warn others! very serious stuff Good bye rights

[Give me liberty]

http://digg.com/world_news/The_Anti_Counterfeiting_Trade_Agreement_ACTA_2

The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) is a proposed plurilateral trade agreement that would impose strict enforcement of intellectual property rights related to Internet activity and trade in information-based goods. The agreement is being secretly negotiated by the governments of the United States, the European Commission, Japan, Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Canada, and Mexico.[1][2] If adopted at the 34th G8 summit in July 2008, the treaty would establish an international coalition against copyright infringement, imposing a strong, top-down enforcement regime of copyright laws in developed nations. The proposed agreement would allow border officials to search laptops, MP3 players, and cellular phones for copyright-infringing content. It would also impose new cooperation requirements upon internet service providers (ISPs), including perfunctory disclosure of customer information, and restrict the use of online privacy tools. The proposal specifies a plan to encourage developing nations to accept the legal regime.


Some news of it
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7446280.stm
http://www.smartcompany.com.au/Free...g-cops-could-seize-your-iPod-or-computer.html
http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/story.html?id=ac94392c-7e05-4e30-af00-f237e9c23a9d

Are u worried now?
and also i am wondering maybe this what the Bilderberg group also talked about?
destorying people's rights?

 

[steve005]

restrict the use of online privacy tools.

thats crazy

 

[fr33domfightr]

FU!!!

It's called the 4th Amendment!!! Read it and obey it!!!

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

I will secure all my personal effects with whatever privacy mechanism of my choosing. It will be locked down so hard that any investigation by any branch of any government will never get access to my data for as long as they may exist!!!!!!!!!

This is called privacy, you F*cks!!!!

FF

 

[JohnDevilman]

This is so very frightening indeed.

 

[rathskeller]

Since when have we had any rights to distribute other people's works without permission?

Try going and standing outside Barnes and Noble and handing out free photocopoes of Ron Paul's book. See how long before Ron Paul gets pissed at you. Because he will. Ron Paul is NOT in favor of copyright infringement. No sane person would be. (Which is why it is such a popular topic on these boards.)

 

[MoneyWhereMyMouthIs2]

Since when have we had any rights to distribute other people's works without permission?

You must have posted this in the wrong thread. Nobody's talking about that topic.

 

[newyearsrevolution08]

people will continue taking it on their knees until it actually affects them.

 

[acptulsa]

FU!!!

It's called the 4th Amendment!!! Read it and obey it!!!

The customs area of a border crossing is different than a person's home, and the ISP provider isn't even in someone's home.

 

[constituent]

The customs area of a border crossing is different than a person's home, and the ISP provider isn't even in someone's home.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..."

Though i will agree that this is a limitation on government and not a protection from ISPs that people voluntarily choose to do business with.

The sticky part of the OP is requiring ISPs to do this or that.

 

[Uncle Emanuel Watkins]

If art is a masterpiece people want an original copy.

Since when have we had any rights to distribute other people's works without permission?

Try going and standing outside Barnes and Noble and handing out free photocopoes of Ron Paul's book. See how long before Ron Paul gets pissed at you. Because he will. Ron Paul is NOT in favor of copyright infringement. No sane person would be. (Which is why it is such a popular topic on these boards.)

Dr. Ron Paul doesn't have a problem with copyright infringement as much as he has a problem with talking negatively about the American Gandhi named Abraham Lincoln. The title of Ron Paul's next book needs to be "My baptism and why I have come to love Abraham Lincoln." This will increase the sales of his other books tremendously.

 

[Give me liberty]

If this bill pass i know there might be a new Revolution over freedom of right.

Just wait and see.

 

[Uncle Emanuel Watkins]

We should work to protect the 99% of the internet that is garbage.

people will continue taking it on their knees until it actually affects them.

Taking it on their knees? A lot in our nation are willing to put their feet behind their heads and bark in Chinese.

 

[pcosmar]

I wonder how much time they want to spend on a Supercomputer to break a 256 bit encryption in three cascading layers, Only to get my recipe for Pumpkin Butter.
http://www.truecrypt.org/

 

[Dr.3D]

I wonder how much time they want to spend on a Supercomputer to break a 256 bit encryption in three cascading layers, Only to get my recipe for Pumpkin Butter.
http://www.truecrypt.org/

Better yet, now much time do they want to spend on a Supercomputer to break a 256 bit encryption in three cascading layers, only to get a jpg picture of me giving them the finger?

 

[FindLiberty]

I see your point, choke the system...

I don't understand the prior comments about RP's book and the tyrant, Lincoln

 

[Dieseler]

I wonder how much time they would spend without a Supercomputer to break a 256 bit encryption in three cascading layers, only to frame you for some shit they put there themselves.
If they want you they will get you.
Happens a lot on the side of the road I hear.
Patriots should leave their shit at home to say the least and definitely keep their nose clean.
All they need is a reason and you're out of the game.

 

[Dr.3D]

I wonder how much time they would spend without a Supercomputer to break a 256 bit encryption in three cascading layers, only to frame you for some shit they put there themselves.
If they want you they will get you.
Happens a lot on the side of the road I hear.
Patriots should leave their shit at home to say the least and definitely keep their nose clean.
All they need is a reason and you're out of the game.

They don't even need a reason and they can still find a way to get you 'out of the way'.

 

[Dieseler]

They don't even need a reason and they can still find a way to get you 'out of the way'.

That goes without saying I guess.

Edit: I think that was the point I was making now that I think about it a little more.

 

[pcosmar]

I wonder how much time they would spend without a Supercomputer to break a 256 bit encryption in three cascading layers, only to frame you for some shit they put there themselves.
If they want you they will get you.
Happens a lot on the side of the road I hear.
Patriots should leave their shit at home to say the least and definitely keep their nose clean.
All they need is a reason and you're out of the game.

True dat.
But I also use an operating system that does not have the same inherent security problems as a certain well know and widely available system. The file system is different and less easy to mess with.
If they want to make up evidence they can, but I am not that big of fish.
I am the resistance. Whether out here or inside (been there before) I will still resist.
As long as I am sucking air.

 

[LiveFree79]

Dr. Ron Paul doesn't have a problem with copyright infringement as much as he has a problem with talking negatively about the American Gandhi named Abraham Lincoln. The title of Ron Paul's next book needs to be "My baptism and why I have come to love Abraham Lincoln." This will increase the sales of his other books tremendously.

Been reading DiLorenzo again? That guy and his books (the Real Lincoln and Lincoln unmasked) are a joke and are as much an example of revisionist history as the modern day garbage you'd criticize comes out of the highly revised public school system. I suggest you learn how to think for yourself and not spoon feed someone else's opinions (that's what DiLorenzo's are not facts) because they fit your agenda. Lincoln was not the great President American public education nor American society makes him out to be. But to categorize him as one of the worst is at best laughable.