brandon
SINO
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2007
- Messages
- 15,414
I never said I was in favor of seat-belt legislation and i'm not certain where in my post you find this. I said that there is a difference between seat-belt legislation and mandating automobile manufacturers to produce automobiles with certain safety precautions.
The argument is not really logical. It's like saying let drug companies make whatever they want without any oversight - and when 1,000,000 people die because drug x proved to be toxic years later - so be it. When there is a potential for human death there is no litigation that can revive that human being, so the freedom of corporations must be limited to ensure personal liberty.
What you fail to recognize is that mandating auto manufacturers to include seat belts in cars is "seat belt legislation".
We should not set a precedent of allowing the government to control how products are produced. It does not work and it limits liberty.
Cars would have seat belts in them even without the government mandating it. People would realize seat belts are a good idea, one car manufacturer would start including them because there is a market for it, and then almost every other manufacturer will follow suit to retain there market share. We dont need the government to do what the market can do. We need the government to do as little as possible.