[VIDEO] ~ CNN Coverage on "The Oathkeepers"

[Reason]

YouTube - Oath keepers Featured on CNN Guardians of The Republic

 

[ryanduff]

Just another hit piece from the state run media. Would you expect any less from CNN?

 

[Romulus]

ah yes.. and this will again boost the Oathkeepers numbers. nice job CNN!

 

[Dieseler]

Way to go CNN!
Now if we can get all of the other media whores to do a story.

 

[ronpaulhawaii]

The blurb on CNN describes OK as "Anti-Obama" which is complete BS...

 

[ctiger2]

Just donated $25 to the Oathkeepers.

 

[haaaylee]

they are repeating it right now .... ..


and wtf, they mentioned alex jone's 'fall of the republic.' weird.

not that bad of an interview.

 

[Dieseler]

I hope they play that shit all day.

Haha and viewer calls... I love it.

 

[Catatonic]

spin doctors

 

[Epic]

lol they said there is absolutely no reason to believe that a government would take people's guns.

how about the entirety of the history of governments!!

 

[ClayTrainor]

that was some disgraceful reporting, that Mark Potok guy drives me insane any time i see him speak. Hopefully it encourages some viewers to look into the OK organization on their own.

 

[Dieseler]

that was some disgraceful reporting, that Mark Potok guy drives me insane any time i see him speak. Hopefully it encourages some viewers to look into the OK organization on their own.

...and Mark Potok's organization as well. It's falling down around their ears people.

 

[youngbuck]

Militias (oooh, spooky!)

Taking an oath to the Constitution as opposed to the president is BAD!

Listen to the keywords: extremist, fringe, radicalize

CNN = Communist News Network

 

[tremendoustie]

Was that shill for the military really saying that the oathkeeper's refusal to obey these kinds of orders could disrupt the chain of command? So ... they are planning to confiscate people's guns, or issue other unconstitutional orders? That's the only way I could see it being disruptive.

 

[Romulus]

oh no we must nt have people who wont obey mmmmmmmm no cant have that. no critical though. everythings fine go back to sleep.

 

[Bman]

These soldiers have to taken oaths not to take orders to attack and disarm U.S. citizens. Shame on them for being... Constitutional!

 

[Catatonic]

Was that shill for the military really saying that the oathkeeper's refusal to obey these kinds of orders could disrupt the chain of command? So ... they are planning to confiscate people's guns, or issue other unconstitutional orders? That's the only way I could see it being disruptive.

He probably meant the way the military operates. Consider people constantly questioning their orders. Its a borderline strawman I see often from the military.