Voter Fraud verified in NH primary

Your statistical method fails a primitive assumption that there exists ANY correlation betweens towns in New Hampshire to begin with. If a correlation did exist, you have not investigated if there is an underlying reason that would make that data set contrary to the correlation. You're assuming randomness or trend without a reason to expect it. Looking at who they did vote for, with the exception of McCain, they all have a specific healthcare plan. Kucinich even did twice as well in Sutton than he did in the state overall.

So.... what you're saying is...

there could be something in the water?
 
Last edited:
OK, CNN, Politico, AP all report polls closed at 11:00 PM with zero votes for Paul and Romney.
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/county/#val=NHREP9

Nashua is reporting that Romney actually won and Paul got 25 votes.
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=news0807

Does it get any more clear than this?

How do we ESCALATE THIS ISSUE?

Well damn, if one precinct is wrong, we have to assume that they're all wrong. Where do we get the right data?
 
Back
Top