Voter fraud again? Polls were way off!

To be honest, I hope Romney can pull this into a win in South Carolina. That could only mean good things for us. What we seem to be banking on is a big enough super Tuesday to take this to convention. If McCain has his "surge" beaten back, and we see him drop back to Iowa levels, along with a Huckabee who no longer has momentum from Iowa, we might very well start seeing some lower levels of turnout again.

Only better for us...
I'm pulling for a Thompson win in SOuth Carolina-keep him in the race through Super Tuesday to split up the southern vote and the delegates all spread out.

Yes, that is correct- it is all fraud, you imbeciles-everyone in four states is part of a vast conspiracy...either that or the bulk of the electorate has only heard of Ron Paul because morons keep talking about Tower 7 collapsing, vaccines killing us and other conspiracy theories.
 
We are not allowing any more fraud posts until the NH recount is over. Sorry. Please remove post.

How about no fraud posts without actual evidence, and only from people that are precinct captains that would actually know if the vote was lower than what they made sure of.
 
I tend to think fraud and theft did happen in New Hampshire because there is some evidence pointing to it, but there is no evidence for Michigan yet, and since it is not a very important state I doubt much theft or fraud happened there. The states in the primaries I would expect to see fraud and theft IF it does happen, would be New Hampshire, SC, Florida, California, and New York, and maybe not too many others.

The real question is... IF vote fraud is taking place, then HOW is it taking place?

If it's Diebold machines, then they should be eliminated FOREVER.
 
What is it the dad in So I Married an Axe Murderer said? It is a conspiracy led by Col. Sanders and Queen Elizabeth. The more you shitheadstalk about fraud, the more votes you lose for the campaign.
 
The real question is... IF vote fraud is taking place, then HOW is it taking place?

If it's Diebold machines, then they should be eliminated FOREVER.

Diebold have been proven fraudulent many, many times. It should be the other way around, people assume there's fraud unless there's explicit evidence otherwise.

But people are disappointing.
 
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



CCOONNNNSSSSSPPIIIRRRAAAACCCYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


NO no NO NO NO


please stop and just resolve to work harder and get other people working harder.
 
What is it the dad in So I Married an Axe Murderer said? It is a conspiracy led by Col. Sanders and Queen Elizabeth. The more you shitheadstalk about fraud, the more votes you lose for the campaign.

The more you assholes ignore the idiocy of running voting systems that can allow an entire election to be rigged by ONE PERSON, the sooner we can kiss our freedom goodbye forever.
 
Like they say, "that's why they play the game."

Polls obviously aren't infallible. That's why we actually have elections. Just ask President Dewey.
 
Is that how you respond to my reasonable observation that the polls do not match the results?

THEY NEVER DO! So stop it already. :mad: Im so sick of the fraud crap. You sound like a bunch of whiney little kids. There is more fraud then you can shake a stick at. The entire government is corrupt to the core, why do you think we are fighting to get RP in? :rolleyes: Enough!!!
 
The talk of fraud is premature, since the concrete evidence indicating it hasn't shown up yet. In NH last week, it took a day or two to get those clear cut indications. Those who demand such evidence should drop the other shoe, and encourage those thinking it may exist put their money where their mouth is and support an investigation to GET the proof.

There is a double message being sent by skeptics, one of "don't talk about fraud unless you have the evidence"---while also saying "don't look for any evidence, just move on to work towards the next primary." Come on, you can't have it both ways!
 
There is a double message being sent by skeptics, one of "don't talk about fraud unless you have the evidence"---while also saying "don't look for any evidence, just move on to work towards the next primary." Come on, you can't have it both ways!

+1
 
I'm sick of hearing people say that the only reason we aren't doing well is because of fraud. More conspiracies. Maybe we should point blame to the paid campaign staff at how they handled Dr. Paul's bid for the Presidency thus far ... and of course blame the sheeple for being uninformed.
 
I watched the count. No fraud. Diebold though. sucked. I saw the ballots. It took two people to run the machine, a republican and a democrat. They were old. A old black lady and an old white man. They were typical area people. Definitely not part of some global conspiracy to screw ron paul and hype Mittens.
 
Democrats voted for Romney on purpose. They did it to stat fights between republicans and divert the republicans from attacking democrats.

I don't buy this. If they were that smart they would be voting for Ron Paul.
 
Back
Top