Ron is last place in the PPP poll of MN. That's not going to translate to a win. I know people are hopeful and all but this is getting ridiculous. Some people are starting to behave like cult members.
There's a big difference when last place is only 10% behind first. We got 16% four years ago so I don't understand how we pull anything less than low-mid 20s.
I think the point was that 37% of the likely caucus goers are still undecided. Which means it could swing to a win if the right buttons are pushed.Ron is last place in the PPP poll of MN. That's not going to translate to a win. I know people are hopeful and all but this is getting ridiculous. Some people are starting to behave like cult members.
Just like he was going to win IA and win NV with 22,000 firm votes?
It's going to a be another 3rd or 4th.
Just like he was going to win IA and win NV with 22,000 firm votes?
It's going to a be another 3rd or 4th.
I think the point was that 37% of the likely caucus goers are still undecided. Which means it could swing to a win if the right buttons are pushed.
But again, the straw poll is not it, what is it is the delegate selection process.
Ron is last place in the PPP poll of MN. That's not going to translate to a win. I know people are hopeful and all but this is getting ridiculous. Some people are starting to behave like cult members.
You cannot be serious? LOL
Oh dear help us all, many RPF members still don't get it. We are losing because all we do is take into account the youth vote.
Yup, and you can work on older voters in other elections, not 1 day before the vote... it's all about GOTV
The 22,000 number was a heresay.
Paul WOULD have won Iowa had the media not run a 24-hour Santorum lovefest while pouring on the bogus newsletter fable.
Kids are the least reliable voting block. Historically when you rely on them, you lose.
As we are seeing now.
We CAN win Minnesota, or be so close that we are clearly near tied, in a close run.
Well, that blame can be placed 100% on the RP campaign for not being prepared. They had a full 2-weeks when it was obvious, to prepare for Santorum, and they had a full 20 years to prepare for the newsletters...
The handling (or not handling) of the newsletters issue, and the fact they attacked Santorum AFTER Iowa, shows incompetence on the campaign.
...and your solution is what, convert a whole bunch of stubborn old people en masse in a week's time?
You're right that kids are the least reliable voting block, but our other options aren't exactly low-hanging fruit either.
We need a win. We need a win. We need a win.
A close, damn near First, Second place finish is not winning.
The only thing that can change the face of this race in a WIN.
Paul's biggest problem is most definitely his campaign management, but this was a longshot for him to begin with. It's disappointing the campaign mismanaged it and has put us in this position but the demographics are promising for future liberty candidates. I think we need to rally behind some sort of third party (hopefully Ron) to show the GOP that if they don't change their message we don't vote for them.
The delegate stuff is getting silly. Romney will have a sizable lead before it goes to winner take all. Once it's winner take all Romney will lock down the nomination quickly. Gingrich and Santorum are going to fold and endorse Romney soon enough.
All this win the delegates nonsense is selling people a bill of goods.
So I guess we should quit and go home? Dude, you're not the only one who is disappointed. Watch the Paul supporters at the after hours caucus last night if you need a shot of courage and optimism. No offense but I find your defeatist attitude very disrespectful to all those folks who worked hard and voted for us in Iowa, NH, SC, Florida and yesterday in Nevada.
Nah, the campaign did a great job. They improved so much since last time. There just isn't enough support to win a GOP primary.
3rd party run is the way to go now. It would really shake things up. I don't think he could win, but maybe a viable 3rd party would emerge.