Video update: Ron Paul interview with John King on CNN (1/27)

[CasualApathy]

He did fine in that clip.

 

[IterTemporis]

Wow.. He is really going all out. That was a great response.

 

[ohgodno]

Did well… so far. Shot it down.

 

[Wyle]

he did well

 

[FrancisMarion]

I wish I was a lip reader.

 

[cdw]

*Just shakes head*

 

[Tyler_Durden]

Their pulling another Gloria Borger strategy by not showing the entire interview....

 

[jkr]

luved it

thats it! DEFEND YOURSELF!

b strong

 

[IterTemporis]

"He doesnt have the money.." "Seems unlikely that he's going to catch fire."

 

[Mark37snj]

We have 2 choices:

1) The gloves come off and the campaign suffers the consequences of our actions
2) We laugh at how PATHETIC and DESPERATE the establishment is and get back to campaigning, we have allies in the media, they will handle these clowns

 

[Diurdi]

I think whoever tried to smear him went over the top. If she had said "he often reviewed them" etc, it could've been believeable. But to say "he was there every day and proof read all of them" is just not believable.

 

[Dublin4Paul]

"Testy?" Lol. He was a shitload more tame than I would be. He answered it faily well, and it seems like the more positive parts of the interview are being played later. I don't want to jinx it, but the bullet may have been dodged.

 

[kathy88]

Boss looked mad. But you could tell from his body language he was telling the truth.

 

[rb3b3]

check my voting record first to see if i am racist!!!!!!!! yeah john king check his fkn record u scmbg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! or please please come up with something better the a newsletter from 20 years ago that he didnt write!!!! im getting tired and bored of having to defend ron about these newsletters that have been debunked months ago!!!!!! GREAT ANSWER DR PAUL!!!!!!!

 

[kathy88]

They have absolutely nothing else. So desperate.

 

[FrancisMarion]

They have absolutely nothing else. So desperate.

that's right

 

[JohnGalt23g]

Friday night report of a story that was stale when it "broke" four years ago.

Let it pass by.

 

[braane]

I think whoever tried to smear him went over the top. If she had said "he often reviewed them" etc, it could've been believeable. But to say "he was there every day and proof read all of them" is just not believable.

That's how I saw it.

I think Ron's response was pretty awesome. Best one he has given on it yet. "How could I... the office wasn't even in the town I lived in"

 

[randomname]

I just went to the Politico to see if the smears are on yet. I remember when their frontpage was plastered with hitpieces against him ahead of Iowa.

Today it's 2 Negative pieces on Paul, 20 positive pieces on Newt:
"Paul ignores Fla. at debate, on trail"
"Report: Paul OK'd racist parts of newsletters"

 

[FrancisMarion]

they have broken the interview up: the first part he defended himself well. they will not show that part when they show the second half at 6:30 when people switch from the local news....