But Keith, the only reason someone like Ron Paul can do well in NH is because it is so small and they have so much time in which to campaign there.
I don't know what the difference between impossible and much more impossible is. I'm not only looking for pro-liberty people to win. I'm also looking for other things like ease of use and transparency. I nationwide primary would defeat the whole purpose of spread out primaries, IMO. I like the idea of candidates being vetting by the people.If things went your proposed direction and more states went to primaries, it would be that much more impossible for a non-establishment, non-super-rich candidate to have any chance of competing. If the nominee were decided via one big (transparent!) nationwide primary all held on the same day, would that help or hurt a Ron Paul? I think it clearly would hurt.
That's certainly not a process I want to be a part of it. Heck, I would never encourage anyone to be a part of it unless I was getting paid to encourage them to...No, I think things should go the opposite direction: more convoluted processes, more hours upon hours of sitting through meetings required in order to vote. More caucuses, fewer primaries. We have the committed cadre so we can compete in caucuses.
LOL, very good point!I don't know what the difference between impossible and much more impossible is.
Ha, ha, nope, I'm not getting paid. And certainly it's not a lot of fun to be a part of time-wasting meetings. But what about time-wasting stuff that goes with primaries, like canvassing?That's certainly not a process I want to be a part of it. Heck, I would never encourage anyone to be a part of it unless I was getting paid to encourage them to...![]()
I'm not only looking for pro-liberty people to win.
I might look into getting the 3rd CD delegates disqualified at the state convention. If they want to play it this way, it's going to be long, drawn-out, and as ugly as it needs to be.
Please guys, no Ben Swann, and no twitter bombs on this one.
Video/Audio recordings and charts are one thing... But this is a typical "he said she said" predicament. Making a big deal over hearsay accusations is not going to do the Paul campaign any favors.
Pick your battles guys.
Ha, ha, nope, I'm not getting paid. And certainly it's not a lot of fun to be a part of time-wasting meetings. But what about time-wasting stuff that goes with primaries, like canvassing?
If the story is true, and I wouldn't doubt it is, then every last illegally disqualified Paul delegate needs to show up at the convention and make a stink. Make allies with other delegates at the convention and have them motion (and second), then have a vote (and call for division...standing vote) under Robert's Rules to have your delegates certified. Put the chairman on the spot and make him accountable for his bullshit in front of the entire convention!
There's a video floating around here somewhere of a similar situation that arose at another county convention where Paul delegates were disqualified by the credentials committee over alleged registration issues and they were then voted onto the delegate roster by motion, second and division vote. Was it Minnesota? I can't remember. Ill try to find it. If anyone has it handy please post it up. Beat the cheating bastard with the Rules.
Here it is. Oklahoma County.
What kind of person threatens to punch a septegenarian in the face? I wish this would go viral. He needs to resign in disgrace.