on their agenda.
 
nate895 said:
Those people aren't neocons, they're conservatives who have been duped by Bush. In fact, many of them actively speak out against neoconservatism, while not realizing that they are subscribers to the number one item on their agenda.
Click to expand...

I can agree with that.
 
I don't know what she said then.

I did see her on Glenn Beck a few nights ago. He tore into her because she has the belief the Republicans are the perfect party that always fight for justice(except John McCain). Anything else is grandstanding in her eyes.

So when Glenn suggested that the Republicans might not be sincere in their "revolt", she just couldn't contemplate that. Glenn got a wee bit frustrated.

Every time I try to read a book of hers, or watch an interview, I cringe...
 
I want a video clip of her saying she can't listen to Paul because he makes too much sense.
 
the title of Coulter's book is a pretty good title

that's about it! =o
 
i hear that all the time too. "We should take care of our country first...but Bush is just keeping us all safe right now"..

Stupid!
 
itshappening said:
but not on foreign policy...

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...


If she did say that, she's probably thinking RP wants to be an isolationist. Either that, or we'll (the U.S.) get caught with our pants down, so to speak, if we didn't have a presence around the world. Since the U.S. is spread all over the globe, we can be in any country very quickly, to offer aid, etc. I know what you're going to say, "and bomb too." That's true. I think what RP is talking about really has more to do with other countries picking up the slack which our country has been all too eager to grab, at our expense. A compromise solution, whereby our world presence is reduced but not eliminated, might be enough to get more Republicans on board.


FF
 
fr33domfightr said:
If she did say that, she's probably thinking RP wants to be an isolationist. Either that, or we'll (the U.S.) get caught with our pants down, so to speak, if we didn't have a presence around the world. Since the U.S. is spread all over the globe, we can be in any country very quickly, to offer aid, etc. I know what you're going to say, "and bomb too." That's true. I think what RP is talking about really has more to do with other countries picking up the slack which our country has been all too eager to grab, at our expense. A compromise solution, whereby our world presence is reduced but not eliminated, might be enough to get more Republicans on board.


FF
Click to expand...

What we must do is make conservatives realize that our policy is what they were arguing as little as ten years ago. The reason why conservatives didn't back Paul in droves wasn't foreign policy taken as a whole, but his presentation of it. He was forced into a situation in the May debate where he had to make his position sound as if he was blaming America for its problems. If he could have worked it properly he could have laid the blame on a Democratic administration and then related it to Bush's policy, essentially making Bush out to be a liberal. Instead he presented it as "we" if he would said something about how that is what Democrats did, he could have won out.
 
nate895 said:
What we must do is make conservatives realize that our policy is what they were arguing as little as ten years ago. The reason why conservatives didn't back Paul in droves wasn't foreign policy taken as a whole, but his presentation of it. He was forced into a situation in the May debate where he had to make his position sound as if he was blaming America for its problems. If he could have worked it properly he could have laid the blame on a Democratic administration and then related it to Bush's policy, essentially making Bush out to be a liberal. Instead he presented it as "we" if he would said something about how that is what Democrats did, he could have won out.
Click to expand...

Then I guess the problem with Ron Paul was that he didn't speak sneakily.
 
Somehow I've gotten the impression that while just about everything she says and writes is infantile, she is intelligent beneath the surface and is merely acting. I mean, much of the stuff is on a child's level, no adult should use heavily flawed arguments like she does. I know there are lots of conservative women who could express more intelligent views than she does, so the attention she's getting shouldn't be from a desperate search for a conservative woman.

Btw, did anyone notice the conservative band Right brothers has made a corny song about her called "I'm in love with Ann Coulter"?
 
Ann said (or I read in an article that she said) - "Ron Paul is very smart. He's the kind of guy that I don't want to listen to for too long because I'll start agreeing with him on everything. "

This was back during primary season.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Swordsmyth
Gabbard Launches Major Move Against The Deep State
2
Replies
21
Views
348
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
jmdrake
CNN’s Van Jones calls Black model’s speech at RNC ‘most dangerous’ for Democrats
Replies
0
Views
202
jmdrake
jmdrake
Snowball
Musk has to go. Be VERY concerned about what is REALLY happening.
2
Replies
25
Views
749
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
jmdrake
Kamala Harris gives AKA convention speech days after sorors got hundreds of gays evicted from
Replies
2
Views
439
Brian4Liberty
Brian4Liberty
osan
Dump The NAP And Greet The NTP
Replies
2
Views
395
osan
osan
Back
Top