[Video] Open Mic @Pentagon Press Room "See This Room, 2/3s' of us Laid-Off With Ron Paul"

for you audio guys: compress the hell out of it and add a ton of make up gain to hear what is being said!!
 
actually I'm not sure the audio of the MOXNEWS version is that much better, just the video quality is a lot better and the video is longer. good to have a different source video though.

edit: yeah, the audio it is a little bit better for sure.
 
Last edited:
Impersonators is also a Drudge link, shows video of impersonators from a Ron Paul Pac.
 
I will try this and run it though a higher quality audiophile DAC.

After the compression stage, play around with an EQ to filter out some of the low frequency noise, you should be able to isolate the frequency band of the voices.
 
I just ran this through. Thanks Grado headphones :)

Reporter 2: [Sick of being here/there] right. This'll be fine. It's like a [forty] mobilized countries with everyone [inaudible]

You need to go over this entire transcript more. I found a missing word here or there. and that's 'fully mobilized' though i can't figure out the last word.
 
My version of the initial interaction is quite different from the transcript by amonosro. This is what I got:

Male Reporter (1?): - we're not defeating an adversary...
Female Reporter 1- yea. that's what... (interrupted)
Male Reporter 1 - this is a secondary war...
Female Reporter 1- that's what they can do... they can do one and a half wars
Male Reporter 1 - so this is a one and a half (pause) but in fact we've shown, we've proved, over the past, we proved over the last ten years as I've said repeatedly that we can only do one at a time. We can't fight [twelve? two?] if we want to win this.
Male Reporter 2 - this is all [inaudible] good [run for the company?]. When Ron Paul becomes President [interrupted by laughter]
Male Reporter 1 - See this room - two thirds of us laid off when Ron Paul becomes president.


They then go back to the one war vs. two war argument, and i need to get the exact wording down, but i think one is saying we did multiple fronts during WWII, but someone else points out that's only because we were 'fully mobilized'.

In my humble opinion, these people are discussing the coming Iran War. I think the going argument was that more than one war is dangerous and unsustainable, and that this is good for Ron Paul, since he is the only one (including Obama) that would avoid that and doesn't want to go to war with Iran. Then someone tries to bring up WWII, but is told that we were only capable of that because we were 'fully mobilized'.

This transcript NEEDS to get ironed out. It's big.

HOLY JUNK --
I just figured out the next bit:
'the two war doctrine hasn't been valid since before Obama was born"...

This is EXACTLY what they are discussing. Will finish this pronto.
 
Last edited:
They are worried about being laid off........ maybe one of them should worry about being fired today? LOL
 
Back
Top