[Video] Open Mic @Pentagon Press Room "See This Room, 2/3s' of us Laid-Off With Ron Paul"

[ds21089]

Implying that this has been a good run for the Military Industrial Complex?

That's what I was thinking.

 

[BuddyRey]

Wow, you guys are like some kind of trained league of super spies. Keep crackin' that code!

 

[limequat]

I wonder if the companies = the likes of Halliburton and Kellog, Brown, & Root?

Could also be troop companies or the CIA...

 

[Chainspell]

Wow, you guys are like some kind of trained league of super spies. Keep crackin' that code!

hahaha

 

[specsaregood]

I'm also not sure hammering on people being laid off if Ron makes president is to our benefit.

Yeah, but 55% of the american public doesn't like or trust the media.

 

[GomerPile]

http://www.filedropper.com/openmic

filtered from the moxnews video MP3 only (sorry dont have a better place to host if from)...background noise is out so you can hear the conversation clearly.....

 

[HOLLYWOOD]

I'm also not sure hammering on people being laid off if Ron makes president is to our benefit.

I think the latest polls taken, the American people don't trust the media. Yes, this is a double edge sword, but also can't the media be looking out for themselves. They've been sensationalizing everything and anything about DOD/War/Pentagon for circulation/hits/$$$. They basically become the public relations firms for the DOD/gov. Filtering/Censoring the truth... and providing inaccuracies. the CIA even infiltrated the top position at Al-Jazeera... when caught, had to resign.

Wouldn't it be better to have reporters on energy, medical, etc, then war?

Of course it can implied the very press that vilifies Ron Paul on his Foreign/Defense policies are a conflict of interest with their very own jobs.

Like anything, I think a RIF via a phase down of the DOD is best to the voters.

 

[wgadget]

Dang, I hope Ron uses this in the debate!

 

[affa]

i can say this - now that we've got them nailed down to talking about 'The Two War Doctrine' and the merits of being 'fully mobilized' as per WWII, I guarantee this is GOOD for Ron Paul.

 

[Tina]

The thing I find the most disturbing is that they are more worried about their jobs than the future of their own country. It's really mindboggling to me. Surely being journalists, they have more of a clue than your average sleepy sheep as to where we are with this economy and where it's going if Ron Paul is NOT elected. Intense selfishness or intense stupidity?

Worse than not caring about the economy, they don't care about all of the babies and children killed as collateral damage, depleted uranium, polluted, soil, air and water, deformed births, oil spills, dead sea life, PTSD, injured and dead troops, and their devastated families, and on and on.....

 

[Miss Annie]

Worse than not caring about the economy, they don't care about all of the babies and children killed as collateral damage, depleted uranium, polluted, soil, air and water, deformed births, oil spills, dead sea life, PTSD, injured and dead troops, and their devastated families, and on and on.....

Very true Tina. I know that intense selfishness seems like such an inadequate description when looking at all of the implications. It is horrifying what some people are capable of.

 

[NoPants]

Dang, I hope Ron uses this in the debate!

How would he use it? This garbled conversation by a couple of unidentified reporters is nothing more than internet noise. It has no credibility he'll be considered a conspiracy nut for taking it seriously.

 

[KingNothing]

The thing I find the most disturbing is that they are more worried about their jobs than the future of their own country. It's really mindboggling to me.

But they aren't. It was a joke.

 

[wgadget]

made a quick video:



lol made it red like they're in hell....

Awesome, Chainspell! Loved it.

 

[Miss Annie]

But they aren't. It was a joke.

They were joking about two thirds of them being laid off? I guess I don't get the funny about that.

 

[newbitech]

NEED help with the critical sentence at 1:35

It is something like, BUT NOT:
Reporter: This is all good run with the companies if Ron Paul becomes President.
it may be something like 'This has been a good run' (implying Ron Paul will end it). or something else entirely.

The discussion is clearly talking about Ron Paul ending the wars. But what is this sentence? Is it 'company' or 'companies'?

is he saying "this is all going ugly when Ron Paul"...

 

[amonasro]

The problem with removing background noise and high frequencies is that you also tend to muffle the vocal overtones.

So here's what I have so far running through a very revealing DAC that I use for critical audio listening.

(starts at :25)
Reporter 1: We're not denying the accuracy of your story, that was the R&D, got that figured out. We're just, we're not denying, we're acknowledging. We were right at the time. (woman laughs)
Woman: So long as they weren't, uh [streaking/streeping?]
Reporter 1: Sure [inaudible]
Woman: But they haven't, uh, they haven't, the [***is] never gets [inaudible]
Reporter 1: Well we were just discussing that. We did a really close read of this and I thought it said, "whoa, they're saying they're gonna follow [through]"--but see the thing, they're only defeating the aggression, they're not defeating the [***ists] there. Obama said that [inaudible]
Woman: [inaudible] Yes, that's what they can do. They can do one and a half wars.
Reporter 1: (interrupting) This is secondary. This is a one and a half term. We've shown, we've proved over the last ten years, said repeatedly, you can only do one at a time.

Younger Reporter: This is all good run for the company, when Ron Paul becomes President. (woman laughs)
Reporter 2: See this room? Two thirds of us laid off when Ron Paul becomes President. (two men laugh)
Another reporter: Someone emailed me [these corners] two more documents were valid since before Obama was born.
Woman: [It's been invalid]
Reporter 1: Well World War II. We fought two wars.
Woman: Right.
Reporter 1: That's where it comes from, right?
Another: Right.
Reporter 1: [Sick of being here/sip of beer] This'll be fine. God it's like a fully mobilized country with everyone [crowding]... (another laughs)
Woman: [Now it's not important] for the ground troops...
Another man: For the idea also being, from like, [inaudible] troops...

CSPAN Reporter interrupts.

 

[Cowlesy]

+

REP

HOLLYWOOD


Amazing snag there. Up on drudge and circulating.

 

[Philosophy_of_Politics]

What I'm actually seeing here is a definite questioning of Obama's war on Iran by these same reporters. They seem to acknowledge this, and the one male reporter is saying his personal opinion "we can't handle one war, let alone two." They seem to also be acknowledging that they won't let Ron Paul win when the laugh about him becoming president. Which would confirm that the forces that be are going to do everything in their power to prevent this. They also acknowledge, that if Ron Paul wins they know they would be laid off. I imagine this implies that their boss/ceo is forcing them to discredit Paul, or face the reality of being fired.

 

[Deborah K]

What I'm actually seeing here is a definite questioning of Obama's war on Iran by these same reporters. They seem to acknowledge this, and the one male reporter is saying his personal opinion "we can't handle one war, let alone two." They seem to also be acknowledging that they won't let Ron Paul win when the laugh about him becoming president. Which would confirm that the forces that be are going to do everything in their power to prevent this. They also acknowledge, that if Ron Paul wins they know they would be laid off. I imagine this implies that their boss/ceo is forcing them to discredit Paul, or face the reality of being fired.

Sickening. They're totally okay with people dying and the country going broke over all of this.