We Can’t Police These People

[pcosmar]

We Can’t Police These People

We Can’t Control These People

fify

 

[phill4paul]

It doesn't go directly from zero to stormfront. There are a lot of people in the middle before you get there.

I don't hate anyone. But I mean come on it's been 150 years since the end of slavery and 50 years since the end of the civil rights movement. Blacks have every oportunity to better themselves and their lives in the country. If they don't take it that is on them. I'm tired of hearing about all this crap.

Take away the cops from all their inner city neighborhoods. Let them kill and rob each other until they come to their senses.

THIS.

Pro-tip: Cops wouldn't be there if those that lived there weren't fucking degenerate criminals.

Cops don't cruise my area in the country. They don't do it because the people that live here act as law abiding citizens instead of predators.

Police your own fucking neighborhoods. Keep tabs on your fucking children. Quit being the 'victim' of a system long sense gone.

 

[phill4paul]

Fascists gonna fash.

They sure are. And they, for the most part, aren't law abiding whiteys.

 

[phill4paul]

As a side note, if you belong to some people group, and someone representing himself as one who speaks for another people group and who considers the interests of his group to be at odds with yours, said, "You can't police these people," about your group, wouldn't you consider that something to be proud of?

I wonder if the author of the article in the OP thinks that white people are easily subjugated (i.e. policed), and considers that a selling point for our race.

Perhaps it simply means that a rabid animal is just that. And cannot 'co-exist.' I belong to the group that is not anarchist. I believe in Natural right to life, liberty and property of individuals. But, you cannot have that without law and order. Laws which protect individuals. Order being the opposite of chaos.

 

[TheCount]

They sure are. And they, for the most part, aren't law abiding whiteys.

Most people aren't white so therefore most fascists aren't white.


Gregory Hood is probably white. His ilk are white. And they are universally fascists.

 

[Invisible Man]

Perhaps it simply means that a rabid animal is just that. And cannot 'co-exist.' I belong to the group that is not anarchist. I believe in Natural right to life, liberty and property of individuals. But, you cannot have that without law and order. Laws which protect individuals. Order being the opposite of chaos.

It sounds like you're saying that you belong to a group that you believe the rulers can look out over and say, "You can police these people," and you're happy with that.

So are the rulers.

There's a big difference between having law and order and policing people. But you and the author of the OP don't see the difference.

You don't have to be an anarchist to want not to be policed.

 

[phill4paul]

It sounds like you're saying that you belong to a group that you believe the rulers can look out over and say, "You can police these people," and you're happy with that.

So are the rulers.

There's a big difference between having law and order and policing people. But you and the author of the OP don't see the difference.

You don't have to be an anarchist to want not to be policed.

I don't get policed. There's no need. I don't kill, rob, or rape my neighbors. Policing generally happens south of the railroad tracks around here.

 

[BSWPaulsen]

I don't get policed. There's no need. I don't kill, rob, or rape my neighbors. Policing generally happens south of the railroad tracks around here.

The point you are making is entirely lost on some people.

Moral, culturally homogeneous populations hardly have any need for police. Immoral or culturally incompatible populations have a serious need of police.

 

[phill4paul]

The point you are making is entirely lost on some people.

People that need policing get policed because humanity is an autoregulating species with a contempt for chaos. Moral, culturally homogeneous populations hardly have any need for police. Immoral or culturally incompatible populations have a serious need of police.

Exactly.

 

[Anti Federalist]

The point you are making is entirely lost on some people.

Moral, culturally homogeneous populations hardly have any need for police. Immoral or culturally incompatible populations have a serious need of police.

Bingo.

The only way you can keep a lid on a multi ethnic, multi religious, multi political group of diversity is with a heavy handed police state.

People who are relatively the same on all those counts, tend to get along with each better and have no need for a heavy handed police system.

 

[Invisible Man]

The point you are making is entirely lost on some people.

Moral, culturally homogeneous populations hardly have any need for police. Immoral or culturally incompatible populations have a serious need of police.

Exactly.

Bingo.

The only way you can keep a lid on a multi ethnic, multi religious, multi political group of diversity is with a heavy handed police state.

People who are relatively the same on all those counts, tend to get along with each better and have no need for a heavy handed police system.

Which is it?

"We can't police these people."

or

"We must police these people."

It can't be both.

 

[Pauls' Revere]

Every other ethnicity has managed to build a productive community in America. Hispanics, Arabs, Koreans, Chinese, Vietnamese, they come to this country with nothing.

"China town" - Tourist destination. Stores are open 24/7. Great restaurants.
"Korea town" - Pretty much same as China town.
"Hispanic town" - a.k.a. San Antonio. They have done well enough for themselves.
"Vietnamese" - Restaurants everywhere
"Arabs" - Small business owners, restaurants

"Black town" - a.k.a "The hood", this is a place where you go if you want to get stabbed

New Orleans is a "chocolate city"- Remember this?

 

[merkelstan]

Which is it?

"We can't police these people."

or

"We must police these people."

It can't be both.

The word "can't" in this discussion is being used in the more colloquial sense "may not". This is because there exist powerful elements among us which increasingly run interference on the defense of property rights and security. Thus what you have is not a contradiction in normative statements, but the reflection of what may be an irreconcilable cultural or ethnic conflict within our geographic regions.

This is why ever more people are turning to seperation as the general solution. They see that this "must" and "can't" can be be resolved if the multi-culti globo-h0m0 project can be dismantled.

 

[DamianTV]

If good people were armed, maybe these unruly fucks would learn to leave others the fuck alone! Isnt that really what the 2nd Amendment is actually for?

Free men know freedom starts in the mind. Do not ask "permission" to have the ability to defend yourselves from these thugs.

 

[TheCount]

The point you are making is entirely lost on some people.

Moral, culturally homogeneous populations hardly have any need for police. Immoral or culturally incompatible populations have a serious need of police.

Bingo.

The only way you can keep a lid on a multi ethnic, multi religious, multi political group of diversity is with a heavy handed police state.

People who are relatively the same on all those counts, tend to get along with each better and have no need for a heavy handed police system.

Black people are killing black people in black communities...

because of diversity?



White men are being killed by white police officers in white communities...

because of diversity?

 

[Anti Federalist]

Which is it?

"We can't police these people."

or

"We must police these people."

It can't be both.

We cannot police these people within the norms established by the Bill of Rights.

As the empire continues to fracture and millions more wretched refuse pours in every year, the internal situation more and more resembles the Balkans, or Central America.

There is a reason Uncle Joe has increased militarized police transfers through the 1033 program from Trump's administration.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Black people are killing black people in black communities...

No, that's always happened.

Black people beating and mugging Asian people in "diverse" communities is increasing.

 

[Anti Federalist]

As a side note, if you belong to some people group, and someone representing himself as one who speaks for another people group and who considers the interests of his group to be at odds with yours, said, "You can't police these people," about your group, wouldn't you consider that something to be proud of?

I wonder if the author of the article in the OP thinks that white people are easily subjugated (i.e. policed), and considers that a selling point for our race.

I'll cede your point here, you are correct.

Most white people are polite and compliant to the point of maddening frustration, especially when faced with a mortal threat.

If we could have mustered half the anger of the black community at police brutality, we could be the ones winning on that front.

But we didn't and handed the issue to the Marxist left, who is winning and will continue to win because it is not troubled by notions of "fair play" and "The NAP".

Their rules are simple: "do what we say, or we will kill you and fuck your shit up".

Scared and compliant whites join that, instead of mustering the courage to fight it, especially when no one will defend their cause.

 

[TheCount]

Black people beating and mugging Asian people in "diverse" communities is increasing.

Is it?



(Also, this undermines your theory that all of the minorities are going to band together to kill all whites.)

 

[tod evans]

Is it?



(Also, this undermines your theory that all of the minorities are going to band together to kill all whites.)

Point that out since you've made the assertion.