AngryCanadian
Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2011
- Messages
- 10,257
Kurdistan has Oil thats the only real interest American Gov has in Kurds.
that is a myth. My trusty dragon slayer (M16A4) here in the stan has been just fine. I have never had a jam in any of the 4 deserts on 3 continents I have shot the platform on.
The AK is not as reliable as people say and still requires regular maintenance. The M16/4 platform requires less maintenance than people think. I'd bet if they were offered the M16/4 platform they would jump all over it. The AK isn't a bad weapon, but the legend about it's reliability is just as much as myth as the myth that the m16/4 is jamomatic in the desert.
Funny, my cousin and most of the soldiers that were in war that I know, and I know a lot of them, say exactly the opposite: Soldiers prefer AKs and would throw away their M16s to take AKs.
*there are a lot of versions and a lot of countries that produce AKs. Those produced in Africa are of bad quality because metal that is used is of bad quality.
When both sides are poorly trained, I see 4 to 5 dead guys with AKs to every dead guy with an AR.
When the side with the ARs resembles a real military organization the ratio increases to 10 to 20 dead guys with AKs for every dead guy with an AR.
maybe that explains what happened to the Iraqi army, rather than the fact that the US disbanded it, and then tried to recreate an army in its image.
When both sides are poorly trained, I see 4 to 5 dead guys with AKs to every dead guy with an AR.
When the side with the ARs resembles a real military organization the ratio increases to 10 to 20 dead guys with AKs for every dead guy with an AR.
When both sides are poorly trained, I see 4 to 5 dead guys with AKs to every dead guy with an AR.
When the side with the ARs resembles a real military organization the ratio increases to 10 to 20 dead guys with AKs for every dead guy with an AR.
Funny, my cousin and most of the soldiers that were in war that I know, and I know a lot of them, say exactly the opposite: Soldiers prefer AKs and would throw away their M16s to take AKs.
*there are a lot of versions and a lot of countries that produce AKs. Those produced in Africa are of bad quality because metal that is used is of bad quality.
Kurdistan has Oil thats the only real interest American Gov has in Kurds.
We're so super interested in their oil that we're not letting them sell it to us.
We're so super interested in their oil that we're not letting them sell it to us.
Why cant we invade a fun country where girls wear bikinis? Damn it.
Did you read the article? Lawsuits have been filed regarding the ownership of Kurd oil and the purchasers are not buying until that is resolved, lest they be hit with huge liabilities at a later date. Has nothing to do with "letting them sell it to us." The ownership of the oil is in dispute and the prudent business decision is to not purchase assets while the title of that asset is in dispute.
If the US government recognized the KRG, it would instantly settle the issue.
How so? The article says (for whatever that's worth) that Kurd oil sales aren't banned by the US gov't in the first place. The refusal to purchase is a civil litigation matter.
The two known U.S. buyers of Kurdish crude oil have now rejected delivery of cargoes from tankers near New Jersey and Texas, saying they will not make further purchases until it is determined who has the right to sell the oil: the central government of Iraq or the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG).
There's no gov't restriction on KRG oil being purchased by US companies. Keep moving the goal posts dude.
The only reason that the Iraqi government has a possible claim on the oil is because the region is part of Iraq. If Kurdistan was independent from Iraq, it's fucking obvious that the Iraqi government would have no claim to ownership of the oil. I don't know how I could possibly make it any more clear than that.
And the goal posts move again. Now your argument is the dispute over the ownership of the oil is because an entire new country inside of Iraq hasn't been formed yet and if only a new country existed there would be no legal dispute? Ok well how can I argue with logic like that....
Both AngryCanadian and I referred to the area as Kurdistan. If you're unable to comprehend the conversation, that's not my problem.