Venezuela Empties Prisons, Sends Violent Criminals to U.S. Border, Says DHS Report

[Swordsmyth]

The invaders are helping them do what, and how?

Divide the people by advancing tribalism and big government.

 

[acptulsa]

Divide the people by advancing tribalism and big government.

Because prisoners of a communist regime always work in favor of big government, right?

Suppose the Biden Regime shipped all the J6 political prisoners to, say, Colombia. Do you suppose they'd all turn into George Takei?

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Let's be honest:

LMAO at the paid troll.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Because prisoners of a communist regime always work in favor of big government, right?

Suppose the Biden Regime shipped all the J6 political prisoners to, say, Colombia. Do you suppose they'd all turn into George Takei?

Nobody is stupid enough to buy your spin that these are political prisoners that Maduro is releasing.
These are criminals.

 

[acptulsa]

Nobody is stupid enough to buy your spin that these are political prisoners that Maduro is releasing.
These are criminals.

Show me their records.

The difference between you and me is, I said outright, what if...? You're just acting as a parrot for Biden's bureaucrats and Breitbart.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Show me their records.

The difference between you and me is, I said outright, what if...? You're just acting as a parrot for Biden's bureaucrats and Breitbart.

The burden of proof is on you.
Communists keep political opponents in jail and release criminals, you said it yourself about Biden.
And Biden is cooperating with the world's communists to open the border and let them in because America is the #1 target of global communism.

You are parroting the political line of the left that we have no need to fear those invading us, the fact that DHS was forced to admit some truth that contradicts the actions and propaganda of the administration means nothing.

 

[acptulsa]

The burden of proof is on you.

No, it isn't. I said, they could be... And you've been screaming, they aren't they aren't they aren't like a toddler ever since, night after night.

That puts the burden of proof on you. And neither Biden's DHS nor their parrot Breitbart is proof.

And no, I'm not the one parroting anyone. I'm not talking about all migrants collectively, the way both Teh Right and Teh Left are. If there was a way to prove a specific group of them were in fact anti-communist activists, you damned well know how leftists would react. The sky would be falling.

 

[PAF]

The burden of proof is on you.

No, it isn't.

Come on, [MENTION=12430]acptulsa[/MENTION], don't you know he is 100% right? I mean, it's the "Constitution-Free Zone" after all, where the Bill of Rights no longer matter and one is guilty before proven innocent. Why on earth should people have the right to meet their accuser and stand trial, even Guantanamo prison was/is a huge step forward!

We must destroy the Bill of Rights so that we can protect them!

/s

 

[acptulsa]

We must destroy the Bill of Rights so that we can protect them!

/s

Now where did that come from? After all, he has only come out explicitly in opposition to ten percent of the BoR--so far.

 

[PAF]

Now where did that come from? After all, he has only come out explicitly in opposition to ten percent of the BoR--so far.

I don't think he/she read that far in his/her script book yet. Give him/her time.


1st Amendment - Why should people have a right to express that they are free or innocent?
2nd Amendment - They better not have guns, or else.
3rd Amendment - Eminent Domain is better.
4th Amendment - Warrants, supported by oath or affirmation? Who needs those things?
5th Amendment - We all know everybody should be deprived of life and liberty without due process. Even Trump said that.
6th Amendment - Right to a public trial, lawyer, an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are - soooo over-rated and a waste of words.
7th Amendment - Screw the right of trial by jury shall be preserved.
8th Amendment - Cruel and unusual punishments should be applied, especially when they can get away with the above and below.
9th Amendment - Should be eliminated too - the enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
10th Amendment - Everything is good, except the part about "states respectively, or to the people", which should be stricken.




/s

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Can I just say where I'm at in Oklahoma I have anecdotally noticed far more south-of-the-border immigrant looking folks than usual? I mean, it's becoming very noticeable now.
You can usually tell by a few things that they are recent additions to the U.S.
...

More anecdotal evidence. While seeing signs in Spanish in California is not unusual or unheard of, the large advertising billboards in the central valley have switched recently to almost exclusively Spanish. Advertisers generally know their audience...

 

[Ender]

More anecdotal evidence. While seeing signs in Spanish in California is not unusual or unheard of, the large advertising billboards in the central valley have switched recently to almost exclusively Spanish. Advertisers generally know their audience...

As a kid in S. Cal, I was constantly surround with different ethnics; Hispanics, Chinese, Europeans, Indians, Blacks, etc. Sometimes I was the only "white" kid at the party. And, I loved it!

 

[Brian4Liberty]

As a kid in S. Cal, I was constantly surround with different ethnics; Hispanics, Chinese, Europeans, Indians, Blacks, etc. Sometimes I was the only "white" kid at the party. And, I loved it!

Same here. The SF Bay Area may be more diverse than SoCal, plus we don't waste water up here.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Come on, @acptulsa, don't you know he is 100% right? I mean, it's the "Constitution-Free Zone" after all, where the Bill of Rights no longer matter and one is guilty before proven innocent. Why on earth should people have the right to meet their accuser and stand trial, even Guantanamo prison was/is a huge step forward!

We must destroy the Bill of Rights so that we can protect them!

/s

1 Foreign invaders do not get BoR rights, they have no right to come here.
2 They are not on trial, we are discussing the proper policy for protecting the rights of our citizens from foreign invaders.
3 In this debate evidence has been supplied that they are criminals, none has been supplied that they are anti-communists.


The burden of proof is on you to give us a reason to let them in.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Now where did that come from? After all, he has only come out explicitly in opposition to ten percent of the BoR--so far.

The 9thA contains no rights, it only contains an open invitation for legislation from the bench that threatens the rights of Americans.

 

[acptulsa]

The 9thA contains no rights, it only contains an open invitation for legislation from the bench that threatens the rights of Americans.

Nobody needs you to "think" for them. All you do is parrot breitbart, when you can't parrot zerohedge.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

I know it's an anathema to collectivists, but people can read it and decided for themselves whether the problem is the amendment itself, or two sets of partisans intentionally misreading it.

 

[unknown]

The following is addressed to everyone:

I've asked before, but it's like asking little children to grow up and break the tiresomely repetitive and recurring cycle of "you're a big fat doody-head" name-calling and subsequent "he called me a big fat doody-head" tattle-telling. No one is edified by any of this. Calling someone a "shill" for the eleventy-umpteenth time isn't going to accomplish anything more than doing it the umpteenth time did.

So I'm not asking again. This time, I'm telling.

Stop using the "shill" epithet (or any variation of it) against other forum members.
​

Anyone who indulges in such "shill baiting" will be subject to being warned and told to stop. Thereafter, any further instances of "shill baiting" by the warned poster will result in the issuance of infractions to and/or temporary bans of that poster. Offending posts (including those for which a warning is issued) will be subject to editing or deletion.

Rather than posting "shill" accusations to the open forums, those who are authentically concerned that some other poster may be a genuine "shill" (whatever that is supposed to mean) should use the report function on suspected posts to specify which particular forum guideline(s) the alleged "shill" has violated. (And if you find yourself unable to specify any particular violations, then bite your tongue and find a way to satisfy yourself with substantively criticizing the relevant posts in the open forums without resorting to "shill baiting".)

Is "establishment bootlicker" acceptable?

 

[Occam's Banana]

Is "establishment bootlicker" acceptable?

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/content.php?1989