Voted for Jill Stein

Where where the female voters, backing their up their sisters? If blacks can disgrace MLK's "content of character" and blindly vote for Obama, then I think the ladies were due some tribalist voting.
 
Jill Stein is too socialist for me, but at least the lady is honest, which is more than I can say about other candidates. Good for you for voting your conscience!
 
My 10 year old son, who knew full well that I was voting 3rd party, told me "I hope your not voting for the Green Party. That lady's awful!" Oh yeah, and he loves animals and the environment and literally doesn't like it when I kill files. Even child tree huggers can see through Jill Stein. That said, it's your vote. And if I had to choose between Stein, Obama and Romney I'd....I'd.....I'd say go ahead shoot me! :D Seriously though, with her being (supposedly) antiwar and pro civil liberties I'd take her over Obama and Romney the same way I'd have taken McKinney or Kucinich. But that's the only reason.
 
She's very pro foreign aid and pro-UN...her foreign policy isn't ideal either.

It's not aggressive and highly violent though either. At the end of the day the dude came and voted his conscience. That's what we've been asking people to do in regards to Ron Paul. Vote your conscience instead of just who you think will win. The argument is universal. Just because we feel Ron Paul is right about most things doesn't mean that someone else might not feel that way about someone else. And if they are wrong, try to reeducate them in a way that they will actually listen and not leave and never come back. Know what I mean?
 
She is an U.N. type internationalist. Not really a great foreign policy at all.

I'll take some wars in the Middle East over global governance any day.

Stein would basically turn this country into Greece, which is peaceful and look how they turned out.
 
I agree with a few of her stances, but her blatant socialism and UN orientation are huge deal breakers.
 
She's only 'good' on foreign policy by accident. Humanitarian wars? She's there!

Where have I heard that before...

Oh right!

CihGS.jpg
 
It's not aggressive and highly violent though either. At the end of the day the dude came and voted his conscience. That's what we've been asking people to do in regards to Ron Paul. Vote your conscience instead of just who you think will win. The argument is universal. Just because we feel Ron Paul is right about most things doesn't mean that someone else might not feel that way about someone else. And if they are wrong, try to reeducate them in a way that they will actually listen and not leave and never come back. Know what I mean?

Depends what you mean by highly violent. UN peacekeepers have been known to be highly violent. Brutal tyrants and warlords are propped up and wars are fought using US foreign aid money.
 
Depends what you mean by highly violent. UN peacekeepers have been known to be highly violent. Brutal tyrants and warlords are propped up and wars are fought using US foreign aid money.

I mean her foreign policy is many steps in the right direction. Her stances on civil liberties are also in the right direction. That doesn't mean that she isn't wrong on virtually everything. Doesn't make it right to attack the dude for voting for her. It makes it so hard to get people to stay in our cause when we attack everyone we don't agree with and act as if we are experts on every subject simply because we support Ron Paul. It is madness and we will not win if we continue acting this way.
 
Back
Top