Thanks! I missed the first part. I think he did good!
. . . Rand is really setting himself apart from the other neocon and pro PA and surveillance candidates.
As a libertarian, I find myself agreeing with Rand Paul on so many different social and political issues. Unfortunately, however, Paul lacks gravitas as a physical presence. The U.S. presidency has a highly ceremonial aspect. The president isn’t merely a prime minister, a political leader–he’s the symbolic embodiment of the nation. Therefore, physical attributes and vocal style are very important. Despite the cartoons that caricature and ridicule him as a befuddled boy with big ears, Obama has always known how to handle himself as a candidate and then president. He projects a sober, unflappable confidence and presents himself with elegance and grace–all of which produced his success early on, when Hillary was the frontrunner in 2008.
In the primary debates, Cruz will benefit from having a tall and commanding physique, as Bill De Blasio did in the New York mayoral debates. On the whole, Republicans don’t seem to realize that persona and self-presentation are crucial in a media age.
For example, Rand Paul has obviously had his eye on the presidency for years, so it’s astonishing that he apparently has never given any thought to how he should dress or cut his hair or even stand in front of cameras. It’s as if his idea of style was flash-frozen in the Everly Brothers era. The tall candidate often has a big advantage in any campaign. It wasn’t the case with Jimmy Carter, but he was an exception. People do want a sense of implicit authority in the president.
Rand rocked it except for his response to the open-ended closing statement question... it was good, but not as sharp as he's delivered it in the past. At this point (re: a couple days before the 1st debate) he should be have his answer to the all-important "Why you?" question down pat.
Also, while it doesn't bother me in the least, the wild hair look is hurting Rand with lots of "independents" (aka LIVs) who vote based on gut reaction and personal impression rather than policy.
I think Camille Paglia's recent comments on Rand's style/appearance and the broader importance of both looking and acting/playing the part of president in today's media age were pretty spot on.
via: http://www.salon.com/2015/07/30/ted...s_the_gop_field_and_takes_on_hillary_clinton/
Rand rocked it except for his response to the open-ended closing statement question... it was good, but not as sharp as he's delivered it in the past. At this point (re: a couple days before the 1st debate) he should be have his answer to the all-important "Why you?" question down pat.
Also, while it doesn't bother me in the least, the wild hair look is hurting Rand with lots of "independents" (aka LIVs) who vote based on gut reaction and personal impression rather than policy.
I think Camille Paglia's recent comments on Rand's style/appearance and the broader importance of both looking and acting/playing the part of president in today's media age were pretty spot on.
via: http://www.salon.com/2015/07/30/ted...s_the_gop_field_and_takes_on_hillary_clinton/
Okay, people don't like wild hair looks but Trump polls at 20%+
Yeah gonna need a new theory there pal
Okay, people don't like wild hair looks but Trump polls at 20%+
Yeah gonna need a new theory there pal