[Video] Justin Amash town hall 5/28/19

like the democrats that Amash is siding with? Are you $#@!ing kidding me.

Oh ok. So you're only talking about them, and not expressing a rule that would apply to others who don't think you're innocent until proven guilty.

I had a feeling you were being hypocritical there. But that's for saying it yourself so I didn't have to.
 
Oh ok. So you're only talking about them, and not expressing a rule that would apply to others who don't think you're innocent until proven guilty.

I had a feeling you were being hypocritical there. But that's for saying it yourself so I didn't have to.

Right so lets throw Rand's efforts with Trump away and give the presidency and Senate to the democrats I am sure they won't take our guns.
 
Right so lets throw Rand's efforts with Trump away and give the presidency and Senate to the democrats I am sure they won't take our guns.

It's not my rule, it's yours. Perhaps you should rethink it for this reason.

But be honest, you don't follow your own rule either, as you're admitting now. You only made it up as a pretext for your blind support of Trump. It's only a rule you follow when it supports that cause, and can be discarded if it ever gets in the way of it.
 
It's not my rule, it's yours. Perhaps you should rethink it for this reason.

But be honest, you don't follow your own rule either, as you're admitting now. You only made it up as a pretext for your blind support of Trump. It's only a rule you follow when it supports that cause, and can be discarded if it ever gets in the way of it.
I dont support Trump I support Rand and his efforts, I have gotten more neg reps from Trump supporters than you will ever give me.
 
I dont support Trump I support Rand and his efforts, I have gotten more neg reps from Trump supporters than you will ever give me.

Good. So you are comfortable with making alliances with people who don't believe you are innocent until proven guilty.

Do you stand by this? Or are you going to find some way to weasel back into pretending otherwise so that you can keep making baseless and irrational accusations against Amash?
 
Good. So you are comfortable with making alliances with people who don't believe you are innocent until proven guilty.

Do you stand by this? Or are you going to find some way to weasel back into pretending otherwise so that you can keep making baseless and irrational accusations against Amash?

I stand with Rand I would support him if he ran against Trump whole heartedly.
 
I stand with Rand I would support him if he ran against Trump whole heartedly.

That's great to hear. I just want to make sure that you follow through on what you're saying and admit that you don't really think that someone believing people are guilty until proven innocent is a deal breaker when it comes to cooperating with them for some other cause. Because earlier in the thread you were pretending it was a deal breaker when you couldn't come up with any other basis for your irrational and baseless accusations against Amash.
 
That's great to hear. I just want to make sure that you follow through on what you're saying and admit that you don't really think that someone believing people are guilty until proven innocent is a deal breaker when it comes to cooperating with them for some other cause. Because earlier in the thread you were pretending it was a deal breaker when you couldn't come up with any other basis for your irrational and baseless accusations against Amash.

Lots of reasons for not supporting Amash's impeachment efforts, my very first reason is Pence is worse than Trump. Rand has no rapport with Pence.
 
I like this response:

quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by Superfluous Man
You mean people who want to take your gun first and do due process later?

And also that pathetic 6 year extension of 702 signed January 2018 - by trump himself.

Had to look that number up.....

What is Section 702 surveillance?

Under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), the U.S. government engages in mass, warrantless surveillance of Americans' and foreigners' phone calls, text messages, emails, and other electronic communications.
:warning:You're being monitored closely by Donnell's surveillance grid, don't try anything.
 
Had to look that number up.....


:warning:You're being monitored closely by Donnell's surveillance grid, don't try anything.

Rand said when he spoke to Trump he told him that he doesn't want warrantless spying on the next president or political activists.
 
This lady went nuclear on Justin at his townhall. Shes a Trump supporter but most importantly, she was an Amash supporter first, from his initial 2010 campaign. I have to admit, it doesn't look good. Imagine someone as active as she is, fighting for his primary opponent.

Many "all or nothing Libertarians" love to see this because it's entertaining but it won't be so entertaining if Amash loses his seat.

 
Jesse Watters interviews pro-Trump town hall attendee and calls Justin a "Pelosi Democrat" :rolleyes:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC5NyXPGv80

She made a fair point about FISA abuse but her stammering and forced phrasing of words and checking the phone for her script and lack of conviction in the way she speaks makes me think she was a plant. I sort of think she was paid to do that by whoever is runniing against Amash.
 
Last edited:
She made a fair point about FISA abuse but her stammering and forced phrasing of words and checking the phone for her script and lack of conviction in the way she speaks makes me think she was a plant. I sort of think she was paid to do that by whoever is runniing against Amash.

Are you trying to refute what she said? :confused:
 
Are you trying to refute what she said? :confused:

no just that the way she said the words she was speaking in other peoples words, they weren't her own words. That's why I thought Watter's comment on whether or not she would run against Amash was funny because politicans talk like that sometimes when they are reading from a script.
 
no just that the way she said the words she was speaking in other peoples words, they weren't her own words. That's why I thought Watter's comment on whether or not she would run against Amash was funny because politicans talk like that sometimes when they are reading from a script.

Did you ever think it was bulletpoints she wrote herself to make sure she got her point across without being interrupted/distracted and taken off the points she wanted to make?
 
Did you ever think it was bulletpoints she wrote herself to make sure she got her point across without being interrupted/distracted and taken off the points she wanted to make?

Yeah because you go to political rallys to make points instead of having a rapport with the representative.
 
Let me check my check list of keywords so I can hit every political group possible. I don't really want you to repond to me with any of my points, I don't want you to change your mind on any of this, I just want to have a sound byte so I can go viral and campaign with your competitor against you.
 
Back
Top