Washington Caucus Twitter Thread Here

there is really no way santorum and paul are that close in King county or that Romney is that far ahead. I mean seriously this isn't even funny in my view.. I thought we needed to keep it close here but this is beyond nonsense or we truly failed.
 
Anyone who thinks these numbers are legit, is blind to the depths of what these people will go.

They freaking slaughter tens of thousands of people with illegal wars, for money and power.

You're telling me they won't rig numbers while being counted in secret, to maintain that?
 
Personally, third party. Maybe Paul going third party could jump start a serious third party, with the degradation of the GOP. I would count that as a win, a viable third party.

I have been thinking about this a lot lately. He has incredible momentum right now, and I think after getting shafted by the GOP leaders time and time again, it would be appropriate to try to start a 3rd party. With all the momentum it could take off. He has polled at 18% against Romney and Obama as a 3rd party candidate. The Liberty Party has a nice ring to it.

Of course Ron would have to agree to do it, which I doubt he would. The other issue of hurting Rand's chances are to me, BS. The message and establishment of a real liberty party are more important than Rand.

I'm sure Peter Thiel, Peter Schiff, and some other wealthy folks would be happy to fund Super PACs for him.
 
Last edited:
there is really no way santorum and paul are that close in King county or that Romney is that far ahead. I mean seriously this isn't even funny in my view.. I thought we needed to keep it close here but this is beyond nonsense or we truly failed.
Pierce currently showing Romney... and a lower total turnout than in the 2008 Caucus... I'm trying to figure out how that makes sense (specifically the second part)
 
Yes, they will rig the beauty contest when they have the chance.
But we have the delegates which is what wins. Now they have to figure out how to fraud that.
 
The Libertarian party is the way to go. Already on all of the ballots. Ron polls high enough to get into the debates. It's time to forever bury the Republican party.
 
The Libertarian party is the way to go. Already on all of the ballots. Ron polls high enough to get into the debates. It's time to forever bury the Republican party.

The Libertarian Party is a joke. If he did go 3rd party (which I highly doubt he would), he needs to establish a new party.
 
The Libertarian Party is a joke. If he did go 3rd party (which I highly doubt he would), he needs to establish a new party.

If we are trying to take over one of the two largest and the most corrupt party, why couldn't we take over the Libertarian party?
 
I have been thinking about this a lot lately. He has incredible momentum right now, and I think after getting shafted by the GOP leaders time and time again, it would be appropriate to try to start a 3rd party. With all the momentum it could take off. He has polled at 18% against Romney and Obama as a 3rd party candidate. The Liberty Party has a nice ring to it.

Of course Ron would have to agree to do it, which I doubt he would. The other issue of hurting Rand's chances are to me, BS. The message and establishment of a real liberty party are more important than Rand.

I'm sure Peter Thiel, Peter Schiff, and some other wealthy folks would be happy to fund Super PACs for him.

Hmm. Thought just hit me--Ya think maybe the reason Hannity et al fawn all over Rand is just for the purpose of his dad NOT running third party? They'd probably throw him under the bus if Ron wasn't such a threat. This way, they can get us to worry about Rand's "future."
 
And if you took it over, what would you have?

A place for the liberty movement to grow while incentivizing Republicans to rethink their loyalty since they would never again win a national election.

What do you have when you try to take over a corrupt party from the people who are counting the votes?
 
Back
Top