War is Gay

acptulsa said:
He's got a Libertarian Party budget, and he's trying to compete with Klaus Schwab's Clown World for attention in an effort to sell boring, old fashioned sanity. How would you go about it?
Click to expand...

If Im reading you correctly, the only response I could offer is that I wouldn't bother, given it is a waste of time at best, or a dishonest waste of time in the worse case.
 
ClaytonB said:
I think the intended message is this: "War is serious business. It should be fought by serious, heterosexual men just as our ancestors did when they stormed the beaches of Normandy. All of this diversity crap is putting the 'National Security' at risk. So I'm going to make fun of the Woke diversity crap that is infesting the US military leadership."
Click to expand...

Perhaps he should hire you to do his writing for him because his sucks the big tuna.

Of course, just war is a serious business. But there is no overlap that I am aware of between the activities of the Pentagon and just war. What the Pentagon imagines war to be is, indeed, just high f@ggotry, and deserves to be mocked as such. Whether the creators of the video are actually anti-war, I don't know. It seems to be a plea to salvage the Military Industrial Complex before it is put in a tutu and made to balance a circus-ball on its nose. But maybe the sarcasm is British-dry and I missed it...
Click to expand...

Excluding our tiffs with the Brits, may they rot in hell, I sincerely ask whether we have ever engaged in just warring.

Whiskey Rebellion: perhaps the first example of overt, violence-manifested corruption. Noting the relevant dates, we see that the first Congress wasted absolutely no time at all, initiating the cycle of corruption that continues to this day. So much for the purported good intentions of the Framers. The antifederalists were right, the federalists dead-wrong.

Some will cite WWII as just. Wrong. Having allowed ourselves to be suckered into WW I by the filthy British, whom we should have allowed to be genocided by Germany - only the Germans were far too gentlemanly to have finished that just and righteous work, thereby ridding humanity of one of the deepest and most dangerous evils ever to befoul the earth. America was the proximate enabling factor in the rise of Hitler. Had Germany prevailed, an equitable peace would have been reached, no Versailles, and therefore no significant possibility of a Hitler-like figure rising from the ashes of a land that had been unnecessarily and hypocritically brought to economic ruin by Britain and France.

When all is said and done, it's all been shit pretty much since before the ink dried on the Constitution, a cute but ultimately feckless document, with the exception of the BoR.
 
ClaytonB said:
I think the intended message is this: "War is serious business. It should be fought by serious, heterosexual men just as our ancestors did when they stormed the beaches of Normandy. All of this diversity crap is putting the 'National Security' at risk. So I'm going to make fun of the Woke diversity crap that is infesting the US military leadership."
Click to expand...

Can a person be against both woke bullshit and also war? What if someone made a video mocking both simultaneously? What if someone was noticing that the establishment uses both woke bullshit and war for their purposes? What if that ties the whole thing together? Not everyone uses simplistic Democrat or Republican thinking.
 
osan said:
If Im reading you correctly, the only response I could offer is that I wouldn't bother, given it is a waste of time at best, or a dishonest waste of time in the worse case.
Click to expand...

medical-ennui-torpor-bored-weariness-tiredness-lka0087_low.jpg
 
The Rebel Poet said:
Can a person be against both woke bull$#@! and also war? What if someone made a video mocking both simultaneously? What if someone was noticing that the establishment uses both woke bull$#@! and war for their purposes? What if that ties the whole thing together? Not everyone uses simplistic Democrat or Republican thinking.
Click to expand...

:shrugging: You just might be right. I was only sharing my impression and the only data I have to go off is the video itself since I know nothing about the guy who made it. If you're right, you're right. I just got the impression that this video is supposed to be a kind of "get the gays out of the military and make war heterosexual again!" thing. But impressions are merely subjective.
 
osan said:
Perhaps he should hire you to do his writing for him because his sucks the big tuna
Click to expand...

Whatever the views of the people that put the video together, I agree with you, because the writing is kind of all over the place. Criticism is cheap and easy, but creation is costly and difficult; so I applaud them for putting together the video and for pointing out that wokism in the military is insanity.

Excluding our tiffs with the Brits, may they rot in hell, I sincerely ask whether we have ever engaged in just warring.
Click to expand...

It's a tough question, for sure. There are no easy answers. I do think we have to be careful when judging our ancestors not to fall into the fallacy of presentism. We have 20/20 hindsight, they did not. For seven years or so, I really believed we had been attacked on 9/11 in the way we were told. I rejected all of the post-911 insanity, including Guantanamo Bay, Patriot Act, MCA, NDAA, Iraq and even Afghanistan (there was no need to invade to stop terrorists, if they really are just terrorists and not nation-state actors), etc. But there was a time when I was in college where I started preparing to enter the military because I just got sucked into the whole national defense insanity. The point is that the siren's song of the Deep State is powerfully enchanting and even very politically level-headed people are susceptible to get dragged into its death-embrace. And this problem is made all the worse when you are in "the fog of war", that is, you don't have the benefit of historical 20/20 hindsight.

You can go too far in justifying historical war propagandists with this line of reasoning but I also think that you can't neglect to take it into account. I don't believe that American soldiers invading the beaches of Normandy were just a bunch of bloodthirsty thugs looking for a chance to kill. The overwhelming majority of them believed we were there for just reasons so, in the sight of God, they were fighting a just war (I mean, as they will stand in Judgment Day). Do I believe that the decision-makers in London, DC, etc. were motivated by a just cause? No. The war was fought for calculated reasons in order to expand the geopolitical empire centered on DC. So, it's a weird situation in which the war itself was absolutely unjust, but almost all the grunts fighting on the ground were innocent by virtue of ignorance. For them, it was, indeed, a just war.
 
Watch for that term "EQUAL OUTCOME" as it is a Red Flag that of a FASCIST IDEA.

Equal Outcome needs to be understood for what it is; a disincentive for those that produce to stop producing. If some people work has hard as they possibly can, and their end result is exactly the same as the people that have not tried AT ALL, then why would anyone even try?

Those in power KNOW this. And as soon as people dont try, they blame those same people for being LAZY. Hegalian Dialectic, Problem Reaction Solution. Of course when they have the excuse they were looking for, they blame THAT as being the SOURCE of the Problem, not their policies to begin with.
 
Occam's Banana said:
Democracy is Gay

https://twitter.com/AymanMSNBC/status/1518038654492491776
K31QCFt.png
Click to expand...

So I'm pretty sure that most anti-statists have arrived at that highly counter-intuitive position as a result of lived experiences, aka, abuse at the hands of the State. This fact is precisely why the State needs to surround itself with a cadre of "abused minorities" which are, in fact, highly privileged minorities in disguise. Have every kind of pride-flag you want, but the black-and-yellow will never be a valid form of diversity. It will always, through some infinitely tortured logic, equate to anti-semitism, homophobia, male dominance, bigotry, racism, anti-freedom, pro-slavery, etc. etc. etc.

image.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Swordsmyth
Hegseth Orders Navy to Strip Name of Gay Rights Icon Harvey Milk from Ship
Replies
0
Views
25
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
Occam's Banana
  • Featured
Scott Horton @ Lex Fridman: The Case Against War and the Military Industrial Complex
Replies
3
Views
1K
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
SCOTUS is formally asked to overturn gay marriage ruling
2
Replies
25
Views
285
Anti Globalist
Anti Globalist
Brian4Liberty
  • Featured
Remember the great Justin Raimondo, critic of the warfare-welfare state
Replies
0
Views
33
Brian4Liberty
Brian4Liberty
Brian4Liberty
  • Featured
The 'War On Narco-Terrorism' Is The New 'War On Terrorism'...And Will End Just As Badly
Replies
15
Views
77
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Back
Top