Is that what you did? Sold all your gold at $1900? Incredible that you knew that would be the top price for the market. In 1999, I was looking at a guaranteed return on buying my home. Consider also that at that time, the price of gold had been falling nearly every year for 20 years. That did not look like a very good investment. Not many people want to invest in something which had such a dismal record.
Buying a home vs renting? When you rent, you are paying interest, property taxes, and required maintanance to- that is going to the person who owns the property owner and is included in your rent- you are paying those costs for them. You are not avoiding those costs. By using the same amount of money (my mortgage plus taxes are actually lower than renting a comparable unit in my area), instead of simply giving that money away to the property owner, I get a piece of that property for myself. Now when do I get my return? I have been saving all along vs the cost of renting and in addition when it is paid for (in just under one year more at the rate I have been pre-paying on the mortgage) my spendable income will jump by nearly 30%- and I get that return for as long as I continue to live here. Guaranteed. I can't get that guarantee from gold or other investments which will go up or down over time. And if I want I can still sell my home so I get a return plus still own the asset. To get the return on gold you have to actually sell it.
In reality, the choice was keep renting or buy a home. It was not buy a home or buy gold- you would still be spending that money either way on renting or home ownership. If you want to buy gold instead of renting, you can't because you still need a place to live. Unless you still live with Mom. That must be from money in addition to any rents or mortgage/interest/maintanance. It is not instead of. You can own a home and buy gold. It is not either or. I took money not going to rent and put it towards the home purchase. I still had to pay that money anyways- might as well get something for it. And by paying it off early (note that this will be in less than even 15 years) I am saving thousands in interest.
I am very happy with my decision.
So let us say I did not purchase a home when I did. I would still have been paying about $1000 a month or so on rent (Southern California beach area). I would not nearly have it paid off and I would not have had that "extra" money "saved" by not buying a home to put into gold. I would still be paying $1000 or more a month and not be facing a 30% increase in disposable income for 2013 and having an asset worth over $200,000. I do not see how I would be better off. But that is how it worked out for me.
If I decide to put more money into gold, can you promise me (and back it up with a guarantee) that gold will once again triple in price? Nobody can.
No, I sold at $1700. Did you invest in anything that appreciated that much in 12 years? If so, you're a pretty astute investor, considering the DOW is up only <20% in that span.
You haven't told us yet what your house has actually cost you to date vs what you think it's worth? BTW, how much is your house worth if no one wants to buy it?
I don't care if you or anyone else invests in silver (the subject of this thread). Did I give you the impression that I do? I just object to silly arguments against the idea by folks who just aren't thinking straight, have a typical American consumer mentality that dictates that buying built-in obsolescence and losing buckets of income in the process is AOK, but "FOOLS, Silver Is Gonna DROP!!!"
Here's my guarantee; I'll buy the silver instead of you. Good luck with your real estate portfolio out there in CA.

Bosso