Here's a fresh DIGG for RudysReadingList.com so get it to the frontpage!
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Ron_Paul_Donations_Rudys_Reading_List_Nov_30th
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Ron_Paul_Donations_Rudys_Reading_List_Nov_30th
A PROPOSAL FOR AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF PLEDGING $100 ON NOVEMBER 30
Instead of pledges to donate $100 on Nov.30th, How about getting pledges to donate $10 each and every day until Nov. 30 and / or Dec. 16th; or $10 each day until $100 has been contributed? (Separate checkoffs or radio buttons could be provided)?
This proposal has several virtues:
1) Keeps people involved and interested each day. Every day they will be watching the number of donations rise.
2) Builds interest factor, seeing the number of individual donations climb day by day
3) Establishes a new metric for a record (number of individual donations in a day) for media attention. As we reach record number of individual donations, the stage is set for media attention each day for yet another new record! The gift that keeps on giving!
4) Generates same amount of money by target end date for early pledgers, but campaign gets access to funds quicker.
5) As enthusiasm builds, pledgers will have reinforcement to increase their donation level or extend daily donations past the original target date they selected.
6) Allows separate focused attention on Nov.30 and Dec.16 as the consumate days for each contributor to make maximum feasible donation to achieve total funds raised records.
7) Allows media attention by the Nov.28 debates. Record numbers of donors correlate with high level of participation by Ron Paul supporters in video question submissions.
8) Avoids repeating the original problem: people hoarding dollars until the designated moneybomb day, starving campaign of reliable continuity of funds
The official campaign could facilitate the goal by providing at the donation site an option to authorize peridic contributions by credit card. This makes the actual donation automatic and easy for the contributor. Other campaigns have done this (albeit typically for monthly not daily contributions).
A promotional tagline like "STAND UP AND BE COUNTED" would, I think, key in well with this concept.
E. Nordstrom,
I respect what everybody has done to raise money for Ron, but I remember how disappointed I was at the end of September when only 2.5 million was raised and I remember how excited people got to give to him when November 5th took off. Even my liberal roommates (marijuana-legalizers) got caught up in the spirit and gave! We can't forget the remarkable ability of moneybombs to bring in new folks. They don't just shift the timing of donations, they create new donations. That's why I like the Nov. 30th idea. If we need more money quickly, then lets make it a moneybomb.
Can't wait to see what happens on the 16th.
E. Nordstrom,
I respect what everybody has done to raise money for Ron, but I remember how disappointed I was at the end of September when only 2.5 million was raised and I remember how excited people got to give to him when November 5th took off. Even my liberal roommates (marijuana-legalizers) got caught up in the spirit and gave! We can't forget the remarkable ability of moneybombs to bring in new folks. They don't just shift the timing of donations, they create new donations. That's why I like the Nov. 30th idea. If we need more money quickly, then lets make it a moneybomb.
Can't wait to see what happens on the 16th.
I am in for The Nov. 30th Money bomb $500 here. I WANT THE MEDIA TO SAY RUDYSREADINGLIST.COM hahahaha![]()
Individual fees have a higher total processing cost (cost per transaction), and create a lot more overhead for the campaign to manage (FEC reporting).
If possible, it's better to give in larger chunks. Small donations will get eaten up in fees and time to handle.