VIDEO: Ted Cruz welcomes Rand Paul supporters

[limequat]

What a dick.

with pralines.

 

[Origanalist]

Question: If Cruz's foreign policy stances are the reason why people in the liberty movement shouldn't support Cruz, then why should people in the liberty movement have supported Rand? Rand broke from the non interventionist foreign policy ideology. He supported sanctions on Iran, foreign military bases, sanctions on Russia, military action against ISIS, military action to protect Israel if they got attacked, wouldn't take military action against Iran off the table, didn't advocate withdrawing from Nato, voted for military aid to Ukraine, etc. Rand has a long list of ways in which he deviated from a non interventionist foreign policy. But yet we're supposed to hate Cruz just because he also deviates from a non interventionist foreign policy. Is this just because Cruz's last name isn't "Paul?" It just seems like a double standard to me.

Maybe because Cruz is a slimy used car salesman in the pocket of Goldman Sachs and a fan of John Bolton etc.. To compare the two is ridiculous.

 

[Brett85]

Maybe because Cruz is a slimy used car salesman in the pocket of Goldman Sachs and a fan of John Bolton etc.. To compare the two is ridiculous.

I'm not saying that Cruz and Rand are the same on foreign policy. Obviously Rand is better. But, Rand is obviously not a non interventionist on foreign policy either. So if the standard is that you can only vote for a candidate who supports a non interventionist foreign policy, then Rand doesn't meet that standard either.

 

[Michael Landon]

Fuck him.

- ML

 

[TheTexan]

Sorry cruz, NOBT

 

[Kords21]

Cruz is a guy I would never walk in front of, since if it would benefit him he'd stab me in the back. I wish more people would see through this snake. He's no friend to liberty, he's in it for Ted and Ted only.

 

[sparebulb]

GOA endorsed Cruz months ago. I unsubscribed, grr

Good to know.

GOA is dead to me now.

Maybe the NRA will support Hitlery.

 

[The Gold Standard]

Rot in hell asshole.

 

[Chester Copperpot]

Rot in hell asshole.

my sentiments exactly

 

[fcreature]

Sorry Rafael, I regret every penny I gave you during your Senate campaign. GTFO.

 

[squirl22]

I'm n ot watching any videos of ted cruz. he will not be getting vote ever for anything even dog catcher. he is a lying scumbag...another nixon in the making.

 

[Jan2017]

Girl says I don't want to (lip reading)

No means No Way Teddy -

Ii is Super Bowl 50 weekend and I really feel like slamming something,
and now that you effed this all up so much and destroyed this message and campaign -
you are gonna be the one slammed.

Rafael E. Cruz, Jr. has a kinda weird attack look - not appealling to voters or even underage school girls - dirty ole Canadian man or whoever you are - groping charge (?)
FBI may need the Ottawa government assistance in investigating their native born son.
He just revoked his Canada dual citizenship in May 2014, a partial US citizenship would not make
you eligible for the US Senate from Texas.

Rand, Bernie, and Rubio can co-sponsor a bill for your Senate impeachment proceedings.

Fraudulently obrtained funds - under the pretense of commander of the american Army eligibility -
can even be returned to donors with triple punitive damages, as well as the cause of action against RNC fraudulent misrepresentation of the candidate.

Canada tax returns can be requested for the 1970-1974 Rafael Cruz Sr. and Eleanor Elizabeth Wilson (nee/maiden name Eleanor Darragh) years -

Using your mommy citizenship won't work for you - the US dual-citizen living abroad would need to file a US Tax return of course,
but if she didn't and didn't claim that runt kid from Calgary with the oversize head as a US dependent from 1970-1974,
you may have not been naturalized at all without that automatic dual citizenship thing-y you rely on.

A point in your favor IF she did file her Wilson family (or maiden name family) US taxes, but then if you used any of those Canada entitlements in 1970 - 1974 (and I am kinda gonna count your Canadian pre-natal care since March as well as the first free Canada pediatric care - then you have negated that US dual citizenship from your native land home - so what year were you naturalized to the US after all councilor solicitor-general ?.
. . .all 'cause I supported a couple of doctors from Texas like this guy . . . you piece of chit!

 

[EBounding]

Ted Cruz sent me a "check" yesterday. It was a check to send back to him so it can be doubled by an anonymous donor. I'm not making this up.

 

[Deborah K]

I, somehow got on his email list. Never would I donate money nor time to him. Thank Rand/Ron inc., for selling my info to him.

 

[Jan2017]

Cruz metradata collection with the help of the big bank money can be quite subversive . . .

I'm wondering if Eleanor Darragh Wilson Cruz - Rafael Jr.'s mommy whom TrusTed must totally rely on for dual citizenship claims -
may have, after all been only a partial US citizen after running off to Canada with a Cuban . . . needed to file her US income taxes to claim Ted a dependent US naturalized citizen 1970-74, but didn't -
and Nixon espionage probably has a late 1960's era picture of Eleanor protesting or something with flowers in her hair dating the subversive Cuban Rafael Cruz, Sr. - damn terrorists. lol

 

[Kotin]

remember that if Cruz were really with us, Rand would probably have endorsed him. He did not do this.

 

[RDM]

 

[Jan2017]

Ted Cruz sent me a "check" yesterday. It was a check to send back to him so it can be doubled by an anonymous donor. I'm not making this up.

sounds like someone is anonymously using the federal mails in interstate commerce for a pyramid scheme . . .

 

[RDM]

I, somehow got on his email list. Never would I donate money nor time to him. Thank Rand/Ron inc., for selling my info to him.

If you ever signed up for Newsmax online or did any online polls requiring email, he is using them to acquire mailing list.

 

[Occam's Banana]

I'm not saying that Cruz and Rand are the same on foreign policy. Obviously Rand is better. But, Rand is obviously not a non interventionist on foreign policy either. So if the standard is that you can only vote for a candidate who supports a non interventionist foreign policy, then Rand doesn't meet that standard either.

That is exactly why Rand doesn't have more (or more enthusiastic) support from non-interventionists. But as you acknowledge, Rand is better on foreign policy than Cruz is. That difference is precisely why some non-interventionists (depending on their tolerance for such things) can decide that Rand is worth supporting but that Cruz is not. It is not the case that just because both Cruz and Rand are not non-interventionists that a non-interventionist must choose only between being willing to support either of them or supporting neither of them. It would not be unreasonable for a non-interventionist to support one of them (Rand) but not the other (Cruz).

(As far as I'm concerned, anyone who can glibly talk about finding out if carpet-bombing could make sand glow in the dark can go fuck himself with a rusty spike - and, yes, that would include Rand if he ever said such a thing.)