Voter Fraud verified in NH primary

lasenorita said:
Boston.com looks like they have their table messed up. Switch the figures for Ron -> McCain, Romney -> Ron, Tancred0 -> Romney, Thompson -> Tancredo, aaargh! It's so confusing because the numbers are jumping around. (>_<)

However, the total votes at the very bottom seem to correspond to the right candidate. See http://www.politico.com/nhprimaries/xml/P_R_NH_0_31146_1.xml for the latest totals. Also, check out http://ronrox.com/paulstats.php for the correct figures by town. Data was taken from Politico.com (which is also from AP).
Click to expand...

I dunno, one would have to believe that they (boston.com) would have had someone paying attention to the data that was posted on their own website throughout a primary night wouldn't they?
 
Ah...yes!

The numbers agree with Rasmussen. And, Rasmussen didn't include Independents in their polls. Ron Paul should have gotten much higher than Rasmussen by definition (he didnt)--otherwise no Independent voters voted for him--highly unlikely to impossible.

So the results say only Republicans voted for Ron Paul. A pox on that!

It's all bullchit.
 
Last edited:
Yes, but that would just mean their incompetent. It's fairly obvious just eye-balling the whole table that the figures are all wrong: There's a whole bunch of 0's, 1's, 2's for McCain. I saw the same table hours ago, and it looked fine* then. Whatever they did to make the "Write-In" and "Other" columns visible messed up their data.

*Just wanted to clarify: the numbers assigned were okay, but the the columns for "Write-In" and "Other" were not visible then.
 
Boston error

ksu_s13 said:
How do you know?
Click to expand...

Because I checked the table and reported (twice) that the columns of results had been moved one over to the right. It is strange that the totals did not move with them and there are questions about how this affects the other results but it seems more likely that it is simply an alignment error and not anything more sinister. The problems are further back in the process, probably at the tabulating source, the software program. I believe there have been potential problems identified in this area.
 
well these election results work--as long as you believe in the impossible!
 
The guy who called in is on these boards. In another thread he said he was referring to the claims on these boards that people had indeed voted for Ron Paul in Sutton. He referred to them as his "friend".
 
Molly1 said:
Is New Hampshire really that braindead?

It's a yellow state? With a smattering of red?

I don't get this. It doesn't look anything like the understood NH demographics.

The whole state voted for the 100 years war?
Click to expand...

I find it hard to believe that over 40% of the Republicans that wanted our troops to come home voted for McCain. It appears that some entity is making a mockery of this election process. They are giving us huge hints that they are fixing it while laughing at us while they do it. They want a confrontation to occur it appears. Whoever they are they do not fear us in the least.
 
jupiter said:
I wanted to share this information from my other post:

I am a wall street quantitative analyst, I decided to do a simple statistical significance test of Ron Paul receiving 0 votes in Sutton County.

First, the facts:
Sutton county: 378 votes cast
Ron Paul average across the state: 0.0774

Assumptions:
We will use a binomial distribution (as n is not very large).
We will assume that this county is representative of the averages of the rest of the state.

Probability that Ron Paul receives a vote: 0.0774
Probability that he does not: 1 - 0.0774


According to a simple binomial distribution probability calculator:
http://www.stat.tamu.edu/~west/apple...omialdemo.html

The probability that Ron Paul receives "0" votes: 0.000

The actual probability is greater than zero, but less than 1e-3. An exceedingly small number.

With an approximately 50% probability, Ron Paul should have received roughly 28-29 votes.

This is statistically extremely improbable. The binomial assumption is valid. The assumption that can't be validated, however, is that this county is representative of the entire state.

There is definitely something fishy going on. Statisticians, physicists, etc. please feel free to contribute.
Click to expand...

Thanks. Take a look at this precinct:

GREENVILLE (100% reporting)

McCain 86
Huckabee 32
Giuliani 16
Hunter 5
"OTHER" 5
Romney 0
Paul 0
Thompson 0

What are the chances of Paul, Romney and Thompson all getting 0 votes while Hunter got 5 and other no-name candidates got 5?
 
jupiter said:
I wanted to share this information from my other post:

I am a wall street quantitative analyst, I decided to do a simple statistical significance test of Ron Paul receiving 0 votes in Sutton County.

First, the facts:
Sutton county: 378 votes cast
Ron Paul average across the state: 0.0774

Assumptions:
We will use a binomial distribution (as n is not very large).
We will assume that this county is representative of the averages of the rest of the state.

Probability that Ron Paul receives a vote: 0.0774
Probability that he does not: 1 - 0.0774

According to a simple binomial distribution probability calculator:
http://www.stat.tamu.edu/~west/apple...omialdemo.html

The probability that Ron Paul receives "0" votes: 0.000

The actual probability is greater than zero, but less than 1e-3. An exceedingly small number.

With an approximately 50% probability, Ron Paul should have received roughly 28-29 votes.

This is statistically extremely improbable. The binomial assumption is valid. The assumption that can't be validated, however, is that this county is representative of the entire state.

There is definitely something fishy going on. Statisticians, physicists, etc. please feel free to contribute.
Click to expand...

I agree - so where are we with repording/dealing with this - we have little time. What can I do to help.
 
Using same methods,


Chances of Paul getting 0 in greenville: 0.0000110411 or about 1 and 1 hundred thousand.

Chances of Romney getting 0 in greenville: 0.00000000000000000000000161879 or about 1 in ...uh, is bajillion a word?
That's a pretty small number.

And yet both happened.
 
The link below is the proof of faulty voting machines and how they can be tampered with! The RP campaighn has known about this for over a year but has ignored it! We should all email the RP campaign and let them know that the people that are funding this campaign want something done now! Ron Paul is not responsible personally, but his campaign is!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Piia...s/vote_fraud_expert_warns_of_nh_chicanery.htm
 
Jeremiah said:
This morning, before I checked the results, I had a conviction that Dr. Paul would have 8% to conform to the final poll by Rasmussen. My thought was that if this happened it would be a confirmation that the results had been tampered with. ...
Click to expand...

I thought the same thing.. .as i was watching Rudy above us at 9% i told my girlfriend that if he beat out RP in NH of all places, and RP couldn't get a higher % than he did in Iowa that i'd be 100% convinced that the primary results did not represent the vote.


well... i'm convinced. :-(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Occam's Banana
NJ - City council ex-president charged in voter fraud scheme
Replies
6
Views
526
TheTexan
TheTexan
J
YUMA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE OPENS MASSIVE VOTER FRAUD INVESTIGATION AFTER 2000 MULES
Replies
5
Views
599
ClaytonB
ClaytonB
J
Local Election Boards Are Battleground for Those Concerned About Election Fraud, Ban Dominion
Replies
0
Views
312
James_Madison_Lives
J
donnay
How to Steal an Election
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
kahless
kahless
Anti Federalist
The Red Mirage - The same methods used to swindle vote totals in 2020 are in use again
Replies
19
Views
1K
Brian4Liberty
Brian4Liberty
Back
Top